u/ProbablyNotTheCocoa

is this a bug? when using zoomies 120 damage should be the max without any ability power, yet i can get upwards of 170 at the right angles

u/ProbablyNotTheCocoa — 5 days ago

what to do against a ball when the entire team is on a goose chase as a tank?

last three matches ive played has been push maps against ball, and im really lost on what to do as the tank. Way too often does my team go on a wild goose chase after the ball. should i join them in the hopes of catching the ball or do i just focus their backline? and if so what do i do when they hugbox with with heavy cc characters on the push bot? i generally play dva, but whenever i face a ball i genuinely feel lost on what my objective should be, start flailing around in mystery heroes mode and just tilt, any tips are highly appreciated

reddit.com
u/ProbablyNotTheCocoa — 5 days ago

All Under Jorvik: Prettania in the year 1020 of the Common Era

After the arrival of the Great Heathen Army in 865, the eastern coast of Prettania gradually fell under Norse control. What began as a loose occupation of ports, river towns, and tribute territories became known collectively as the Danelaw, though in this early period it was less a unified realm and more a patchwork of warbands, jarldoms, and negotiated territories bound together through common interest and the authority of the great sea-kings.

The first decades of Norse expansion were violent and uncertain. Northumbria collapsed quickly, and Jórvík became the first major Norse stronghold in England, functioning not only as a military base but also as a growing commercial center tied to the North Sea trade routes. Mercia followed slowly afterward, weakened by repeated campaigning and internal rivalries. Yet the Norse advance stalled in the south. The decisive moment came at the Battle of Edington. Though remembered differently by later traditions, the battle was in reality a costly stalemate. Wessex survived, but only barely, while the Norse armies found themselves unable to fully break the remaining Anglo-Saxon kingdoms.

In the aftermath, the Norse lords convened under the Great Þing of the North Sea, where a tentative peace was negotiated with Wessex. At the time many warriors viewed the settlement as a humiliation, but in hindsight it proved transformative. The pause in expansion coincided with the accelerating collapse of West Francia. As Carolingian authority fractured and the Frankish coasts descended into war, piracy, and succession struggles, merchants increasingly abandoned the old continental ports. Trade routes that had once flowed through the Channel and Frankish river systems began shifting northward through the safer harbors of the Danelaw.

This economic shift changed the Norse presence in Prettania fundamentally. During the late 9th and early 10th centuries, the old raiding warbands slowly transformed into landed aristocracies. Danish settlers intermarried with Anglo-Saxon nobles, local rulers entered into tributary arrangements, and fortified camps evolved into permanent towns and aristocratic estates. The Danelaw ceased to be merely a military occupation and became instead a commercial-maritime society. Jórvík, Lincoln, Norwich, and the Humber ports flourished as major trade hubs linking the reinvigorated Umayyad realm in Qurtuba to the Baltic, Scandinavia, and the British Isles.

As trade expanded, so too did Norse influence abroad. By the late-10th century, Norse jarls dominated much of the Irish coast. Cork, Dublin, Wexford, Waterford, and Limerick all came under the rule of Norse-Gaelic dynasties who swore fealty to Jórvík in exchange for military protection and privileged access to North Sea trade. These cities became wealthy intermediary ports between the Atlantic world and the increasingly prosperous Danelaw markets.

Scotland proved more difficult. Raids from the Isles and conflicts between rival Scottish claimants destabilized the kingdom throughout the 970s. A series of civil wars erupted in 979, allowing Jórvík to intervene repeatedly through military support and strategic marriages with the lords of Lothian and Strathclyde. Over time the Lowlands drifted into the Norse sphere. The region was reorganized into the Lordship of Southern Alba, formally ruled under the authority of Jórvík, while the Highland clans retained broad autonomy in exchange for tribute and military cooperation. At roughly the same time, the Kingdom of the Suðreyjar aligned itself with the Danelaw confederation, swearing fealty in exchange for recognition of its claims over Galloway and dynastic marriage ties.

