Meta glasses are cyberwear and why cyber punks creators are potential millionaires,( from a tech corpo perspective)

I was thinking about how the concept Meta glasses, come straight out of already existing cyberpunk lore, including my own, when I first sketched my version of meta AI (rayban) glasses 8 years ago when the company first started the development project.

At this time, I had came up with the meta glasses rayban remix (which is an actual product today) while thinking back to the days where I actually sold raybans in the past. I just combined my interests with augmented reality and fashion glasses to predict what Meta glasses actually looks like today. I would argue that this aesthetic is more closely related to cyber-prep than cyber -punk.

But today after fulling embracing a cyber-punk creator identity, I realized that as a cyberpunk content creator and worldbuilder, you tend to have to come up with tech products that exist in the future. This is really no different than how tech corpos think. They come up with a crazy idea, get a research team together and talk to investors. Then in a few years they are billionaires somehow.

I am thinking to myself now, why aren't I doing the same thing? (disclosure: I am 100% fine with playing the character of evil tech corpo for the sake of making money)

Why aren't I taking the inventions I create in my own cyberpunk lore, and actually trying to build some of these things and take this prototype to investors to make a buck?

I would argue that this is a viable path for any sci-fi tech creator., to just actually build the stuff that make cyberpunk cool in the video games and movies.

reddit.com
u/Own_Food8806 — 2 days ago

Things I will be contributing to anti-circumcision social justice in the next 1-5 years

First of all, I am well aware that most of you hate my views but I do not give a damn. I did not come here to be liked, my mission is to get shit done.

Static Media

I have developed 2 brands of meme/comics tailored for 3 platforms (reddit, tiktok, and instagram). The design language and pace of memes/comics are optimized for acceptance, growth, trend lifecycle time complexities per platform. This just means that content formats are favored by their respective hosts, the platforms.

Animations

I will repurpose workflows used to create animations that describe concepts in computer science and repurpose them to explain physiological and neurological aspects of circumcision damage, in 3d

AIO GEO tech

I can fix the pro-cutter AI slop outputs by engines such as Google Ai Mode. I have already made some patches where generative AI is returning correct circ info on specific subject matters. If you see that AI gives you an anti-circ return, that is possibly due to some of my work. And there is nothing the government and doctors can do about it.

u/Own_Food8806 — 5 days ago
▲ 40 r/CircumcisionJustice+1 crossposts

We need to win hearts before we win laws.

I support intactivism, but I think we should think carefully about how we present our message.

Lately I've seen a lot of posts that come across as angry or confrontational. I understand the frustration—many of us feel we were denied a choice about our own bodies. But if our movement becomes known for outrage instead of education, people will stop listening.

I believe education should come before legislation.

Let's explain what the foreskin is, what functions it serves, and why many men feel they lost sensitivity, the gliding mechanism, and other aspects of sexual function after circumcision. If people understand what is being removed, they're much more likely to question the practice themselves.

I also think one of our strongest arguments is bodily autonomy. Instead of telling others what they must do, we can simply say that every child deserves the opportunity to make this permanent decision for themselves when they're old enough to give informed consent.

If we want intactivism to be taken seriously, we should be known for facts, respect, and education—not for sounding extremist. Winning hearts and minds will ultimately achieve far more than anger ever will.

reddit.com
u/Front-Capital-4040 — 6 days ago

a creative post. If you were dropped off in a cyberpunk world. Do you think you would do well and be successful and why?

What is your character?

What are your strengths?

What do you look like?

How are you chromed up, what are your enhancements?

What kind of missions do you accept?

how do you make money?

what is your type, are you a hero/anti-hero etc?

reddit.com
u/Own_Food8806 — 7 days ago

feminists get pleasure from knife-raping boys

https://preview.redd.it/kfuol83uvw9h1.png?width=913&format=png&auto=webp&s=6960352406b220fed587c1945c8630710b1a0972

Remember the folks that said "FGM is far worse". See my case is special, because what has happened to me is actually comparable to infibulation (the worst type of FGM that has been sensationalized to uphold the lies about circumcision). They simply don't care if circumcision can be just as bad or even worse than FGM, their narrative is about hurting boys sexually because they get enjoyment out of it. The term "incel" is used specifically to hurt men that they feel lack sexual satisfaction. Sexual frustration ISN'T CAUSED BY LACK OF FEMALE VALIDATION, it is caused by genital mutilation of male children. That is why "incel" is exclusively a term used to describe American (united states) men, because the practice is dominant is this country.

People who downplay MGM/Circumcision are evil child-rape supporters

reddit.com
u/Own_Food8806 — 8 days ago
▲ 19 r/CircumcisionJustice+1 crossposts

Brigaded: A Study on Oppression and Justice

My recent post https://www.reddit.com/r/CircumcisionJustice/comments/1ugcx6k/every_antifgm_law_is_a_step_backward_not_forward/

was brigaded here https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTears/comments/1ugwh5k/removed_by_moderator/

You can read the posts on that sub to get a sense of the kinds of people and the kinds of things they were saying here on the Circ Justice sub. Needless to say their comments on this sub are all removed and they are all banned.

