Filoni got away with his OCs stealing Star Wars because most Disney SW fans are biased because they grew up with TCW.

I think everyone knows by now that Filoni has essentially taken over Star Wars. The actual real Star Wars, the one led by the films and beloved characters from Luke, Leia, Han, etc., to Obi-Wan, Anakin, Padme, etc., is long gone. It's merely a background afterthought in the modern Filoni playground that is Disney Star Wars, where his characters rule. Ahsoka basically appears in 90% of media and has far more importance nowadays than Luke (when was the last time Luke did anything of real importance again?) or even Anakin. Filoni's other OCs are slowly replacing existing characters, like Din Djarin replacing Boba Fett or the Bad Batch replacing Delta Squad. And I always wondered why Disney fans ate it up.

Just yesterday, I was arguing with someone over the inhibitor chip question. And, despite me repeatedly asserting the fact that basic evidence proves that Lucas never considered the idea from 2005 to 2014 that Order 66 was brainwashing, that TCW retconned it, and that assuming that people (including people talking to Lucas on the daily) got Revenge of the Sith wrong for nine years while Lucas had some "master plan" was absurd, my opponent was unable to conceive the idea that Order 66 was brainwashing, and he mentioned the idea that the chips "replaced their personalities" which I found absurd because the clones didn't have their TCW personalities until 2008. And today, I stumbled across a post on the base Star Wars subreddit where Ahsoka and Anakin were portrayed in the whole Mortis Arc thing as the father and daughter (curiously Starkiller was portrayed as the son), which I was baffled by because while they don't fit the roles from the show, it seems absurd to put Ahsoka and Starkiller of all people over, you know, Leia and Luke. Well, it made me realize something.

How many people who defend Filoni nowadays grew up with TCW and are unable to consider any other media without it? Imagine a TCW fan who watched the actual films years later. Remember, Filoni did a remarkable job sidelining Obi-Wan, Anakin, and the other characters to just about make TCW center on Ahsoka and the clones. To this individual, Ahsoka is basically THE main character of Star Wars. She's the one who participates in 99% of TCW arcs, and she has a bunch of her own. TCW portrays the galaxy revolving around her; her expulsion is what drives Anakin to the dark, while Padmé is little more than a side character. Now, this fan goes to watch the actual films. He is unable to separate the films from TCW. Hence come the assumptions like Order 66 not working without the chips (because to this man, it's impossible for the clones NOT to be like they were in TCW), and when he sees Anakin's fall, he is so dissociated from what the movie is telling him that he ties it to Ahsoka. "Ahsoka is basically Anakin's little sister or daughter. Who's this Padmé gal? She was in that one Rush Clovis arc, I guess. Why doesn't she dump Anakin?" And, eventually, the dissociation reaches a point where the films become secondary to the show. The Star Wars story isn't about the Skywalkers; it's about Ahsoka and the clones, and the Skywalkers are secondary characters. Remember, nostalgia is one hell of a drug, and these people are addicted to it.

So in comes Disney Star Wars. Filoni, having full control even really as far back as under KK, fully commits to Star Wars being his playground and only makes the actual Star Wars characters appear to try to bring back older fans, though they won't budge. When Disney screws up the sequels, pretty much the entire older Star Wars fandom leaves and becomes distant, no longer really participating in the modern fandom. Who remains? The people who grew up with Dave Filoni's works, those who are being pleased by Filoni following his shenanigans. To these people, the fact that Luke Skywalker hasn't had any real presence since TLJ (and that's TLJ, so calling that "Luke" is questionable) isn't a big deal because Luke Skywalker is a nobody, some random guy from the films. The protagonists are Ashoka and Rex and Ezra and Sabine. Darth Vader is just some guy who appears to be scary sometimes, and Anakin can only be his TCW jocky self. Remember all the hype around Ahsoka and Vader fighting in Rebels? People who grew up with the films or EU couldn't care; it was people who grew up with TCW who saw that as incredible and way better than anything else.

I know this is probably an obvious conclusion to most, but I just needed to get this out there. I now understand WHY Filoni has the massive fanbase he does. Likewise, I'm saddened these people aren't willing to look at the films without TCW or read the EU and not make judgements about it.

reddit.com
u/Proper_Armadillo9583 — 7 days ago

Is there a second Doc in the Eastwood Ravine timeline?

Sorry for asking this; it's probably been asked before, but I'm curious. I will admit I haven't read the comics yet so forgive me if this is tackled there.

So we know Back to the Future operates based on three specific principles:

  1. There are timelines, not fixed loops. So characters don't do the same things over and over and from what we know it isn't necessary for an action to be fulfilled for the reaction to happen. Otherwise, Lone Pine Marty (and other timeline Martys actually) would have travelled to 1955 and messed with Twin Pine Marty's adventure, since these are different people.
  2. The only ripple effect that affects a time traveler is his own death by the time of his existence, I.E., Marty not being born or Biff dying in the '90s. No other changes affect them. We don't see Marty acquire new memories or change looks through his travels through time. Same with Biff, Old Biff does not change looks despite Biff becoming filthy rich in the Hell Valley timeline.
  3. Time travelers, ergo, do not assimilate with their other forms. Twin Pine Marty does not assimilate with Lone Pine Marty or even his own self during his travel in 1955 in the first film when he's searching for the almanac. There can be multiple versions of the same person, be they from the same timeline or from different timelines, at any point in time.