Meanwhile Wessex entered a long decline. The peace after Edington had preserved the kingdom politically, but economically it had been disastrous. The rerouting of trade toward Danelaw ports steadily weakened Anglo-Saxon commerce. Norse control of the eastern shipping lanes allowed Danelaw-aligned merchants and captains to dominate coastal trade, while hostile tariffs, seizures, and raids slowly strangled southern markets. Royal authority weakened as nobles blamed the kings of Wessex both for conceding to the heathens and for failing to reverse the kingdom’s economic collapse.

London became the turning point. By 983 the city could no longer survive in isolation from the North Sea trade system. Facing commercial ruin, its merchants negotiated directly with Danelaw traders, granting them favorable treatment and docking rights in exchange for economic relief. Though officially still loyal to Wessex, London’s integration into the Danelaw economy effectively signaled the end of Anglo-Saxon independence.

The final unraveling came only a few years later. In 997 a coalition of Mercian nobles rebelled against their southern overlords. Yet instead of turning to Wessex for aid, many appealed directly to the Þing lords for arbitration and military support. The Danelaw intervened, restoring order while simultaneously restructuring the political landscape of central England. Mercia was fragmented into marcher territories along the Welsh frontier, Oxford was elevated into a semi-autonomous lordship, and eastern Mercia was absorbed more directly into the confederative system of the Þing. Though Wessex continued to exist formally, by the turn of the century the crown’s authority had become almost entirely symbolic.

The death of Wessex came in 1018. A faction of desperate nobles led by the king’s younger brother overthrew the so-called Shunned Lord of Winchester, hoping to restore a unified Anglo-Saxon kingdom free from Norse influence. The rebellion briefly rallied southern resistance, but the response from the Þing was swift and overwhelming. By the summer of 1020 the armies of Jórvík had burned Winchester, crushed the rebellion, and dismantled the remaining institutions of Wessex permanently.

In the settlement that followed, southern England was reorganized into a loose network of dependent lordships. Wessex and Sussex became separate territories, Kent emerged as a semi-autonomous maritime lordship, Cornwall was recognized as a tributary client kingdom and expanded into Devon, while London was granted special privileges as a free commercial lordship to ensure the continued flow of trade. Welsh rulers were given a simple ultimatum: acknowledge the sovereignty of the Þing and retain their autonomy, or face economic blockade and invasion. Most accepted tributary status willingly, especially after the Welsh Marches were reorganized in their favor at Mercia’s expense.

By the autumn of 1020, the old Anglo-Saxon order had effectively ceased to exist. In its place emerged what contemporaries would refer to as the North Sea Confederation or simply the Danelaw, laying the groundwork for what would eventually become Daneland and the de facto political unification of Danic polities as Jórvík and the Ragnarsson dynasty. Through the Þing Jórvík would begin centralizing power through legal code, becoming the legal entity responsible for calling the Þing and as usually electred to the seat of the Highjarl, responsible for arbitration between the other delegates, slowly drowning out the authority of Wessex, Sussex and Mercia in favour of merchant delegates and marcher fiefs. This assembly would lay the groundwork for the Danic Great Þing that evolved later during the Danic reformation and later Prettonic era.

This is a pseudo contination of two other maps:
https://www.reddit.com/r/imaginarymaps/comments/1tam7b8/the_new_world_in_1850/
https://www.reddit.com/r/imaginarymaps/comments/1sraoat/isbaniya_in_1600_and_subnational_divisions/
feel free to ask any questions about the lore

u/ProbablyNotTheCocoa — 9 days ago

All Under Jorvik: Prettania in the year 1020 of the Common Era

After the arrival of the Great Heathen Army in 865, the eastern coast of Prettania gradually fell under Norse control. What began as a loose occupation of ports, river towns, and tribute territories became known collectively as the Danelaw, though in this early period it was less a unified realm and more a patchwork of warbands, jarldoms, and negotiated territories bound together through common interest and the authority of the great sea-kings.

The first decades of Norse expansion were violent and uncertain. Northumbria collapsed quickly, and Jórvík became the first major Norse stronghold in England, functioning not only as a military base but also as a growing commercial center tied to the North Sea trade routes. Mercia followed slowly afterward, weakened by repeated campaigning and internal rivalries. Yet the Norse advance stalled in the south. The decisive moment came at the Battle of Edington. Though remembered differently by later traditions, the battle was in reality a costly stalemate. Wessex survived, but only barely, while the Norse armies found themselves unable to fully break the remaining Anglo-Saxon kingdoms.

