(Not so) controversial opinion: NPs should only be allowed to treat patients under supervision and NOT be allowed to prescribe medications. Their independence is dangerous.
I’m a psychiatry resident and I’ll say it plainly: I don’t think NPs should be diagnosing and prescribing independently. I’ll focus specifically on psychiatry in this post, although my opinion applies to every medical specialty being infiltrated by midlevels.
Physicians spend 4 years in pre-med, 4 years in medical school and another 4 years in psychiatry residency (add another 2 for fellowship) before practicing independently. Meanwhile, some PMHNP programs accept nurses with minimal experience and provide a fraction of the supervised clinical training. These are not equivalent paths, and pretending otherwise is ridiculous.
Psychiatry is medicine. It requires recognizing medical disease, managing complex medications, and understanding what you don’t know. It is not just matching symptoms to a diagnosis and prescribing an SSRI.
What bothers me even more is patients thinking they’re seeing a psychiatrist when they’re actually seeing an NP. If a patient calls you “doctor,” correct them. Getting a DNP and using “doctor” in a clinical setting only adds to the confusion and should be illegal.
I think we all know why healthcare organizations love independent midlevels. They can pay NPs far less than physicians while having them diagnose and prescribe independently. The organization saves money on doctors, while the patient gets someone with a fraction of the medical training.
Patients deserve physicians, transparency, and better than corporate healthcare cutting corners on their care.
And to all the NPs here who want to argue with me: if your loved one ever needed immediate, life-saving medical care, ask yourself who you’d want treating them, your NP colleague or an MD/DO?