Knowing this, of course, we have to deal with the issue that there are isolated incidents of characters who disappear into points in time where they can't go or which no longer exist. Obviously, Lone Pine Marty at the end of the first film is an obvious example and one that has been theorized a lot about. Another example would be the Marty, Doc and Jennifer who go to 2015 in part II after part III when Marty changes the timeline so that his kids likely wouldn't be messing with Griff and he wouldn't be fired. Another example would be Marty going back to 1885 in the Eastwood Ravine timeline after Doc doesn't die.

The only explanation that, imo, can work is that these are anomalies in time, which "fizzle" in and out and aren't seen again. The multiple Martys who in each timeline go to the Mall to test out the DeLorean, all naturally fizzle out. The Martys, Docs and Jennifers that travel to 2015 fizzle out (Doc would fizzle in himself, as I'll tackle later.) Twin Pine Marty and Lone Pine Jennifer, the only survivors in the timeline, fizzle in at respective times (presumably Jennifer fizzles in after the trio fizzle out and Marty fizzles in later.) An argument that could be made is that timeline jumps from the DeLorean in other timelines creates "anomalies" that fizzle out. So the only jumps that are "real" are the ones done by the DeLorean in THIS timeline, such as Einstein's test jump at the Mall.

So now we come to the end of part III. The issue with part III is that Marty has not just created a new timeline based on his actions in 1885, he creates one at the very beginning of the film when he interacts with 1955 Doc. This is a Doc Brown who knows that he will die in 1885 being shot by Buford Tannen, was likely told by Marty at some point in time about the almanac incident and as such would be wary of traveling to the future and dresses Marty in Hollywood pastiche cowboy costuming to travel back. Notably, if I recall correctly, Doc in 1885 finds Marty's costume absurd and asks who gave it to him. This is because this is Lone Pine Doc, not one of the Clayton Ravine/Eastwood Ravine Docs who WOULD remember the event.

When Marty travels back to 1985 at the end of the film, he has created two successive timelines: at the start of the film, he creates the Clayton Ravine timeline when interacting again with 1955 Doc and giving him all the information on part II and revealing his future death, and then he changes 1885 creating the Eastwood Ravine timeline. The Eastwood Ravine timeline would still have the "anomaly" of Marty going to 1955 Doc and asking him to travel back to 1885 even though the timeline has changed and Marty has already been in 1885. So both Martys in 1955, the one who is sent back to 1985 and the one sent to 1885 fizzle out as their jumps are from previous timelines or whatever. This still causes a bunch of temporal anomalies; for one, Eastwood Ravine Doc has to see his own grave and pictures of him alone in the courthouse construction and the letter from 1885 even though some of these things wouldn't exist. It could be like a false memory, Doc remembers something that isn't there, perhaps because it fizzled in and out. However, this means Eastwood Ravine Doc KNOWS the risks of traveling to the future to check up on Marty's kids, he knows the dangers of time travel, he knows far more than Lone Pine Doc does let alone Twin Pine Doc as a result of Marty telling him.

So when we get to Eastwood Ravine 1985, there's a big problem. Unless Eastwood Ravine Doc fizzled out or something, there's a second Doc in this timeline. Remember, this is not the Doc that takes Marty and Jennifer to the future in part II, that's an anomaly like Lone Pine Marty. He fizzles into time from nowhere, takes the kids and gets out. This is a fixed event in time done by Lone Pine Doc, Eastwood Ravine Doc cannot do it because time travellers do not assimilate with their alternative forms. However, there's an even bigger irony here in that there's also a remaining DeLorean; the one the second anomalous Marty "brings back from 1955", which would be in Doc's garage, not touched since Doc doesn't travel to 2015 to check up on Marty's kids knowing what it will cause, meaning it's not upgraded with all the stuff from later. So now Marty at the end of part III is only saying goodbye not even to his own Doc, as Twin Pine Doc is dead in his timeline and Marty is completely gone, but rather to Lone Pine Doc alone, as there's a living, breathing Doc in this very timeline he'll meet the second he comes around his garage, alongside another DeLorean. And a comical result is this means the three protagonists are from different timelines: Marty is from Twin Pine and fully remembers his loser family and the events of the films (being the only survivor to know the FULL tale), Jennifer is from Lone Pine and remembers the McFlys as wealthy but still remembers Clayton Ravine and the old 2015 future where Marty is fired, and Doc is from Eastwood Ravine and genuinely doesn't know anything beyond what the multiple anomalous Martys told him in the past about what happened, an experience that may have scared him enough not to mess with time travel beyond building the original DeLorean to prevent two Martys from existing in the same timeline. So the end of part III really isn't that sad once you consider Marty is going to meet Doc again in a few days or even hours. I don't think I need to say it but this also screws up the game since Doc wouldn't be missing from his garage and it wouldn't be sold off.

