
u/Odd-Dirt-9701

History never repeats | Factorcap | FactOrCap
This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post
NASA should have more funding | Factorcap | FactOrCap
This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post
Hows my drawing?
still getting into drawing, one is digital, one is on paper (last image is inspo for the 2nd one)
i havent posted in a while, but today i decided to never post on r/ antiai.
before you assume no i did not switch sides, i just left r/ antiai after recieving hate for a TYPO, a fucking typo, which isnt eveb rational.
i also got hate for supporting AI in certain things, which doesnt make sense.
and again, i am still Anti.
Should i make an SFS guide series on youtube?
reddit wants me to put a bottom text here so bottom text
I think the 67 meme wouldnt be so bad if well, the overgeneralizing, the mocking of religions, it would have been some normal, annoying meme that would pass, if it wasnt for those types of people
reddit.comWell, i never thought i would see pros like this, genuinely.
First of all happy pride month.
second, how is LGBTQ related to Pro-AI?
Art and Gender Identity are 2, comepletely different things.
Being a part of the LGBTQ+ community is an innate, human state of being. No one chooses their identity. On the other hand, choosing to use a specific software program or art method is a voluntary consumer preference. Conflating a software choice with a human rights struggle fundamentally misunderstands both.
they are two different things.
(note on the title, i didnt make a good distinction of the type of pros im specifically talking about)
If there is anyone that can help, what are your tips for making a new SCP?
i wanna try and submit a new SCP.
and no, i havent made any drafts yet.
i am currently stuck between what type of SCP should i make, of course i will figure that out myself, just want some heads up and tips for submitting. i think any tip of any kind would help, from observation or experience.
thanks!
Flerfs are misusing the Bible
Whether you believe in God or not, flerfs are misusing the bible.
(please keep discussions respectful)
the Bible was made to record Gods relationship with humans and the Gospel, not to disprove science.
"God made the the Flat earth, blah blah says this, blah says that"
saying it again.
The Bible was made for holy purposes, not to disprove science
Do you guys think Valve will intervene with the situation with Inviz rn? direct or indirectly
Inviz has the power to shut down all ST merchandise because they are based off of SFM models, which Valve owns.
even if inviz somehow works around the merch part, if Valve wanted to, they could restrict or entirely block monetization on videos containing their copyrighted 3D meshes
checkmate + double en passant in 24 MOVES (100 vs 200 elo game)
i am playing as white
I CAST let us tackle this persistent old urban myth about our fuzzy little buzzing companions, shall we? You have likely heard some clever clogs down the local pub proclaiming that according to all known laws of aviation, the humble bumblebee should not be able to get its plump, velvety bottom.....
(full text if you want)
I COUNTER CAST!! https://www.reddit.com/r/icast/comments/1t8tfst/i_cast_according_to_all_known_laws_of_aviation/
let us tackle this persistent old urban myth about our fuzzy little buzzing companions, shall we? You have likely heard some clever clogs down the local pub proclaiming that according to all known laws of aviation, the humble bumblebee should not be able to get its plump, velvety bottom off the ground because its wings are far too minuscule to support such a remarkably rotund frame. For the longest time, even the most proper chaps in white laboratory coats were left thoroughly scratching their heads over this baffling conundrum, as standard fixed-wing aircraft calculations simply could not account for the sheer marvel of apian mechanics. The truth of the matter, however, is that bees do not fly like a stately British Airways airliner at all, but rather like an incredibly frantic, highly sophisticated miniature helicopter operating on absolute overdrive.
Instead of flapping their wings up and down in a calm and dignified manner, these industrious little creatures sweep their wings back and forth in a rather peculiar ninety-degree arc, flipping them upside down at the end of each stroke like an expert chef tossing a pancake. This remarkable twisting motion happens at a staggering pace of roughly two hundred and thirty beats per second, creating a series of tiny, low-pressure air vortexes directly above the wings, which quite literally sucks the bee upward into the breeze. Furthermore, their thorax is packed with a rather brilliant set of indirect flight muscles that do not wait for individual brain signals to twitch, but instead vibrate automatically in a rhythmic resonance, allowing the bee to carry a massive load of pollen without suffering an absolute bout of physical exhaustion. It is a splendidly chaotic, brute-force approach to aerodynamics that utterly defies traditional engineering, proving that nature does not give a toss about human blueprints when there is sweet nectar to be harvested for queen and country.
(repost cuz im bored) Why we dont have a video from the ground, to the full globe.
now first of all, ground to globe, you want one, one continous video of a rocket going into the orbit to either see the earth and its curve or the entire earth itself- now here is why that isnt practical or financially smart even with todays technology.
- NASA just doesnt have the budget or time to devolop a moon rated rocket (besides the SLS), and if you include the high quality cameras you flerfs want PLUS protecting the cameras, AND stopping debris, plus making strong enough systems to even hold a 4+ day video in 4k (which is in the thousands, in gigabites), AND a strong enough satilite antenna to retrieve the video. its just too expensive. NASA is LITERALLY begging for money.
- Its not worth it, simple, i already explained its expensive, and what benefit does it give if you flerfs wont believe it anyway? stop asking for things you will say is fake.
Second of all, we have MANY ground to globe (or atleast when the earths curve is obvious), some are even from 2017, its the proof you have been asking yet saying its "ai"
Thirdly, about Artemis 2, you wonder how a spacecraft at mach 33 can slow down to 16mph, well, thats simple, at mach 33, the air is not something you can phase through, it becomes a brick wall which slow down orion VERY much until it reaches a safe speed for the parashutes, and why is it not hot when the Navy touched the capsule? thats because it landed in the fricken ocean.
Has anyone ever felt a feeling somewhat like "its too good for what it is" when seeing good ai art? like, really, good ai art.
i have this feeling every time when i see good ai art, and yes, its not "good", i mean good, like actually nice, and i get mixed emotions about it.
EDIT:
and just to expand this a bit since my title is permanent, this can include music.