u/SMTisHighOuter

Bu soruya çok fazla aşırı genelleme yanıtlar görüyorum, bazıları hiçbir fark yok derken bazıları top üniden mezun olmayan doktora gidilmez tarzı şeyler söylüyor. Bence ikisi de yanlış. Fikrimce gideceğiniz fakültenin önemi ne yapmak istediğinize göre değişir

Eğer ben yurtdışında doktorluk yapacağım diyorsanız ilk yapmanız gereken şey herkesin ballandıra ballandıra anlattığı TEPDAD akreditasyonuna değil, şu listeye bakmak. Seçmek istediğiniz fakülteyi bulun ve bakın, sponsor notes kısmında ECMFG notu varsa en önemli kriteri sağlıyor demektir. Ayrıca ABD düşünüyorsanız VSLO listesinde okulunuzun olması ABD stajlarında kolaylık sağlayacaktır, ama bunun için para da lazım o yüzden herkes için çok önemli değil. Eğer Almanya niyetiniz varsa ANABIN sistemine bakın. Fark edeceksiniz ki bu listede Türkiye'deki çoğu okul yok. Bu listedeki okulların yanındaki H+ ibaresi daha önce o okuldan mezun olan birinin başvuru yapıp kabul aldığını gösterir, seçeceğiniz okulun o listede olmaması kötü bir şey değil ancak H+ olan bir yere giderseniz Almanya süreciniz birazcık daha rahat olabilir. Burada önemli olan şey bir okulun yanında H- ibaresi olmaması ki Türkiye'deki hiçbir tıp fakültesinde bu ibare yok. Bundan sonra zaten onlar için yabancı doktorsunuz, nereden mezun olduğunuz kimsenin umrunda değil

Gelelim Türkiye'de çalışmaya.

Eğer amacınız devlette normal doktorluk yapmaksa gerçekten de çok önemi yok nerede okuduğunuzun. Ama yine de devlet okulları vakıflara göre klinik olarak daha iyi bir eğitim verir, hatta bazı vakıflar da klinik eğitimi devlet hastanelerinde verir, bu vakıflar da iyi bir seçenek olabilir

Çok iyi özelde çalışacağım derseniz top üni önemi artıyor. İyi özellerdeki doktorların çoğu top üni mezunudur, ama bunun nedeni top üni mezunu olmaları mıdır yoksa kişisel midir tartışılır.

Fakülte farkının en önemli olduğu yer bence akademisyenliktir. Ders veren hocaların ezici bir çoğunluğu Cerrahpaşa, Çapa veya Hacettepe mezunu. Hatta bunlar arasında Cerrahpaşa diğer ikisine göre daha da fazla, ama bu benim okuduğum okul, sizde farklı olabilir.

TL;DR Yurtdışı veya devlette çalışacağım diyorsanız neredeyse fark yok. Özelde çalışacağım ya da akademisyen olacağım derseniz üst sıralama üniler daha avantajlı

Farklı fikirleriniz varsa yazabilirsiniz

"Did nothing wrong" might not be the best phrase to use here, but I think you will understand what I mean.

Context: Alice Sebold is the author of the memoir "Lucky", in which she describes the EXTREMELY brutal rape she went through and her experiences. Later she accuses Anthony Broadwater, referred to as Gregory Madison in her book, resulting in him being sentenced. However, it turns out that Broadwater had nothing to do with her rape and Sebold only thought it was him, restulting in his exoneration in 2021.

After the news of Broadwater's exoneration, the public opinion on Sebold crashed, many holding her solely, or near solely responsible for the 16 years he lost and his life being hell after he got out due to him being permanently placed on the sex offender registry. However, I believe that she had little to do with what happened to him.

First of all let's start with the fundamentals. After traumatic events, especially on the scale of what happened to her, it is scientifically proven that memories can be significantly altered as a trauma response. Holding her responsible would mean that rape victims should not be allowed to seek justice because the guy they accuse *might* not be the actual perpetrator.