Sidenote: Not sure if this is tackled in any supplementary material, but considering the one-week timespan that Doc has the DeLorean in his garage and studies it while working with the first time traveling Marty, and his later analysis in part III which allows him to build replacement parts for integral aspects of the vehicle in 1955, it's very likely that Doc could have built the DeLorean possibly as far back as Lone Pine without wasting his family fortune and committing tax fraud with his estate (which he later sold to investors) all for R&D since that's where most of the spending would go to. Meaning Doc is likely considerably richer in every timeline except Twin Pine when he was genuinely broke. Eastwood Ravine Doc would likely be pretty well-off. Hell, maybe in this timeline the Libyans didn't come for him. Or perhaps he couldn't get plutonium anywhere else or wanted to preserve the event. Who knows.

u/Proper_Armadillo9583 — 11 days ago

Mandatory EU TIE Avenger appreciation post

It seems like with the Andor show, the classic TIE Avenger has been all but relegated to the annals of history, to where there was even a recent post in this subreddit arguing that the TIE/x1 Advanced ought to be mass produced. So I felt it necessary to remind people it does exist in the EU continuity, that it was the ORIGINAL TIE Avenger craft.

u/Proper_Armadillo9583 — 1 month ago
▲ 137 r/clonewars

Even if we limit clone legion painting schemes to Phase II (which TCW contradicts), so-called "shiny" clones from reserve forces or others ought to retain their Phase I commander color scheme. It just looks quite good on Phase IIs.

Credit to ElMengu for the images.

u/Proper_Armadillo9583 — 1 month ago

Unpopular opinion: The Imperial-Class and Victory-Class sound better when using the Saxton naming convention.

Imperator-Class and Victor-Class, beyond just sounding far more intimidating and domineering, are consistent with the other Saxton-named vessels which have become commonplace. I also agree with him that Imperial Star Destroyer is confusing, at the very least externally, because any star destroyer is Imperial as long as it belongs to the Galactic Empire. In fact, that was most certainly the intention Lucas had when writing the script rather than it being the literal name. I feel like if D6 and pre-RotS Cross-Sections media hadn't established that as the only name the ship had, at the very least Imperator would have become far more prevalent as a term.

That being said, I wonder what Latin names the Allegiance and Turbulent-Classes would get. I haven't been able to come up with any great names personally, so maybe someone else has some good ideas for them.

u/Proper_Armadillo9583 — 1 month ago
▲ 386 r/clonewars

Very unpopular opinion from someone that doesn't care much about the clones being personalized and individualistic: I enjoy the V-Wing helmet more than the open helmet in Episode III/TCW.

It just reminds me more of Stormtroopers. I wish it made a comeback under the Empire for its gunships and other vehicles.

u/Proper_Armadillo9583 — 1 month ago

What design for the Sentinel-Class Shuttle do you prefer?

As the title states. I personally lean far more towards Henry's design despite my EaW days making me slightly nostalgic for the classic flat Sentinel. Also, Henry made a cargo variant of the Sentinel which I enjoy a lot, seeing as I'm very pleased with the Disney-era black-orange color combination for cargo transports. Regardless, I'd like hearing what other people have to say.

u/Proper_Armadillo9583 — 1 month ago
▲ 501 r/StarWars

I firmly believe Storm Commandos ought to be the Imperial equivalent to ARC troopers, and are extremely underrated.

Storm Commandos, by role, generally speaking behave very similarly to ARC troopers. We all remember the moments where ARC troopers single-handedly take down hordes of droids or Separatist soldiers but ARCs would logically be more tied towards stealth ops, guerrilla warfare and covert missions; perhaps some leeway with the Imperial Commandos exist (if those do still exist later on into the timeline, as they've stayed behind in Legends for quite a while), but I think Storm Commandos could be more variable like ARCs are. They also just look quite fine.

u/Proper_Armadillo9583 — 1 month ago

Why did the Stormtroopers storming the Tantive IV (which are confirmed to be Fett clones per Battlefront II) have a completely different accent?

Now obviously, the external reasoning is obvious in that A New Hope was released decades before the establishment of the clones let alone the 501st. The stormtroopers canonically went through flip-flop phases of being clones and being conscripts through the evolution of the EU: The pretty famous Soldiers of the Empire! article in Poster Monthly #4 had Anthony Fredrickson directly call them clones, which was contradicted by other mentions of conscription including Zeth Durron in the Jedi Academy trilogy; by 2002, WotC released their ANH card set which names all stormtroopers in the film explicitly as "clone stormtrooper" and after RotS Lucas did a couple interviews here and there explaining he did view the stormtroopers in the films as clones, though later EU media would overall largely contradict this and lean more with the angle of clones being slowly phased out for other clones and mainly conscripts.

Battlefront II was the main source on the formation of the 501st before and after the Empire. As stated in the Kamino mission:

>Future clones would be bred from a variety of templates. Though the 501st itself remained pure, the rest of the Imperial Army gradually became more and more diverse. We never really got used to the new guys.