In the aftermath, the Norse lords convened under the Great Þing of the North Sea, where a tentative peace was negotiated with Wessex. At the time many warriors viewed the settlement as a humiliation, but in hindsight it proved transformative. The pause in expansion coincided with the accelerating collapse of West Francia. As Carolingian authority fractured and the Frankish coasts descended into war, piracy, and succession struggles, merchants increasingly abandoned the old continental ports. Trade routes that had once flowed through the Channel and Frankish river systems began shifting northward through the safer harbors of the Danelaw.

This economic shift changed the Norse presence in Prettania fundamentally. During the late 9th and early 10th centuries, the old raiding warbands slowly transformed into landed aristocracies. Danish settlers intermarried with Anglo-Saxon nobles, local rulers entered into tributary arrangements, and fortified camps evolved into permanent towns and aristocratic estates. The Danelaw ceased to be merely a military occupation and became instead a commercial-maritime society. Jórvík, Lincoln, Norwich, and the Humber ports flourished as major trade hubs linking the reinvigorated Umayyad realm in Qurtuba to the Baltic, Scandinavia, and the British Isles.

As trade expanded, so too did Norse influence abroad. By the late-10th century, Norse jarls dominated much of the Irish coast. Cork, Dublin, Wexford, Waterford, and Limerick all came under the rule of Norse-Gaelic dynasties who swore fealty to Jórvík in exchange for military protection and privileged access to North Sea trade. These cities became wealthy intermediary ports between the Atlantic world and the increasingly prosperous Danelaw markets.

Scotland proved more difficult. Raids from the Isles and conflicts between rival Scottish claimants destabilized the kingdom throughout the 970s. A series of civil wars erupted in 979, allowing Jórvík to intervene repeatedly through military support and strategic marriages with the lords of Lothian and Strathclyde. Over time the Lowlands drifted into the Norse sphere. The region was reorganized into the Lordship of Southern Alba, formally ruled under the authority of Jórvík, while the Highland clans retained broad autonomy in exchange for tribute and military cooperation. At roughly the same time, the Kingdom of the Suðreyjar aligned itself with the Danelaw confederation, swearing fealty in exchange for recognition of its claims over Galloway and dynastic marriage ties.

Meanwhile Wessex entered a long decline. The peace after Edington had preserved the kingdom politically, but economically it had been disastrous. The rerouting of trade toward Danelaw ports steadily weakened Anglo-Saxon commerce. Norse control of the eastern shipping lanes allowed Danelaw-aligned merchants and captains to dominate coastal trade, while hostile tariffs, seizures, and raids slowly strangled southern markets. Royal authority weakened as nobles blamed the kings of Wessex both for conceding to the heathens and for failing to reverse the kingdom’s economic collapse.

London became the turning point. By 983 the city could no longer survive in isolation from the North Sea trade system. Facing commercial ruin, its merchants negotiated directly with Danelaw traders, granting them favorable treatment and docking rights in exchange for economic relief. Though officially still loyal to Wessex, London’s integration into the Danelaw economy effectively signaled the end of Anglo-Saxon independence.

The final unraveling came only a few years later. In 997 a coalition of Mercian nobles rebelled against their southern overlords. Yet instead of turning to Wessex for aid, many appealed directly to the Þing lords for arbitration and military support. The Danelaw intervened, restoring order while simultaneously restructuring the political landscape of central England. Mercia was fragmented into marcher territories along the Welsh frontier, Oxford was elevated into a semi-autonomous lordship, and eastern Mercia was absorbed more directly into the confederative system of the Þing. Though Wessex continued to exist formally, by the turn of the century the crown’s authority had become almost entirely symbolic.

The death of Wessex came in 1018. A faction of desperate nobles led by the king’s younger brother overthrew the so-called Shunned Lord of Winchester, hoping to restore a unified Anglo-Saxon kingdom free from Norse influence. The rebellion briefly rallied southern resistance, but the response from the Þing was swift and overwhelming. By the summer of 1020 the armies of Jórvík had burned Winchester, crushed the rebellion, and dismantled the remaining institutions of Wessex permanently.

