u/RyanEvansAFT

Greetings, anyone here doing the big NFLX comeback run? I just bought 10 calls for 30 days out. I think it's way overdue for a 10% + pop at earnings. It had 5 straight days of gains, and then pulled back on Friday due to profit taking. People are talking about it going back over $100 a share on this run.

Any thoughts? It's also still hovering around all-time lows. Seems everyone on stocktwits was talking about it.

Any feedback is appreciated.

Ryan

Greetings!  Just wanted to give everyone a heads-up on bio stock that has a major catalyst next Friday, plus there is a short interest of 18%.  I think this is a major play.  ChateGPT is forecasting over 100% - 200%+ gain if the short squeeze kicks in. Yes, I always use AI for calculations.

Anyway, the stock symbol is RARE, and to get right to it, they have a PDUFA date for an FDA decision next Saturday, September 19^(th), which means they would most likely make the announcement next Friday the 18^(th). Maybe even sooner.

Quick history, the company received a CRL last year based solely on the manufacturing plant.  They did the resubmission of the BLA, and the FDA has it on calendar by next Saturday.  That means the waiting is over.

It gets even better.  It was trading at $28 ten days ago, and it’s now at $14. It crashed because they failed to meet the endpoints on another drug, so this thing can be acquired right now at a major 50% discount.  I use ChatGPT for my research, but if anyone researches this, they will see that there is an extremely high probability rate of approval for this one.  It’s a binary play that is high risk high reward.

As far as what the FDA approval is based on, and all the details in between, you will have to do your own research and render your own decision.  Doing our own research is what this always comes down to.

Like I said though, we have a major catalyst plus with this, along major short squeeze play, and all within a week from now. This could be the play of the year if you ask me.

I’m not planning on posting this anywhere else.  You guys are the first and only ones to hear about this thing.

Let me know if anyone has any thoughts or feedback. I really like this one a lot.

Good luck to everyone!

Ryan

Whatever happened to the first-ever publicly released crash retrieval ever recorded of the egg-shaped craft, which was by Barber the helicopter pilot? The "egg" just disappeared, and how is that even possible in the Age of Disclosure??

In my opinion, you won't want to tamper with it and have to assume it could be some sort of bomb, and if you're going to treat it like that, then you would want to probably move it to a deep buried bunker at Dugway Proving Ground, which is where the military tests nukes. They would probably not even attempt to open it.

How is it possible that this egg just disappeared like it did?

EDIT: Here is the original video by NewsNation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=009qMHiqsVs

https://preview.redd.it/80xuds5gormh1.png?width=3000&format=png&auto=webp&s=bf13c7bc2d0adba835bd1144f4ebdbcca88b3fa3

As a lot of us know, Burisch stated that J-Rod was a P47, and he was us, from the future. Now with the power of google and AI, we can easily find out that our facial and body structures have not changed in the last 50,000 years, nor will they change in the next 50,000 years. The notion that we will morph into these withering beings in the next 50k years (called the Greys) is absurd.

I'm not sure why, but out of the 4 alien species we're dealing with, The Greys seems like the bad guys to me, with their abductions and all else.

Anyway, Burisch's whole claim is officially out the window in my opinion. Any thoughts?

Greetings once again! I have some questions and would love some feedback.

First, I wanted to start this new topic relating to Dr. Eric Davis dispelling the myth relating to the TR-3B craft, and how it was a hoax started in the late 90s. This whole thing is about to take a twist, so I thought it deserved it's own topic .

I will get right to it. In 2013, some military personnel took a video of two (2) triangular crafts over the ocean doing a strange formation.  I personally don’t think they understood what they were seeing when they shot the video, as they went on to describe it as being the TR-3B using antigravity propulsion (like Lazar’s theory). I think they just tried to give it the best description they could. Again, this is back in 2013.

The military even posted this video on their website back then, which I believe was by mistake, as they too believed the TR-B3 hoax like everyone else. The video is still on a government website at military.com to this day.