Battlefront II also confirms it was Vader's Fist which boarded the Tantive. Now, obviously assuming that characters like Daine Jir or Praji are not part of the Fist and rather other officers from the Devastator, that still doesn't explain why the commander (or lieutenant or whatever role he does have) who tells Vader the Death Star plans aren't in the Tantive's main computers is voiced by Terry McGovern in an explicitly American accent, or why the stormtroopers who stun Leia also have an American accent, etc. Has this ever been tackled?

reddit.com
u/Proper_Armadillo9583 — 2 months ago
▲ 285 r/saltierthancrait+1 crossposts

Ironically released not that long before I posted my other EC Henry post: Henry correctly calls out modern ILM for overusing the Imperial crest on every vehicle

And I must wholeheartedly agree. Modern Star Wars has an obsession with trying to make it obvious the Empire is like the nazis with constant banners and logos everywhere, but it makes vehicles and ships look off and almost insecure that they're not recognizable.

The Original Trilogy was able to make it clear that the Empire was authoritarian and soulless without relying on putting its logo everywhere. In fact it purposefully goes against the Prequels using the Republic logo a lot.

Anyways, great video as always. Dude never misses a beat.

youtube.com
u/Proper_Armadillo9583 — 2 months ago

Since some people in this server seem to be unaware of EC Henry's LA-AG (Low Altitude Assault Gunship), I'll present its cargo variant: the LA-CH (Low Terrain Cargo Hauler)

Not much to say. The ship's stats or backstory haven't ever really been provided, and it's hidden in one of Angelos' Artstation posts, so I felt people ought to know more about it.

Obviously not mine, before anyone asks.

u/Proper_Armadillo9583 — 2 months ago

Why were the Kaminoans so terrible at making loyal, independent clones?

Pre-TCW. The chip would probably make all this irrelevant.

When one takes a look at all the different "commando" clones which were given more individuality, it's striking how many of the ones we know about ended up sacrificing their loyalty to the Republic to where their supposed skills became irrelevant. Consider for a sec:

  • All of the Null-Classes, which were given to Kal Skirata and became major liabilities.
  • Most of the Alpha-Classes. We know of only three which seemed to be relatively loyal: Alpha (who even then was highly independent, deciding to destroy the clone batches due to Jango's orders rather than what the Republic desired, and may have refused Order 66), Jangotat, and possibly Fordo if he's an Alpha. All the other ones were far too independent, ranging from wanting to merely leave the Republic to being Spar who literally became Mandalore for a period. This was such an issue that the Republic had to waste manpower with shadow trooper squads tracking down rogue ARCs.
  • A bunch of the RC units. Omega Squad had Darman fall in love with a Jedi and the team almost completely desert, being foiled and forced to work for the Empire against their will. Ion Squad completely refused Order 66 and Vader had to go there in person. Hyperion and Yayax Squad also deserted. Delta Squad was on the verge of deserting for Sev before Boss put them in their place. We know of maybe a couple RC squads at best that followed Order 66 and became Imperial, like Aiwha Squad. In fact, the idea of letting them be trained by Mandalorians and Corellians seems quite horrid retrospectively, as unlike Jango who may have the motivation against the Jedi or due to payment by Dooku, these people all have different agendas they could implant into these commandos.

I know a large chunk of these probably come down to happening during the Traviss era when every clone was super Mandalorian and defected. Content not affected by that era had more loyal clones (like Cestus Deception's Jangotat, Genndywars' Fordo or Clone Wars Adventures' Aiwha Squad). But frankly, it seems like commandos were a terrible idea, as the ones we do see seem to have overwhelmingly become a thorn in the Republic/Empire's side.

reddit.com
u/Proper_Armadillo9583 — 2 months ago

How would you describe Fordo's personality?

Hello, StarWarsEU. I come at a time of need. See, I've been writing a small thing on various clone troopers and their personalities, including headcanons obviously. I came to this server specifically because I believe that if I asked this in the main SW server, I'd have an influx of overwhelmingly TCW-focused fans who'd probably define Fordo in a very similar way to how clones are defined in that show. I have no issue with involving TCW necessarily, but I think this place may have a bit more balance between TCW fans, MMP fans, or both.

ARC-77 from the Clone Wars 2003 show is a notably mysterious ARC trooper, owing to his singular appearance in the show itself. He's lightly described in Insider 84's Guide to the Clone Army (see second picture) by Traviss and Kaufman as defined by aggresive, over the top tactics (notably being attracted to heavy firepower over pure strategizing), and and a sense of honor as he gives one of the fallen Muunilist 10 troopers the Chancellor's Service Medal he gained during the war. Apart from that, he has basically no real appearances anywhere afterwards despite how beloved a character he is.

I must admit, I have major issues with his portrayal per Traviss. First, it states that Fordo does not bother with subtlety or tactics and is attracted to heavy firepower. This contradicts his first appearance, where he and the Muunilist 10 are on an infiltration mission to the tower bunker where San Hill is located, and while they do deal with droid sniper units and an AAT tank with some heavy force, it remains a clear display of stealth rather than brute force. In fact, Fordo is known for his usage of hand gestures to direct troops except when he needs to talk to indicate more complex orders, which is different to most other clone commanders from what I've seen. The article claims his love of firepower is the reason why he brought in various heavy weapons to Hypori, but considering how General Barrek described the complete annihilation of his forces (which as we see, includes various Acclamator ships) and the death of various Jedi, and how his hologram was seen actively avoiding a barrage of blaster bolts (not even counting his mention of an "unstoppable droid general"), it seems reasonable to bring in some heavy troops since a stealthier evac may be impossible. Furthermore, Fordo certainly does not appear gun-ho when he overrules Mundi's orders to keep battling Grievous, correctly assessing that it'd be a horrible idea and evacuating the survivors. As such, I generally have to question the reasoning behind Traviss' personality description.