In the settlement that followed, southern England was reorganized into a loose network of dependent lordships. Wessex and Sussex became separate territories, Kent emerged as a semi-autonomous maritime lordship, Cornwall was recognized as a tributary client kingdom and expanded into Devon, while London was granted special privileges as a free commercial lordship to ensure the continued flow of trade. Welsh rulers were given a simple ultimatum: acknowledge the sovereignty of the Þing and retain their autonomy, or face economic blockade and invasion. Most accepted tributary status willingly, especially after the Welsh Marches were reorganized in their favor at Mercia’s expense.

By the autumn of 1020, the old Anglo-Saxon order had effectively ceased to exist. In its place emerged what contemporaries would refer to as the North Sea Confederation or simply the Danelaw, laying the groundwork for what would eventually become Daneland and the de facto political unification of Danic polities as Jórvík and the Ragnarsson dynasty. Through the Þing Jórvík would begin centralizing power through legal code, becoming the legal entity responsible for calling the Þing and as usually electred to the seat of the Highjarl, responsible for arbitration between the other delegates, slowly drowning out the authority of Wessex, Sussex and Mercia in favour of merchant delegates and marcher fiefs. This assembly would lay the groundwork for the Danic Great Þing that evolved later during the Danic reformation and later Prettonic era.

This is a pseudo contination of two other maps:
https://www.reddit.com/r/imaginarymaps/comments/1tam7b8/the_new_world_in_1850/
https://www.reddit.com/r/imaginarymaps/comments/1sraoat/isbaniya_in_1600_and_subnational_divisions/
feel free to ask any questions about the lore

u/ProbablyNotTheCocoa — 9 days ago

The New World in 1850

A Continuation of this map: https://www.reddit.com/r/imaginarymaps/comments/1sraoat/isbaniya_in_1600_and_subnational_divisions/
It shows how the colonial world evolved and how the lessened need for alternative trade routes lead to the new world powers of the Mexica(Aztecs) and Tawantinsuyu(Inca) having enough time to restore stability following the initial outbreak of old world diseases, lore is still WIP though. The map depicts the aftermath of the Mayap Revolt which saw the Mayapan Confederation and Miskito Dominion oust the de facto rule of Qurtuba in the region

u/ProbablyNotTheCocoa — 11 days ago
▲ 75 r/eu4

AI old world being competent for once

two sicilies are absolutely popping off, even restoring the holy land, sweden managed to form scandinavia, China is nearly unified, lubeck is doing great, frisia created a new world empire, Kilwa is still kicking etc.

was trying to have a chill inca game (did artificially boost Aztecs and make a custom Iroqiois tag)

u/ProbablyNotTheCocoa — 12 days ago
▲ 9 r/cs2

why would you buy anything from the terminal?

Returning player here, i tried out the terminal system and after 5 or so openings ive gotten a few purples and a pink on offer, but why would i buy it? they were all the same price as the wear level above them (mm has fn cost, ft had mm cost) so why wouldnt i just buy off the steam market instead?

reddit.com
u/ProbablyNotTheCocoa — 14 days ago

As we are slowly approaching the ditter match, it seems to me like that is gonna be the point where Sigiswald oversteps and loses his duchy if not his life too, especially due to the repeated mention of lethal ditter weapons this volume. If so, do you think there is going to be another reorganisation of the «troublesome» duchies? Or are they most likely just going to get new Archduke houses?

reddit.com
u/ProbablyNotTheCocoa — 18 days ago
▲ 11 r/PERU

Hello, i dont know if this is appropriate place to post, nor if English is allowed, so i apologise in advance if it isnt. I am currently working on a project which touches upon the Inca Empire, and im trying to figure out what the population wore during the Inca Empire time. So far ive found that clothing was pretty standardised across the civilisation, that men generally wore unku tunics and cloaks and women anaku dresses and shawls featuring various motifs, is this correct? If so what else did they wear? Did royals and other elites wear different things? What adaptations did the clothing culture take one following the colonial period? Any help is greatly appreciated

reddit.com
u/ProbablyNotTheCocoa — 19 days ago