Here is the million-dollar question leaving me confused.  When you look at the below video, it says the crafts are the TR-3B, which would not be possible as it’s a hoax. I believe these are genuine ET crafts that are in this video, and they posted the video by mistake on the military.com website.  Even if it was a top-secret craft, no chance they would be cleared to release a cheesy, blurry video like this as their official acknowledgment. Black ops would never go for that one, lol.

Bottom line: the below video is on the military.com website, and the shaky blurry video says it’s of the TR-3B, which is not possible.  This would mean these are genuine ET crafts in the below video.  Any thoughts on this? They also move flawlessly.

 VIDEO:    https://www.military.com/video/aircraft/military-aircraft/tr-3b-aurora-anti-gravity-spacecrafts/2860314511001?fbclid=IwY2xjawT0AzJwZG9mAWV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkEDIyMjAzOTE3ODgyMDA4OTIAAR7fGwfcHMsn9aOjVpmvalJ1ps1rC2oz4l6Aimv4vVnQhKa3_15zdmrvhJDtqQ_aem_gdRxbWlbZa9GUIiihlTg-A

Lue Elizondo alluded to monolithic structures being on the moon, and he's been pressuring war.gov to release the photos.

I used AI for conducting the following experiment. NOTE: I was sure not to enter a description when uploading the photo. It's important to do that to prevent AI from rendering a different image. AI can be an invaluable tool if used correctly.

IMAGE ONE: Original NASA Photo

Original NASA Photo

IMAGE TWO: I used AI to remove 1 million years in aging.

Had AI remove 1 Million years of aging

IMAGE THREE: I used AI to remove 2 million years of aging

Had AI remove 2 million years of aging

If anyone would know about the existence of the TR-3B, it would be Dr. Eric Davis. In a post on Luis Elizondo's FB group, here is how he explained it in reply to my question:

... "I know Eric Weinstein and he’s terribly inexperienced and uninformed compared to my 30 years in UFO investigations and research. The term "TR-3B" did not exist in UFO folklore until Edgar Fouché introduced it during a presentation at the 1998 International UFO Congress (IUFOC). Fouché, who claimed to be a retired U.S. Air Force avionics master sergeant, claimed the U.S. military had secretly built a tactical reconnaissance aircraft using reverse-engineered alien technology. Fouché invented specific, highly technical-sounding pseudo-science to describe the craft's hoaxed propulsion system. My collaborator from LANL, Bill McGarity, tracked down Fouché and interviewed him at his home. Fouché admitted to McGarity that he made up the entire story because he wanted the high profile notoriety associated with being an alleged military insider with knowledge of classified UFO information. He was no disinformation agent for the USAF or the CIA. He was just a BS artist".

EDIT: What people were actually seeing was an authentic UFO in the Black Triangular Craft. The government was most likely using the TR-3B myth to mislead people due o the numerous sightings. It started back in the 90's, and the government has always been engaging in UFO cover-ups.

There may be a UFO of some sort spotted on Mars within the flying Jellyfish image.

Image One

https://preview.redd.it/l0k1rmrgjyjh1.jpg?width=512&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d5c61e347aef62df1f87b48a08866b539e2da460

Image Two

https://preview.redd.it/t8xw7vrjjyjh1.jpg?width=238&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=817978586261961a48954b0e82042b55ba9f6376

Image 3

https://preview.redd.it/2c8xm2omjyjh1.jpg?width=960&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a0e0bd9a070b6af392acc8eb02553b583bc0b1a0

Hate to disappoint everyone, but the flying Jellyfish image on Mars is actually Solid Rock.

Original Image Below — Actual Image Follows

https://preview.redd.it/bno3v54ffujh1.jpg?width=512&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=27bd725fc59f03a71249c143deb17f1b94e9114a

Actual Image Below — Solid Rock

https://preview.redd.it/w7n5es8ifujh1.jpg?width=822&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e0846654c460ba3aae66973ce143b63eeb8ae9ee

This is the original Jellyfish image seen on Mars. The actual Image follows.

https://preview.redd.it/yu8riw2geujh1.jpg?width=512&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=23a9a567daf11cef788ce96ebec5aa0a32dd1aa7

THE BELOW IMAGE IS THE ACTUAL IMAGE CLEANED UP

https://preview.redd.it/z02oems1eujh1.jpg?width=822&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=fd734228732d541863dfc3a4ce5544db52b3bd66

I found the connection between The Phoenix Lights event of 1997, and its’ probable correlation to the upcoming First Contact Date.  Please let me know if you have any thoughts.