An interesting thing with Fordo is that, assuming he IS an Alpha-Class ARC (which is never confirmed, he's known as ARC-77 rather than Alpha-77 or A-77, but considering his skills seen on Coruscant and his double digit code which goes against how other clones trained under the ARC program even in the EU, such as Clone Commanders, all retain their specific desgination codes such as "CC" alongside usually a four digit code, it seems more than reasonable he would likely indeed be an Alpha-Class), he appears to quite well-behaved and loyal. Compare 77 to most of his fellow brethren-in-arms: 17, Alpha, is extremely curt and has no tolerance for any sort of incompetence or anything that isn't up to his quite high standards, as well as having no issues directly conflicting with upper command and being direct in his displeasure and even executing orders without anybody else's permission, such as his attempt to blow up the Kamino cloning pods (granted, that was at Jango's request, but it still disobeyed Republic command); 02, Spar, is obviously a complete anomaly in his recollection of Jango's complete memories and him becoming Mandalore; Tavo tried to desert; 30, Sull, succeeded in that regard; 26, Maze, developed opinions on the regime and eventually deserted alongside the Nulls; 66, Muzzle, became a mercenary after the war (granted, not during, so he may have been loyal to the system and grew discontent with the Empire. Who knows.) Meanwhile, Fordo notably seems to lack any sort of natural disrespect for authority, even if he does feel willing to disobey when his orders are self-defeating; he appears to lack any sort of cynical views or humor compared to 17. In fact, in some regards he seems relatively similar to Jangotat from Cestus Deception perhaps? Not sure but he doesn't seem to share the traits other ARCs from the Traviss era seem to have.

And this is where I ask of people who are far better read than me (because it's taken me a while to research some of this stuff, but I'm sure there are people here far more knowledgeable than I am: what would you say Fordo is like? I understand that he's a vague character to define as he basically has no media beyond Genndywars, but while I've determined my own opinions, I believe others could help me rethink some aspects. For one, I think Fordo COULD be defined by his professionalism even more than the other ARCs, as he seems to not be particularly defiant or aggressive. From that single trait, I've personally made some assumptions, but I'm not wholly certain. So if anybody can help me with this, I'd really appreciate it.

Apologies if the post is a bit confusing or if I made any big mistakes. Thank you.

u/Proper_Armadillo9583 — 2 months ago

This song being sung by two animatronics (check the description of the video to go to another one which has clearer lyrics)

Just got this video randomly recommended and I quite like the song. Haven't been able to identify it with any tools though. Can anybody help? Thanks in advance.

youtu.be
u/Proper_Armadillo9583 — 2 months ago

Is Naboo largely pro-Imperial and militarist, or anti-Imperial and pacifist?

I've been wandering about this for a little bit and I wanted some other opinions as I often do. So, reading about Naboo's culture, I noticed that despite them having a clear military security force including starfighters (and not just the N-1s if we follow Galactic Battlegrounds), stories like The Starfighter Trap in Gamer 1 portray the Naboo as fervently pacifist to the point of essentially disowning sons if they indulge themselves in any militarist occupation (granted, it could be exclusive of the family in that specific story but we do get hints there's more). However, they don't seem particularly heartbroken like Padme does in The Phantom Menace when driving the Federation out requires an all-out warfare including collaboration with the Gungans (which would presumably be seen as violent monsters since they are actively far more willing to deploy military assets than the Naboo per at least that story).

So I started thinking, would Naboo change its mind later on? The total conquest of the planet by the Trade Federation could easily push a lot of people to support the Military Creation Act and the fact Palpatine, a beloved local celebrity as the senator for the planet, was selected as Chancellor would breed a lot of nationalistic fervor for the man. And then of course we have the repeated assassination attempts on Padme through AotC and whatever different battles occurred on Taboo during the Clone Wars, as well as tragedies suffered by Padme herself, now turned senator (note that we know that Nute has a vendetta against her so who knows how many things he tried.)

Then we reach the Imperial era. For one, Padme dies due to broken heart but through Imperial propaganda that could be used to blame the Jedi and push the Naboo more towards supporting the Empire. We know for a fact that Panaka became Moff, and while that largely happened because of his personal attachment to Sidious, it's likely he would gain a lot of support as a national war hero and aide to the beloved Padme. But then we also know that there was a Rebellion brewing in Naboo, per Galaxies and Battlefront II where the new queen, Apailana, gets assassinated by the Fist for harboring Jedi fugitives, which we do not know how that affected the Empire's reputation. We also, as far as I know, know not how they reacted to Alderaan. We do see a massive celebration at the end of RotJ but that cannot be at that point in time since per other media Panaka remains Moff of the Naboo sector and an Imperial Remnant for a long period until he retires when Naboo officially joins the New Republic years later, meaning either Panaka got kicked off his own center of power or that scene happens in the future.