Now let's talk about the details of the investigation and how much of a fuck up the judicial system was. Broadwater's trial was full of errors, ranging from police misconduct to unreliable forensic methods, with the latter being what i believe to be the main cause for Broadwater's conviction. When asked to identify her perpetrator among 4 others in a lineup, she chose the wrong person. Her prosecutor told her that the man she identified was purposefully placed there by Broadwater to throw her off. As for the forensic methods, we have 2 perpetrators. One of them is the pubic hair sample Broadwater agreed to provide. The sample then matched the one found at the scene, however, pubic hair sampling was later found to be an unreliable forensic method. The second one is that during the trial, evidence proving that she was a virgin before her rape, swaying the jury in her favor. Virginity testing is now known to be basically bogus, and there is no way to know whether someone is a virgin or not.

After all this, you may think "She picked the wrong man out of the 5, she knew he was not her assailant". See my first point. The job of the judiciary is not to operate based on emotions, they must conduct their investigations with 100% impartiality, no matter how gruesome a case might be. It is natural for victims of such violent crime to misremember important details of an event, law enforcement is responsible for uncovering the truth and reaching a verdict accordingly. In this case however, they acted not in justice's interes, but self-importance's, they wanted to pat themselves on the back for putting a violent black man behind bars (this happened in 1981, where racism was even more rampant than today)

So, what do I mean by she did nothing wrong? She had every right to seek justice for what happened to her, and it happened to be an innocent man. The judiciary did not do it's job properly and it ended up sending an innocent man to prison while letting the actual perpetrator walk away scot-free. She was just a young woman seeking justice, not some demoness who sends random men to jail for fun, and both Sebold and Broadwater were failed by the system

I am not saying she bears zero responsibility, she does, but a good way to fulfill that would be to do something like sharing her earnings with Broadwater, or support organisations like Amnesty, not to be reduced to an evil false accuser

Boruto is the definition of mid manga. Like it manages to be somehow have a completely flat storyline, characters, and fights and somehow still not agonizing to read. Every 1 month you just read the latest chapter then forget about it until the next chapter. Literally the most 5/10 manga to ever be a 5/10. The anime, however, is actually excruciating to watch

I always wondered this, whenever I see a news article about gangrape, 9 times out of 10 it's from India. Now I know that India is the largest country in the world, but not 9/10 of the population of the world.

What actually makes it so rampant in India? I can not think of a reason because basically anything I can think of is not unique to them, such as sexual repression, rampant misogyny, or poor justice system. All these factors exist in many conservative societies, yet none of them have become synonymous with gangrape like India has.

Edit: To all the racist idiots just spewing hate, i am not your ally

And I don't mean the british type where general practice is a specialty of its own, but the type where a doctor goes straight into practice without further training. For 4-6 years, we are required to learn and pass exams about basically all main specialties, yet when we graduate, 90% (might be an exaggeration) of the knowledge we bust our asses to learn are useless because we are all expected to choose one specialty and then potentially a subspecialty. Basically everyone in the medical world has been conditioned to think that a doctor is a failure unless they choose to hyperspecialize in some topic, this not only leads to extreme competition for residency spots, but more importantly to the impending collapse of primary care. People have forgotten just how important GPs are to the healthcare system. Why is this the case when even a doctor graduating ranked last in their class from the lowest ranked university is practically guaranteed to know the basics about all specialties? Heck, I would even say most people aiming for IM would actually be happy with GP, since it appears that nowadays GPs were made so useless that internists do their job now. Like dude why the fuck do you need to wait for an IM appointment to get treated for primary hypothyroidism or early stage type 2 DM?

To sum all it up, treating GP as a real pathway would lead to:

1. Decreased load off of specialties, especially IM and peds

2. Less competition for residencies

3. Better care for patients, now that they do not have to visit a specialist for basic health problems

Probably a pretty common question, but I would like to ask regarding my own curiosities.

I am from a country where the only things that matter when applying are your university admission exam score, and your GPA (albeit in a much lesser extent).

Maybe this is bias caused by social media, but it feels to me like you need to be either very wealthy or very lucky to get into top schools, I see stories about how students with perfect GPA, god knows how many APs, a gorillion extracurriculars get rejected because "nothing sets them apart from the others". I know international students are treated a bit differently, so ignore them when answering. Does it all come down to luck or connections (like legacy admissions)?

Bildiğim kadarıyla Osmanlı döneminde Üsküdar ayrı bir vilayetti, cumhuriyet kurulduktan sonra mı anadolu yakası İstanbul'a dahil edildi?

The recipe calls for 3 whole eggs to be beaten for a coconut cake, would i get a fluffier cake if i beat the whites seperately or would it collapse?