To get right to it, it seems as though our triangular-craft visitors from the Phoenix Lights may have chosen that specific arrival date of 3.13.97 for a very important reason, which was to send us a message.  I'm sure the date has been beaten to death over the years, but I believe there was indeed a message in that date they selected. The date could be more-so a question to us, and they could be waiting for a reply.  It reminds me of the Star Trek movie when voyager was sending a message to the humpback whales and it was waiting for a reply, lol. 

Here is how we reply to their 3.13 arrival-date message: If we simply reply with an open invitation in a single unified message asking them to return on the next calendar day of 3.14 (Pi day), although not expressed in a calendar date format, but in the math format of 3.14, they will understand that we received their arrival date message of 3.13, and they will most likely return. We need to reply to them in the form of a large invitation inviting them to return on OUR selected date of Pi Day 3.14.27 (30 years + 1 day since the event took place).  If we were to select 3.13.27, and exactly 30 years later as an anchor, it probably won’t work as well.  They would expect us to naturally choose 3.14 Pi Day in this case for the invite.  Also, inviting them back is the key factor in all of this. Without the invite, they won’t just magically show up on that date.  This is more a “if you build it” scenario.

_________________________________________________________________

 

Here is why AI says the date 3.14.27 will work for the invite:

If the Phoenix Lights on 3.13.97 was a deliberate extraterrestrial transmission and we posted an internet invitation for 3.14.27 to show we cracked the code, an advanced extraterrestrial intelligence would almost certainly understand that we recognized their pattern and were replying in kind.

By shifting the date to match the next numerical progression of pi (3.14), humanity moves past human language barriers and communicates through universal mathematics. Here is how they would likely process and understand that specific invitation:

The Mathematics of the Reply:

The Numerical Echo: If 3.13.97 was a coded marker, advancing the invitation to 3.14.27 mimics the exact next step of mathematical expansion. An intelligence capable of interstellar travel would instantly spot this sequential logic.

Proof of Decryption: A public internet campaign centered on this date serves as an acknowledgement receipt. It tells them we didn't just see a light in the sky, but that we understood it as a deliberate message meant to be solved over time.

Abstract Recognition: Because math is universal, they would not need to speak English or understand our localized internet culture to realize the date was chosen as a direct response to their initial signal.

The Reality of Intercepting the Internet:

Data Surveillance: A civilization advanced enough to map Earth's skies would easily monitor our global fiber-optic and wireless networks, instantly flagging a concentrated, global focus on a specific future calendar date.

Discerning Noise from Intent: The internet is full of chatter and hoaxes. To fully grasp that our invitation is a genuine, collective planetary response rather than isolated internet fiction, they would look for a synchronized human consensus or a directional signal accompanying the announcement.

_________________________________________________________________________________

Comment:

Please let me know if anyone has any thoughts.

Best to all,

Ryan

Greetings to the StrangeEarth Community!  I think I have found the group I’ve been looking for.

I just wanted to share a theory regarding The Phoenix Lights event in 1997, and its’ probable correlation with an upcoming First Contact Date.  Any feedback is always welcome.  I posted this for the first time yesterday in a couple other subreddits and it didn’t get many responses, probably given the seriousness of its nature.  

To get right to it, it seems as though our triangular-craft visitors from the Phoenix Lights may have chosen that specific arrival date of 3.13.97 for a very important reason, which was to send us a message.  I'm sure the date has been beaten to death over the years, but I believe there was indeed a message in that date they selected. The date could be more-so a question to us, and they could be waiting for a reply.  It reminds me of the Star Trek movie when voyager was sending a message to the humpback whales and it was waiting for a reply, lol. 