So, what would most of the Naboo be at the time of the Empire? Militarists? Pacifists? Imperials? Rebels? Would there still be a lot of jingoism for Palpatine, Padme and Panaka? Would Luke and Leia being confirmed as Padme's sons push people to rebel or even leave Naboo, or would the Naboo system of monarchy keep most people attached to whatever (presumably pro-Imperial) regent rules after Apailana?

reddit.com
u/Proper_Armadillo9583 — 2 months ago

All ships ought to look different

One thing I REALLY despise is when ships are just slight modifications of one another. Picrel is a Fractalsponge comparison between the Vindicator, Enforcer and Immobilizer/Interdictor. Now, while I have absolutely no issue with both the Vindicator and Interdictor existing, as the interdiction bulbs are defining shapes, I find the Enforcer insanely lazy.

I believe George Lucas had it right when he explained that every ship ought to have a recognizable silhouette that distinguishes it from any other ship. Had some EU writers made the OT, I feel the TIE variants would all share the same wings and barely look different, for example.

u/Proper_Armadillo9583 — 2 months ago

The Eta-2 and V-wing ought to be Sienar products.

Less of a canon thing and more just my opinion on how these ships are and how I think they ought to be.

Anyone who has watched RotS will very well know that the Eta-2 Actis and the Alpha-3 Nimbus V-Wing both serve as evolutionary steps to the TIE Fighter. This is obvious from not just their design, but also the fact that the V-Wing can be heard making the iconic TIE noise at the end of RotS, presumably a few years into the Imperial reign. However, despite these being intended by George Lucas to be precursors to the TIE Fighter in the same way the ARC-170 is a precursor to the X-Wing, these are all Kuat Drive Yards products rather than Sienar Fleet Systems products even with all their aesthetic similarities and mirror designs. The supposed explanation is that these designs MAY have inspired the TIE Fighter, or that they were sold to Sienar, but that's ridiculous. No other fighter has acted like this, and furthermore it doesn't make sense when we consider again that the V-Wing at the end of RotS makes a TIE sound, distinctively produced by its Twin Ion Engine system, which means these are prototype V-Wings outfitted with it. It feels quite odd that Sienar would be using old ships from another company to give new revolutionary sublight thrusting technology to.

I believe the explanation as to why these vehicles are Kuati rests in an unfortunate set of decisions by Curtis Saxton during the writing of his Cross-Sections books. Both the AotC and RotS Incredible Cross-Sections books I think I've traced the first mention of company associations to each vehicle. Now, the thing with the Eta-2 and the Alpha-3 is that, by their names, one can tell that they're intended to be evolutions to the Delta-7, the starfighter flown by Obi-Wan through AotC. This starfighter is also Kuati per the AotC cross-sections. I believe this choice was done because of the triangular ship design: firstly, it mirrors concept art by Colin Cantwell which has the original design for the Star Destroyer (later readded into Disney as the Arrestor Cruiser) shoot out smaller triangular ships, which act as starfighters. Secondly, AotC also introduces the Acclamator, which is a clear precursor to the later Venator and Imperator-Class Star Destroyers. Hence, the film seems to be setting up a trend of triangular ships leading to the final ISD design from the OT, which may be why Saxton decided to make the ship Kuati.

However, when RotS came along, the Eta-2 took the role of the new Jedi Interceptor which the Delta-7 had once had. Despite its visual similarities to the TIE Fighter such as the folding wings that mirror the TIE wings when deployed or the canopy shape, Saxton (be it purposefully or mistakenly) decided to make it Kuati (why he did it is unclear, perhaps due to the visual similarity of having the astromech on the side or perhaps just to continue the trend of Kuati ships. Another reason for this may have been because of Saxton's interpretation that Kuat and Rothana would be producing the majority of Clone Wars vessels as part of their secret deal with Sidious, with the ARC being an exception made as even Saxton saw clearly that it's a precursor to the X-Wing.). Similarly, the V-Wing took the role of the interceptor starfighter design for the clones, and as such he also decided to make it Kuati even though the design very clearly has a lot of notes leading to the TIE. Giving them both names that directly connect them to the Delta-7 in lineage, he put them firmly in the KDY lineage.

And so we got stuck with what George Lucas very clearly intended to lead to the TIE Fighter being largely irrelevant to the TIE Fighter. Funnily enough the Star Courier from Episode I, also intended to be a TIE precursor, was correctly identified by David Reynolds as a Sienar product.

In short, I believe that through basic logic and film theming, these two ships OUGHT to be technically Sienar rather than Kuati, possibly even the Delta-7 too; but Saxton's choices have caused a small, although slightly mendable, hole in the intended visual storytelling.

reddit.com
u/Proper_Armadillo9583 — 2 months ago

Are there three interpretations of Order 66? Which one is more logical?