Notice exactly what's happening here. First, our enemies squirm incredibly and make it a gender war issue where there wasn't one. I don't mention "men" or "women" once in my original post. All I do is call out that anti-FGM laws only protect one gender, and that gender is the one that is already over protected. There are many anti-FGM laws and no anti-circ laws. Yet our cutter enemies somehow take that to mean I'm somehow anti-feminist and and an incel (?). I didn't mention feminism at all. I said anti-FGM flaws are gender based and exclude based on identity group.

I don't care to belabor the point any more, there are much more interesting things going on here. One, feminists at least the ones in that post WANT to make it a gendered issue. They took a post that wasn't really about the gender war at all, and made it about how men blame women for stuff. Well I wasn't before, but now I am. All the women that brigaded are minimizing the harms of circ and saying how you can't compare it to FGM. That is the oppression. Them minimizing and marginazing me and my systemic oppression IS the harm. How's about we get some self awareness and accountability, by minimizing the harms of circ YOU are and agent of the oppressive cutting culture, full stop. Check your privelage and understand your fragility.

It's also cool to see the aspects of power at play here with having out own space. Since this sub is a space for the victims, we set the rules. We can ban them all and remove their posts in a heartbeat. And I was able to report and get the original post removed from IncelTears for brigading, which is against platform TOS. For the first time, maybe ever, circ victims have their own space to demand justice, and are actually in a position of power, if even on just an online forum, to achieve some level of it.

reddit.com
u/Own_Food8806 — 8 days ago
▲ 45 r/CircumcisionJustice+2 crossposts

Every Anti-FGM Law is a Step Backward, Not Forward

I saw the recent news Colombia banned FGM.

And I cannot help once again going against the grain and saying this is clearly a huge step backward for circumcision justice, not a step forward.

The average "Intactivist" I feel would be very supportive on the new discriminatory law, citing that "more protections against genital cutting are always good". I couldn't disagree more.

The new Colombian law excludes by identity group, only protecting one gender. To me, this is an enormous step backward, not forward. We are talking about the adults electing to intrude into the genitals of children. There are no half measure solutions, especially identity based oppressive one. Colombia has singled out an underserved identity population and expressly signed a law protecting only the already overserved population. There are plenty of anti-FGM laws around the world already, and zero anti-circ.

Put it like this, let's say during colonial USA, a law was passed that prevented only white people from being owned as slaves. Should we champion that? Of course not. This isn't the kind of thing where we all sit around and sing Kumbaya and make half-measure solutions one identity group at time. Should the slaves sing Kumbaya with their masters after only white people are banned from being slaves since it's "one step closer to banning slavery"? Of course not, how absurd.

Banning cutting for only one gender re-enforces the problematic views that have enabled the cutting the continue for the underserved gender in the first place. It is a huge step backward, not a step forward. Just like banning slavery only for white people is further from any sort of justice than passing no law at all, banning cutting for only one gender is further from any sort of justice.

Overall, and I say it all the time, I'm getting really sick of expecting below the bare minimum. I refuse to take the breadcrumbs that are actually just more oppression, like Colombia banning cutting for only one gender, and celebrate it like it's some how favorable to me. It's not. It's just another daily heaping of oppression.

reddit.com
u/MindlessStone — 9 days ago

Larry Nassar used medicine to penetrate under age girls. I don't wanna hear any more intactivist horseshit about "parental consent" and "ignorant doctors"

Larry Nassar used the guise of pelvic floor physical therapy (specifically internal vaginal and rectal myofascial manipulation) as a pretext to sexually abuse hundreds of patients. He claimed this rare, specialized treatment was necessary to heal injuries, relieve chronic pelvic pain, and correct spinal or hip issues.

While legitimate pelvic floor physical therapy is a recognized medical treatment for conditions like incontinence and pelvic pain, Nassar used it as a cover for predatory behavior, conducting the invasive procedures without proper medical draping, gloves, or chaperones.

Nassar exploited loopholes in the sports medicine and gymnastics cultures of the time to perform these highly invasive procedures without true informed consent:

How Nassar Bypassed Consent

  • Exploiting Loopholes: Nassar operated under generalized medical consent forms signed by parents for overall sports medicine treatment, rather than obtaining specific, written consent for invasive internal pelvic procedures.
  • Abusing Trust and Elite Status: He used his prestige as an Olympic team doctor to manipulate parents. If a parent or athlete questioned his methods, he would dismiss their concerns or make them feel "stupid" for asking.
  • Grooming and Concealment: Nassar often abused athletes in private training rooms with the windows covered, or explicitly hid his movements using towels or blankets even while parents were sitting just feet away in the same room.
  • Lack of Legitimate Medical Protocols: In legitimate medical practices, internal pelvic therapy on a minor requires a rigorous informed consent process with both the parent and patient. It also requires the use of gloves, a medical chaperone, and clear step-by-step explanations—all of which Nassar ignored.