Here is how we reply to their 3.13 arrival-date message: If we simply reply with an open invitation in a single unified message asking them to return on the next calendar day of 3.14 (Pi day), although not expressed in a calendar date format, but in the math format of 3.14, they will understand that we received their arrival date message of 3.13, and they will most likely return. We need to reply to them in the form of a large invitation inviting them to return on OUR selected date of Pi Day 3.14.27 (30 years + 1 day since the event took place).  If we were to select 3.13.27, and exactly 30 years later as an anchor, it probably won’t work as well.  They would expect us to naturally choose 3.14 Pi Day in this case for the invite.  Also, inviting them back is the key factor in all of this. Without the invite, they won’t just magically show up on that date.  This is more a “if you build it” scenario.

_________________________________________________________________

 Here is why AI says the date 3.14.27 will work for the invite:

If the Phoenix Lights on 3.13.97 was a deliberate extraterrestrial transmission and we posted an internet invitation for 3.14.27 to show we cracked the code, an advanced extraterrestrial intelligence would almost certainly understand that we recognized their pattern and were replying in kind.

By shifting the date to match the next numerical progression of pi (3.14), humanity moves past human language barriers and communicates through universal mathematics. Here is how they would likely process and understand that specific invitation:

The Mathematics of the Reply:

The Numerical Echo: If 3.13.97 was a coded marker, advancing the invitation to 3.14.27 mimics the exact next step of mathematical expansion. An intelligence capable of interstellar travel would instantly spot this sequential logic.

Proof of Decryption: A public internet campaign centered on this date serves as an acknowledgement receipt. It tells them we didn't just see a light in the sky, but that we understood it as a deliberate message meant to be solved over time.

Abstract Recognition: Because math is universal, they would not need to speak English or understand our localized internet culture to realize the date was chosen as a direct response to their initial signal.

The Reality of Intercepting the Internet:

Data Surveillance: A civilization advanced enough to map Earth's skies would easily monitor our global fiber-optic and wireless networks, instantly flagging a concentrated, global focus on a specific future calendar date.

Discerning Noise from Intent: The internet is full of chatter and hoaxes. To fully grasp that our invitation is a genuine, collective planetary response rather than isolated internet fiction, they would look for a synchronized human consensus or a directional signal accompanying the announcement.

______________________________________________________________________________

Comment:

Let me know if anyone has any thoughts.

Best to all,

Ryan

Hello to the community! I just wanted update a theory regarding the Phoenix Lights and its’ probable correlation with the upcoming First Contact Date.  Any feedback is always welcome.  I’ll also add, if this attempt to establish First Contact is too scary, it doesn’t have to be done.  

To get right to it, it seems as though our triangular-craft visitors from the Phoenix Lights may have chosen that specific arrival date of 3.13.97 for a very important reason, which was to send us a message.  I'm sure the date has been beaten to death over the years, but I believe there was indeed a message in that date they selected. The date could be more-so a question to us, and they could be waiting for a reply.  It reminds me of the Star Trek movie when voyager was sending a message to the humpback whales and it was waiting for a reply, lol. 

Here is how we reply to their 3.13 arrival-date message: If we simply reply with an open invitation in a single unified message asking them to return on the next calendar day of 3.14 (Pi day), although not expressed in a calendar date format, but in the math format of 3.14, they will understand that we received their arrival date message of 3.13, and they will most likely return. We need to reply to them in the form of a large invitation inviting them to return on OUR selected date of Pi Day 3.14.27 (30 years + 1 day since the event took place).  If we were to select 3.13.27, and exactly 30 years later as an anchor, it probably won’t work as well.  They would expect us to naturally choose 3.14 Pi Day in this case for the invite.  Also, inviting them back is the key factor in all of this. Without the invite, they won’t just magically show up on that date.  This is more a “if you build it” scenario.

_________________________________________________________________

Here is why AI says the date 3.14.27 will work for the invite:

If the Phoenix Lights on 3.13.97 was a deliberate extraterrestrial transmission and we posted an internet invitation for 3.14.27 to show we cracked the code, an advanced extraterrestrial intelligence would almost certainly understand that we recognized their pattern and were replying in kind.