For a while, I've been tracking what I think are three distinct interpretations of Order 66 that have appeared throughout the years per different writers. I wanted to ask which one would be the most logical choice Palpatine would make for his galactic plan to eliminate as many Jedi as possible. First, some context on the three differing interpretations:

  1. Clones are both aware and actively ready to do the deed: This seems suggested by the film itself, the novel, and Battlefront II 2005. In the film, Palpatine tells Commander Cody: "The time has come. Execute Order 66." Now, while this could be Palpatine gloating, using "the time has come" implies that at least the Clone Commanders were aware of the order being something which would inevitably come at some point. The RotS novelization goes further:

    > A holoscan appeared on the palm of his gauntlet: a hooded man. "It is time," the holoscan said. "Execute Order Sixty-Six." Cody responded as he had been trained since before he'd even awakened in his creche-school. "It will be done, my lord." The holoscan vanished. Cody stuck the comlink back into its concealed recess and frowned down toward where Kenobi rode his dragonmount into selflessly heroic battle. Cody was a clone. He would execute the order faithfully, without hesitation or regret. But he was also human enough to mutter glumly, "Would it have been too much to ask for the order to have come through before I gave him back the bloody lightsaber. . . ?"

    Cody is actively aware that Order 66 would happen and has been trained for it, although still retaining his independence to be able to grumble about Sidious' decision. Battlefront II also has a similar take where the clones actively know about Order 66 arriving per the 501st journal entries (Remember that Order 66 was actively given to all troopers during the beginning of the Jedi Temple raid, so them knowing before even arriving on the steps means they were aware beforehand): >Mygeeto: What Ki-Adi-Mundi didn't know however was that our unit of the 501st was really after an experimental Mygeetan power source that the Chancellor wanted for his "superlaser." Keeping Mundi in the dark wasn't easy; the Jedi had become increasingly wary of the Chancellor's doings, and were on the lookout for the slightest hint of treachery. Just like the rest of them, though, he never caught a whiff of what was really going on, until it was far too late. The success of the mission on Mygeeto was something of a revelation for the men of the 501st. Suddenly, we realized that the Jedi could be fooled. And if they could be fooled, they could be killed.

    >Felucia: When the 501st was finally rotated out of Felucia, Aayla Secura made a point of seeing us off personally, calling us "the bravest soldiers she had ever seen." It's a good thing we were wearing helmets, because none of us could bear to look her in the eye.

    > Coruscant: What I remember about the rise of the Empire is... is how quiet it was. During the waning hours of the Clone Wars, the 501st Legion was discreetly transferred back to Coruscant. It was a silent trip. We all knew what was about to happen and what we were about to do. Did we have any doubts? Any private, traitorous thoughts? Perhaps, but no one said a word. Not on the flight back to Coruscant, not when Order 66 came down, and not when we marched into the Jedi Temple. Not a word.

    The notable aspect of Battlefront II's interpretation is how the clones seem actively ashamed of their future actions. This seems to contradict both the novel's interpretation, where at least Cody seems not to have felt anything for Kenobi when betraying him. Now, the big thing with this explanation is: do only the Commanders know, or do all clones do? Could a clone be compelled to confess, or is their intense biological programming capable of keeping them quiet out of sheer loyalty to Sidious? Do RCs and ARCs know and comply with it, or would they rat it out sometimes out of disagreement with the Republic?

  2. Clones are aware of the Order, but it's just one of many: Also known as the Contingency Orders interpretation. Supposedly began by the RotS junior novelization, although I question that the following passage can be interpreted only that way:

    >Darth Sidious—Chancellor Palpatine—stood alone in his enormous office. He’d sent his new apprentice and a battalion of clone troops to the Jedi Temple. That would take care of the Jedi on Coruscant. He scowled slightly under his hood. He sensed that his apprentice was not yet as fully committed to the dark side as he should be. Well, destroying the Jedi here should certainly tie Anakin closer to his Sith identity—Darth Vader. Now it was time to deal with the rest of the Jedi. The frown vanished, replaced by a smile of anticipation. Reaching out, he keyed a frequency into his hologram projector, and waited. A small hologram of the first of the clone commanders sprang up before him. “Yes, my lord?” “The time has come,” Darth Sidious said, savoring the words. After a thousand years, the time for revenge has come at last. “Execute Order Sixty-six.” “I understand, my lord,” the clone commander replied, and the image winked out. Darth Sidious keyed in the next frequency, and another, identical hologram appeared. Again and again, he repeated the same words to clone commander after clone commander, on world after world. With every message, his faint smile grew. The clone troops followed orders. That was, supposedly, why each battalion was led by a Jedi. What the Jedi had forgotten was that the clones served the Republic, not the Jedi Temple…and he, Darth Sidious, was the Supreme Chancellor of the Republic. The clones would follow the Chancellor’s orders unquestioningly. Even if they were ordered to kill their Jedi leaders. Order Sixty-six commanded the clones to do just that. Still smiling, Darth Sidious leaned back, picturing the scenes all over the galaxy. Jedi on jungle planets, crystal worlds, water worlds, in the heat of battle and safe in their command centers, all dying at the hands of their own clone troops. He could sense it happening, though not in detail—but he could feel the dark side growing stronger with every Jedi death. His only regret was that he couldn’t be there in person to watch each one of them die.

    One could argue that the following quote from Pablo Hidalgo in Insider 83, published on August 8th 2005, was the real beginning: > Order 66 is not some pre-programmed genetic trigger. It's not some Manchurian Candidate brainwash button. It's rather just one of a catalog of orders that clone commanders and their soldiers are trained since birth to follow without question. It identifies their generals, the Jedi Knights, as traitors to the ideal to be dealt with accordingly.

