u/Top_Guess_946

Sadaquat Hussain says cow protection policies are now being questioned for their impact on livelihoods. Why? Because muslim influencers urged their community to not purchase cows for slaughter. Why? Because there is a cow slaughter ban law in West Bengal since 1950. Only that successive governments never implemented the law.

Now, muslims, all of a sudden, have chosen to comply with the laws in their state? If that's so, then why do they not comply with anti-encroachment laws, and also stop performing Namaz in public. Why do they do stone pelting then in defiance of law?

So it's clearly selective compliance with law by muslims, designed to strategically influence Hindu sentiments against BJP.

It also reveals a dangerous potential. The more BJP's followers design their politics around muslims, the more muslims will have a leverage in hurting Hindu sentiments and gain power Hindu psychology to influence their approval or disapproval of BJP.

What do you guys think?

....

What does he mean by bigger issues of the day?
Does he think historical/civilizational/religional issues are not linked to the bigger issues of the day?

https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/delhi/gurgaon-court-grants-bail-manesar-union-leader-ajit-singh-illegal-custody-10696162/

.

Hindus really need to become sharper in the liberal discourse and modern political realities.

Online web portals really need to get strict and serious about misinformation.

Bulldozer action needed.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/patna/boy-beaten-to-death-over-lemon-dispute/articleshow/131047678.cms

On Google Gemini search, I saw earlier that it was mentioning Dalit boy. Now I search, it's not mentioning Dalit boy anymore. It's a Dalit boy because the boy is Paswan.

Lelis want to find fault with SIR, say that EC is hijacked and compromised, while glossing over Mamata's atrocities and TMC's goonda raj.

Exploitation of women by TMC goons at Sandeshkhali barely registers a note with their views and opinions.

It's sad that liberalism, as a virtue is supposed to be secular in nature, but it is weaponized and used against BJP. BJP is criticized on liberal values, but when BJP actually delivers something for liberalism, then the LeLis collectively forget to talk about it.

That is not liberalism. That's tribalism.

There is a clear connection between science and politics.

Science is a measurement technique. Material sciences help measure the physical world which helps with monitoring enemy, surveillance, detection, encryption, hacking, etc.

The more data that governments have, the better and timely their decisions will be. Nehru though the Aksai Chin area was useless because it did not grow even grass. Yet, if that was true, then why was China coveting Aksai Chin area? Surely they knew something about geography of that area which could give them a geopolitical advantage, which Nehru did not know about.

Material sciences is the number one tool that ensures Israel keeps winning even despite being surrounded by hostile nations. Imagine countries like Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE and Bahrain all being anti-Israel, all having fought against Israel in 1948, 1967, 1973, but changed since late 90s and 2000s for diverse reasons. How was that possible? Because Israel stood the test of time. Israel withstood collective military action against the state.

How did Israel do that? By aggressively promoting science and technology. Indians need to study how did Israel create that kind of an academic environment to build a flavour for science and technology that ensures it has political voice today.

India is a much bigger country, and we have lot more resources. Let's not blame reservations entirely. Sure they have their reasons, but let's just focus on the brain drain. Indians use technocratic expertise only to move out to America.

Moving out to America or Europe is considered as the apex move for any person in society. Indian society validates out of India movement as the apex of life's achievement. Why? Sure it may have its own benefits, although it's debatable if we are even making use of the potential that Indian diaspora has in foreign countries, when we compare that with the extremely dominating influence that Islamists have managed to achieve with a population with half the skills as the Indian diaspora.

For a bright future for the country, to ensure that India dominates geopolitically, Indians have to cultivate a love for science and tech. That's the key to ensure geopolitical dominance, hard power, military influence, and superiority.

Well science and tech advancements occur over longer time arcs. At the same time, such decisions are taken politically, and elections decide the governments that would determine education policy eventually and where Indian academia focuses. Public opinion is shaped through commentary on latest developments in the socio-political arena. The commentary on socio-political phenomena is largely informed and influenced by social science scholars. Social science scholars research on society, publish papers such as about caste-discrimination in campuses and use the knowledge of such published papers to influence policy making and decisions of the government. There was sustained discourse development by social science scholars around caste influence in academic campuses that eventually led to the newly proposed UGC rules for caste equality in campuses.

That's why in addition to science and tech, Hindus have to also sharpen their knowledge about social sciences such as sociology, political science, history, and law to be able to generate proper evidence based research and formulate anti-thetical doctrines that can defeat the claims and assertions of leftist scholars.