Legislative Changes (The "Nassar Laws")

Because of his systemic abuse, the state of Michigan and federal lawmakers enacted major reforms to ensure this could not happen again:

  • The Safe Sport Act: Enacted federally, this law now strictly limits one-on-one interactions between minor athletes and adults without an observable, interruptible distance. [1]
  • Explicit Written Consent Laws: Michigan passed specific bipartisan legislation mandating explicit, written parental consent and the mandatory presence of an additional health professional (chaperone) during pelvic or sensitive exams on minors.
u/Own_Food8806 — 10 days ago

Medical Circumcision does not exist

I just wanted to double down on this post to say that there is absolutely no such thing as medical circumcision. Those who say that there is ARE pro-circumcision. There are many intactivists who want medical circumcision to be a thing, so that they can blame circumcision on ignorance, which is 100% false.

There is no such thing as medical female circumcision. I have not met ONE woman in my entire life who have had parts of her external sexual anatomy removed for any reason, despite having a higher chance of having a genital condition than her male counterparts. I literally was in ER hearing a doctor scrape cysts out of a woman's vagina without ever discussing cutting off her labias or clitoris (this hospital obviously could care less about privacy BTW).

Medical circumcision is not medical, because circumcision is not medicine. The practice was literally borrowed from a child sex abuse ritual where an practitioner take a blade to proceed to violently remove essential parts of a male child's reproductive and sexual anatomy for cosmetic reasons, without any pain management. In hospitals, they use the same exact term to identify the practice: Circumcision. If it were a true medical procedure, than they would have used more of a medical term such as prepucectomy. But they didn't, because it is isn't medicine. They didn't even bother to change the name to cover their tracks. How disgusting.

Force retraction is not medicine. There is literally no condition that warrants a doctor to tear the membrane, push the skin back and expose the glans on a male child, for the penis to look erect. This is child molestation, not a check up. You should not have to injure your child to simply bathe them. There is no such thing as excavating a female child for hygiene or for medical reasons, it is child molestation, even when a doctor does it. It is a crime to spread a underage girls labias to appear aroused. There is no such thing as "consensual" molestation, so fuck off with this "parent's consented" nonsense. Again, refer to Larry Nassar. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF HIS VICTIM, GOT "PARENTAL CONSENT" BEFORE THEY WERE MOLESTED.

Removing a child's sex organs, because of infections is not medicine. Infections are not caused by the frenulum and foreskin, they are caused by the actions of doctors and caretakers. It is offenders that need to be removed, not the child's natural sexual anatomy.

Cutting off a child's sex organs right after they are born to prevent hypothetical disease that never happened, is not medicine. That is felony sex abuse and child endangerment. Routine infant circumcision suggest that the foreskin and frenulum are birth defects. They are not. This is pseudoscience, not medicine.

Medical procedures don't have cosmetic look-alikes. (nope: top and bottom surgery aren't cosmetic, b4 trans warrior say a thing. They are considered therapeutic)

There no such thing as a

  • cosmetic kidney transplant
  • cosmetic ovary removal
  • cosmetic root canal
  • cosmetic bypass surgery
  • cosmetic pap smear
u/Own_Food8806 — 10 days ago
▲ 109 r/CircumcisionJustice+1 crossposts

When doctors amputate only a limited amount of the foreskin from an infant, many parents are often frustrated

When doctors amputate only a limited amount of the foreskin from an infant, many parents are often frustrated with the cosmetic result and will schedule another amputation to have more of the foreskin removed leaving the child increasingly sexually disabled and causing further sensory loss and early infancy trauma/suffering

u/CarterSteinhoff — 8 days ago
▲ 57 r/CircumcisionJustice+2 crossposts

Lost all respect for Marylin Milos after learning she had all three of her sons circumcised.

No seriously. It feels like actually seeing the wizard behind the curtain.

reddit.com
u/Own_Food8806 — 8 days ago

The ACT OF CIRCUMCISION itself is so obviously a violation that if PARENTS didn’t even choose to look into it further then that’s on them. They don’t deserve sympathy. Fuck them.

If they did research on circumcision AFTER THE FUCKING THING HAPPENED they are not redeemable. You cannot forgive society for circumcising you. The act in itself is irreconcilable.The shift from Brit Milah (Pulling the foreskin forward and snipping) to Brit Peri'ah (Peeling the foreskin off the glans fully) is what makes modern circumcision so brutal, and was introduced around 140 A.D. a generation or two after the fall of the temple 70 AD. And it destroys the lives of millions of men today, around the world.

reddit.com
u/Own_Food8806 — 13 days ago

CIRCUMCISION VICTIMS MUST MAKE POST AFTER POST AFTER POST. Stop ranting about "society" and post online what is really bothering you (unnatural sexual frustration and torture)

This is pretty self explanatory. The more diverse the tone and nuance on the subject, the better content creators can make viral posts ( I am a content creator).

But more importantly....

When you have the same person posting over and over again, (when there are literally thousands of group members) the tone gets dry and it also get DOWN RANKED on the social media platforms' explore page, recommended section and FYP (for you page on tiktok) because platforms prioritize evolving narratives (trends) over all.

Do not argue with me. This isn't an opinion, it is a mathematically bound algorithm that decides this. I am just the messenger.

reddit.com
u/Own_Food8806 — 13 days ago