u/SuitableVolume1350

As a forensic psychologist, I have discussed this case with several colleagues, and many of us believe there are indicators that warrant considering the possibility of involvement by someone close to the victim rather than an unknown offender. One potential motive that has been raised is financial gain, such as life insurance or inheritance, although that remains speculative without conclusive evidence.

One aspect that stands out is the reported “letter” referencing her death. If accurately described, its wording appears to establish her death as a fact, which could have legal significance, rather than serving the purpose typically associated with a ransom demand.

Modern kidnappings for ransom are relatively uncommon, and successful ransom cases generally involve clear proof that the victim is alive to encourage payment. In this case, there has reportedly been no such evidence. Instead, various narratives involving cartels or other outside actors have circulated, which raises the question of whether those claims could be diverting attention from alternative possibilities.

Rather than focusing on sensational explanations, I think the more appropriate investigative question is: Who, if anyone, stood to benefit from the disappearance of an ill 84-year-old woman? That, in my opinion, is a more productive line of inquiry than assuming the primary motive was ransom.

I work gigs to help pay some bills on the side, mainly Spark. I find it interesting how the cameras were not able to capture the car entering/leaving the community. It almost sounds like an inside job by someone that works in the community. When I deliver inside those fancy communities they ALWAYS have big cameras near the entry and exit gates. They have a security guard for identification and to call the resident for access, or the callbox with the camera to register your entry. Some of them even have the gates where you cannot piggyback because the gate immediately closes after one car goes through, and if you try, it will damage your car. How is it possible that they have absolutely zero video surveillance/evidence about the car used for the kidnapping? I don’t believe the cartel, Mexico theory. The kidnapping was successful, something that nowadays is extremely hard to do with all the technology available. They are not even that famous to be doing a job like that for ransom.

I do believe that it is an inside job that was paid for by a family member to execute an almost perfect kidnapping. I say almost, because I still have hope her body is found (as I don’t believe she is alive). The easiest murders/kidnappings to solve are from people closest to you, so one like this, were they knew where the cameras were and to go directly there to disable them, that information has to come from someone with direct knowledge on her property.

What are your thoughts?