





Obsession runs the gauntlet against well-renowned films that have a lower Letterboxd score compared to it, how far does it go?
Stage 1:Rain Man
Stage 2:The Batman
Stage 3:Uncut Gems
Stage 4:Nightcrawler
Stage 5:Donnie Darko






Stage 1:Rain Man
Stage 2:The Batman
Stage 3:Uncut Gems
Stage 4:Nightcrawler
Stage 5:Donnie Darko
I really cannot tell if he is poor, barely making it, decently well-off, rich, or something else. Is he a cartoon character? Is the amount of money he has relative to what the plot requires?
MC:1.GT 2.MS=UG
Other Characters:1.MS 2.GT 3.UG
Themes:1.GT 2.MS 3.UG
Delivery of Themes:1.GT 2.UG 3.MS
Depth/Complexity:1.GT=MS 2.UG
Emotion:1.MS 2.GT 3.UG
Dialogue:1.GT 2.MS=UG
Dynamics:1.GT=MS 2.UG
Pacing:1.UG 2.GT 3.MS
Climax:1.MS (by a long shot) 2.UG 3.GT
Conclusions:1.GT 2.UG 3.MS
Acting:1.MS 2.UG 3.GT
Cinematography:1.GT 2.UG 3.MS
Overall:GT>>MS>UG
Please don't take this down there is no other active place to discuss the Safdie films. Let me know how you disagree.
it hasn't popped up on my fyp when ive needed it to. its a rock song with a chorus that becomes suddenly soft and vocal, its from what I assume to be an iconic band, it has a purple cover.
it hasn't popped up on my fyp when ive needed it to. its a rock song with a chorus that becomes suddenly soft and vocal, its from what I assume to be an iconic band, it has a purple cover.
don't ask me how I know. he's hunting me down since I've gotten ahold of this information.
I don't really have to go over the first half of this. Rorschach has been infamously misinterpreted and wrongly idolized since the series came out. However, I feel that now the main crowd doing this are the people who supposedly understand his character. They forsake any empathy/sympathy for him and treat him as a symbol of pure evil. They paint his violence, largely a coping mechanism for him, as straight sadism. They use loose, mostly incompatible labels like "incel" to disregard his psychological torment and complexity. I've seen many analyzation posts just be filled with the same parroted line: "Reminder, you're not supposed to idolize him." These people aren't as bad as the classic misinterpreters, but I don't believe they get to sit on some intellectual high-horse acting like they understood the comic fully.
with ride's vocal style and the heavy production, mishearing lyrics is a pretty common thing amongst listeners. I thought of this idea from "I've Seen Footage". I thought ride says in the song, "Seen crazy shit. Make crazy shit." instead of repeating the first part. I like the first better because it connects to how the artists' experiences have led them to make their baller music. Are there any lyrics you guys have misheard that sound better to you as you misheard them?
it's crazy how despite their music, they have such bad merch.
As WE all know, July 1st is when we come together to appreciate Fantano's greatest friend: LosPollosTV. What are you guys doing to celebrate?
Travis has one of the most unique careers I've seen from a music artist. While there are numerous albums under his "LUM" name, most aren't actually connected to what Lil Ugly Mane is. He drops PC and MTI that are musically attached to the title and then, famously, strays away from that music. The way I view it is that he had too much fame attached to the title "LUM" and realized his career progression would be much, much easier if he continued to attach that name to future projects.
The 3 Guys One Hammer theory or the Ariana Grande concert Steroids one? I'd say the first because of how edgy it is and how disrespectful it is to the artistic integrity of the group.
(not trying to trivialize any of his behaviors)
I am a diagnosed schizoid and am trying to lose my virginity without having to engage in anything truly social.