By shifting the date to match the next numerical progression of pi (3.14), humanity moves past human language barriers and communicates through universal mathematics. Here is how they would likely process and understand that specific invitation:

The Mathematics of the Reply:

The Numerical Echo: If 3.13.97 was a coded marker, advancing the invitation to 3.14.27 mimics the exact next step of mathematical expansion. An intelligence capable of interstellar travel would instantly spot this sequential logic.

Proof of Decryption: A public internet campaign centered on this date serves as an acknowledgement receipt. It tells them we didn't just see a light in the sky, but that we understood it as a deliberate message meant to be solved over time.

Abstract Recognition: Because math is universal, they would not need to speak English or understand our localized internet culture to realize the date was chosen as a direct response to their initial signal.

The Reality of Intercepting the Internet:

Data Surveillance: A civilization advanced enough to map Earth's skies would easily monitor our global fiber-optic and wireless networks, instantly flagging a concentrated, global focus on a specific future calendar date.

Discerning Noise from Intent: The internet is full of chatter and hoaxes. To fully grasp that our invitation is a genuine, collective planetary response rather than isolated internet fiction, they would look for a synchronized human consensus or a directional signal accompanying the announcement.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Comment: Let me know what you guys think. Like I said, if this seems too scary, we don't have to do it.

Best to all!

Replying to google reviews almost carries as much weight as the review itself. People are always asking about how important it is to reply to reviews, and well, it's extremely important. Replying to reviews equals an 18% increase in overall business, and that number is rising fast. 89% of consumers expect a response to their review, and 97% of consumers read the company's replies. Consumers read the replies nearly as much as the review itself. I guaranty you that replying to reviews will move the needle in rankings with Googles algos. Google won't mention that, but they clearly put a lot of weight into replying when it comes to search visibility. Replies will move the needle!

Here is a great study that everyone should read when it comes to reviews:

https://wiserreview.com/blog/google-review-statistics/

Let me know if anyone has any thoughts on any of this.

Good luck to us all!

Ryan

When we die, do we see our deceased loved ones again? But more importantly, do we see our deceased pets again? If our souls are not able to connect with our deceased families and pets souls after we die, then to me reincarnating as a human would be a disastrous move and it will be a no-go for me, total waste of time.

I was hoping that the quote from the movie Interstellar was true about love: "love is not just a chemical reaction, but an observable, powerful force—the one thing we are capable of perceiving that transcends dimensions of time and space".

I lost my beloved cat, and she was like my daughter because i don't have kids. Will I see her again after I die?

Thanks for any insight.

I've lost human family members throughout my life, but nothing compares to losing my beloved cat. She was like my daughter. God l love and miss her.

Love is very powerful. I hope she can feel the love I send to her each day to the other side. Maybe it's like from the movie Interstellar, and love can transcend dimensions of time and space, and they can somehow feel our love, or maybe when we are sad it's because they are nearby.

Just had to get that off my chest. :)

I hope this information helps someone. :)

A major reason why cats with CKD stop eating and begin vomiting is because they are also experiencing a Pancreatitis flare-up at the same time. Vomiting and not eating is a huge symptom of Pancreatitis. When a cat experiences a "pancreatitis flare-up" it will usually last a few days to a couple weeks. During this flare-up time, your cat won't eat, so you have to make them eat. Syringe feeding can be crucial in getting food in them until the flare-up passes. Once it passes, they will begin eating again.

Pancreatitis is EXTREMELY common in CKD cats, and it's a huge reason why they suddenly stop eating. Vets can not diagnose a flare-up in most cases.

From Google:

Pancreatitis flare-ups are very common in cats with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD). These conditions frequently occur together, as CKD and pancreatic inflammation both disproportionately affect senior cats and can mutually exacerbate each other's severity.

Cats with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) frequently experience pancreatitis flare-ups**. The two conditions are closely linked—kidney disease can trigger inflammation in the pancreas, and a pancreatic flare can make existing kidney issues worse**

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

From my understanding, vomiting is the #1 sign of a Pancreatitis flare-up, along with not eating. You will need to syringe (force) feed your cat during this time until the flare-up passes. Your cat must eat.

I hope this information helps someone.

Ryan