    But I, personally, associate this much more with Karen Traviss, as further detailed in her Republic Commando books, including True Colors: > Order 4: In the event of the Supreme Commander (Chancellor) being incapacitated, overall CAR command shall fall to the vice chair of the Senate until a successor is appointed or alternative authority identified as outlined in Section 6 (iv). Order 5: In the event of the Supreme Commander (Chancellor) being declared unfit to issue orders, as defined in Section 6 (ii), the chief of the defense staff shall assume GAR command and form a strategic cell of senior officers (see page 1173, para 4) until a successor is appointed or alternative authority identified. -From Contingency Orders for the Grand Army of the Republic: Order Initiation, Orders 1 Through 150, GAR document CO(CL) 56-95

    > Order 65: In the event of either (i) a majority in the Senate declaring the Supreme Commander (Chancellor) to be unfit to issue orders, or (ii) the Security Council declaring him to be unfit to issue orders, and an authenticated order being received by the GAR, commanders shall be authorized to detain the Supreme Commander, with lethal force if necessary, and command of the GAR shall fall to the acting Chancellor until a successor is appointed or alternative authority identified as outlined in Section 6 (iv). Order 66: In the event of Jedi officers acting against the interests of the Republic, and after receiving specific orders verified as coming directly from the Supreme Commander (Chancellor), GAR commanders will remove those officers by lethal force, and command of the GAR will revert to the Supreme Commander (Chancellor) until a new command structure is established. -From Contingency Orders for the Grand Army of the Republic: Order Initiation, Orders 1 Through 150, GAR document CO(CL) 56-95

    In this interpretation, clones know about Order 66 as one of 150 Contingency Orders designed for different emergency situations. This one does have the inherent benefit of giving the Order leeway as merely a defensive measure alongside Order 65, hiding it in plain sight. An interesting result is that some troopers believe the Order to have either been sent as a mistake or a Separatist trap, and refuse to act on it, such as Ion Team in Dark Lord: The Rise of Darth Vader. Some ARCs and RCs refused the Order out of personal principles due to their increased independence.

  3. Mind control. The inhibitor chips from TCW. Now obviously these contradict what Hidalgo said earlier on, but they make sense with TCW's individualization of clones. Of course, this brings the issue that nobody ever detected these microchips even during head scans, nor did they ever trigger in a way similar to how Tup had one misfire despite the large scale of the war. These can also be removed, and clones with enough willpower can temporarily overpower them.

So anyway, which one would be the most realistically successful at achieving Sidious' goals long-term? Apologies if the post was a bit too long.

reddit.com
u/Proper_Armadillo9583 — 2 months ago
▲ 62 r/MawInstallation+2 crossposts

Has the TIE Fighter been mistreated?

Yes, following up on my A-Wing post with a related topic based on various comments I received. Anywho, the TIE Fighter for the longest time has been an absolute joke as it is an easily destructible starfighter known for being mocked by anyone fighting against them, to the point Kyle Katarn calls TIE pilots suicidal. But have they been mistreated by lore?

Of course, we know for a fact that I'm ANH they are most certainly competent. We only see a single squadron of circa ~12 TIEs be launched by Vader as Tarkin refuses to deploy any defensive measures, viewing the Rebel attack as a pitiful desperate attempt. These fighters successfully take down a large chunk of the 30 Rebel fighters deployed, leaving only around 2-5 fighters alive depending on your source. Some TIEs die as well, of course. But one could argue that these are Vader's elite pilots and normal pilots would be far more incompetent.

Thematically speaking, people tie the TIE Fighter's disposability to an Imperial doctrine of troopers not mattering. At the same time, pilots take time and money to train, and certainly giving supposedly elite troops like Vader's (presumably clone-based) forces these weak fighters with no shielding or life support or anything of the sort would be wasting good troopers. Regardless of how big the Empire is, training takes time and investment. Similarly, I've heard that the Empire were "equipping themselves for a war closer to the Clone Wars", but even then would TIEs fare any better than V-Wings, Torrents, Headhunters and ARCs at defeating the Separatist forces? Particularly considering how there isn't much evidence of alt fighters like the Starting being used en masse like the ARC was (although this may be a case of media just not focusing on it)

Finally, overall, how badly have games like D6 treated the TIE Fighter and degraded the threat it poses? Do you believe they worsened them, merely kept them similar to how they were or improved their lore? I'd like some opinions on the topic. Thank you.

reddit.com
u/Proper_Armadillo9583 — 2 months ago

How does the A-Wing have a hyperdrive?

In A New Hope, Obi-Wan explicitly says that a ship as small as a TIE Fighter is incapable of operating in deep space, which most likely refers to having a hyperdrive at all. This is followed up in the Prequels with the Delta-7 and Eta-2 lacking hyperdrives and instead using hyperdrive rings. How come the A-Wing, only slightly longer than the Eta (at 6.9m) and shorter than the Delta (although admittedly bulkier, but not enough to seemingly fit one) has not just a working hyperdrive but a class 1 one while also having advanced sensor capabilities and considerable weaponry? Would George Lucas have given it a hyperdrive ring had he come up with the idea before RotJ?

reddit.com
u/Proper_Armadillo9583 — 2 months ago