u/Top_Guess_946

Christianity is a people's movement that suggests people change their ways of thinking, beliefs and personalities based on a selective reading of history.

Any religion that converts people actually suppresses and oppresses their thinking abilities and the inherent 'seeker' in every individual that yearns for truth.

A movement on the other hand comes with its 'program', its 'propaganda' and its systematic design with which reality should be approached and interpreted. A movement sells its ideas and ideals to others and intends to 'recruit' followers to help and expand the movement.

In reality Christianity is just a movement with a price tag for membership. Hinduism is about a way of life. No one can be recruited into a 'way of life'. You are just as you are and you can be what you want to be based on your actions and the fruits of your actions.

If anybody is found to be saying that Islam is a way of life, then counter them by saying Islam is a movement of people. A movement has the following features:

• Collective Action: Movements involve a large number of people working together to pursue a common objective.
• Shared Ideology: Participants unite under a common belief, vision, or set of ideas that serve as the foundation for their activism.
• Sustained Efforts: Unlike sudden, isolated events, movements rely on continuous and long-term action over time.

Tell me how does Hinduism fall into any of the above brackets? Hinduism does not have any collective action, or a single shared ideology or any sustained efforts over a long period of time. Hinduism does not have a future roadmap or a vision or future long term goals to achieve. Islam has a long-term goal to achieve, conversion of the entire world to Islam. That's its agenda.

A way of life is more suitable for Hinduism because Hindus just live their ordinary lives. Live for their household, their families, their social circles and they do not have grand visions and narratives about the world or the future.

Do not Islamists appropriate 'way of life' as a descriptor for their religion. Only Hinduism is a way of life. Islam is a socio-political movement masquerading as a religion.

Should Hindus have some sort of upadhi based on being a learned master of some scripture before they can represent Hinduism at the political front?

Sankaracharyas are largely ignorant of political sciences and often do not have the diplomatic tact to speak on religious and political matters of the day.

So who is in a position to speak for Hindus?

If you are participating in this thread, why do you think you are qualified to speak for Hinduism? Do you know Hinduism deeply enough yourself?

Do you have a roadmap for the future? Do you have a vision for HInduism?

Can you say you can build a roadmap or a vision for HInduism if you don't know Hinduism deeply enough?

How much important is it for you to know about criticism of Hinduism to be able to defend Hinduism against common criticisms that are levelled against Hinduism?

Islam teaches its followers to hate the kaafir, to kill them. Islam teachers its followers to ensure Islam prevails over other systems including democracies. Islam teaches its followers to enslave others if they are caught in a war with Islam, but does not clarify whether they can do that when they are attacked or when they are provoked to attack. There is a difference between the two. If muslims persistently harass Hindus and then when Hindus retaliate, Islamist clergy would define even that as a war like situation while disregarding that retaliation happened because of provocations from muslims.

Leftists see Islamists as an ally because they view Islam as an ideology against colonialism but because of Islam's censorship of any speech criticizing Islam, leftists rarely target Islam's own colonialism and xenophobia. Hating other cultures, religions, thought systems, governance systems just because they are not part of Islam. Telling Islam's followers to not make friends with non-muslims. Telling them to not participate in the religions and festivals of non-muslims. These are examples of racist prejudices for people who do not think the same as Islam. This is nothing but xenophobia.

See how Islamists are camping like a protest. CJP is also doing that.

Islamists are advocating for voluntary arrest to emphasise their 'satyagraha'. Sonam Wangchuk is on hunger strike.

Such styles of protest attract human sympathy, but today we have seen how identity is exploited to weaponize sympathy against people.

Therefore such kind of 'dramatic' methods no longer have a place in today's world where we have our destinies in our own hand without any colonizers or oppressors.

The IB does not possess the legal or operational jurisdiction to authorize a diplomatic or cross-border meeting of this nature. Under the institutional framework of the time, an executive clearance of this magnitude could only be greenlit by a cabinet minister within the UPA government, not by intelligence bureaucrats.

The argument presented demonstrates a catastrophic lack of understanding of Indian polity. This is a transparent attempt to deflect from the severity of the charges. The evidence is airtight, the legal trajectory is clear, and he is fully aware that he faces the ultimate consequence under the law.

For all I know, MOTABHAI will ensure that he's alive to see PoK integrated with J&K. Post which he will be spending his last days in solitary confinement forever.

Kaun Samjhaye Anpadh Ganwaar Indians ko?

So all the leftist librandu arguments about lack of right of fair hearing or representation or procedural lapses not being followed in the case of prosecution of terrorists can be answered back with this. Sublime Software v. Union of India.

Congratulations must be given. We don't celebrate BJP victories enough as a result the nalli opposition gets to create issues / muck senselessly without any kind of rationalistic restraint.

If Pradhan can be criticized for the leakages, then he must also be congratulated for ensuring RE-NEET in record time without any leakages.

Pradhan must also be congratulated for taking the bold step to cancel the previous NEET to ensure that the culprits do not succeed even if collectively everyone had to suffer.

That's ensuring equality of opportunity for everyone because if NEET had not been cancelled then the corrupt candidates could have sailed through on the back of leaked papers. Preventing that was important.

Unfortunately, few children committed suicide. These children were perhaps unsuitable to be doctors in the first place if they are so impatient with any process in life. Suicide was rightly criminalized but softy softy empathetic generation has decriminalized suicide also. Now it's a mental health issue - when in fact committing suicide is actually a final act of courage that transcends any of the soc called mental weakness allegations.

Accepted that there is overlap between Hindu nationalism and Indian nationalism, but also understand that the BJP can function only within that overlap as it is limited by Constitution's secular framework which cannot be pushed beyond a limit.

No where in the world can it ever be accepted that any section of people be treated as second class citizens on the basis of their identity related to sex, religion, caste, place of birth (Article 15). If you think BJP is not a Hindu party because it has not made any section of people second-class, then you can kiss your dream good bye because that's not going to happen anywhere in the world except places like perhaps Iran, Palestine or Afghanistan.

https://swarajyamag.com/politics/why-modis-ministers-need-a-political-operator-class

Raghav Chadha is an excellent example of a politician who has successfully leveraged the power of youth connect. His strategic thinking and focus on youth engagement have made him a crucial asset to his political organization. This dedication to mobilizing the younger generation has had a significant impact on recent electoral outcomes and has shaped his party's future strategy. He has been instrumental in organizing youth wings, leading campaigns, and using social media to reach younger demographics. His ability to connect with young people on a personal level and inspire them to action has been a key factor in his political success. His story serves as an inspiration to young people across the country, showing them that they can make a real difference in the political landscape.

BJP's ministers need a layer of political operators who can inform, influence, condition and guide them on giving sound-bytes to the press. They can't brazen it out like that which is going to make it embarassing for their vote bank to defend them in public. Public will read these as signals to sense a change in tide in the public mood.

BJP must not take it for granted to let its ministers say anything without filters. BJP's ministers are supposed to showcase themselves as leaders and reorient public mindset to an elevated way of thinking. They can't be commenting like ordinary internet users on reddit or instagram.