Do not underestimate public opinion. See how Jews are again being attacked across Europe and America just because public opinion has been shifted by Islamists against Jews. This despite Jews also having suffered in Germany and basically every country they immigrated into. This despite the holocaust and laws against anti-semitism. Some people are not even finding it wrong that Jews are being attacked. How long before this leads to full blown genocide against them? How long before Islamists start targeting Hindus after finishing their project against the Jews? So Hindus, learn to arm yourself with knowledge of social sciences in order to understand the temperament in the public square, and also to be equipped enough to respond back rationally, methodically while using the same frameworks that these social science scholars use.

The Islamists dreams of Gazwa-E-Hind and are willing to wait (have Sabr) for 1000 years. This means Hindus should prepare to defend themselves for 1000 years. Hindus have to help advance science and tech.

Regarding Zubair Ansari's recent lonewolf terror attack, Fadnavis is reported to have called it as an instance of 'self-radicalization'.

The fact is that there's an online network of terrorist influencers who spread the message of religious radicalization, influence people to commit acts of terror.

Lonewolf attacks have occurred in Europe for far too long. They have been getting committed frequently and regularly across all countries in Europe, especially France, Belgium, England.

They are randomly launched to terrorize ordinary folks in Europe. Lonewolf attack is not new.

In fact this way, terrorists need not even be sent from Pakistan. Indian muslims themselves will be radicalized.

Brut carried a report on it. Usually Brut does not cover incidents where Islam is at fault. But this time they covered it. Why? Because they could use the instance of 'lonewolf attack'. The sorry example of a lonely individual who got radicalized by online content, somehow makes the act of terror less fearful and stress ful for the ordinary public. That's the Brut angle.

It's this language games that are used to normalize the impending worse case scenarios in the future. As a result the Indian public does not wake up. They will think oh it's some lunatic.

The thing about monsters is that if you try to explain them, every monster will have a reason. But even Nazi sympathizers and Nazi soldiers had a reason to kill Jews. What was the reason? Nothing sinister. It was just that they received orders from their seniors to commit and carry out such attacks.

Lonewolf terror attacks have been occurring in Europe for so long. Now they are coming to India as well. These are extremely difficult to prevent and predict. Conspiratorial attacks have been successfully prevented by Indian security agencies in an exceptionally well manner.

So many terror attacks have been foiled by our security agencies. That's because when people act as part of a team to carry out common conspiracy, their chatter gets picked up because of the devices that they are using. This kind of advantage is not there in the case of lone-wolf attacks.

Therefore lone-wolf attacks are going to be a huge problem for security agencies to prevent. This will create frustration among the society and the citizenry. It will create issues for security agencies as well. Islamists will exploit the 'imagined' failures of security agencies against being able to prevent such lone-wolf terror attacks for the usual aim of demoralizing the security forces.

Lone-wolf attacks have been studied in Europe since long. Here's a report from 2010.

These lone-wolf attacks are not at all owing to 'self-radicalization'. So Fadnavis and any other BJP leader who thinks this is self-radicalization is actually trying to belilttle the challenge and difficulty of addressing lone-wolf attacks.

https://www.peoplematters.in/news/business/apcr-report-finds-no-proof-of-organised-conversion-conspiracy-in-tcs-nashik-case-49410

1. An organization called "Association for Protection of Civil Rights" (APCR) has come up and given a clean chit against any organized conversion at TCS Nashik.

2. APCR is just an NGO. It has Harsh Mandar as one of the folks in an image of a ceremony published on the website. We know how rabidly leftist Harsh Mandar is. Why is he leftist? Because even though he works for the victims of communal violence, it is almost always the case that he works for giving clean chit to muslims while ignoring propaganda by Islamists. Somehow, just like Congress, for Harsh Mandar, it's always Hindus who give trouble.

3. So, no clue about what this APCR is but just because it's an NGO, it is being used as a 'credentialling institution'. This is where Hindus lack. Hindus do not have their own NGOs and 'secular-liberal-constitutionally' oriented institutions which have street-cred, which can be used to pass judgments.

4. APCR just passed a judgment that there is no organized conversion. How did they do it? They claimed to have gone through FIR reports and noted inconsistencies. Inconsistencies in FIRs is how police rigs investigation. If you bribe police personnel, they will deliberately rig the FIRs and build in inconsistencies so that the prosecution case ultimately fails in the court.

5. Even then how can APCR pass a judgment on the basis of inconsistencies in FIR copies? That's trial by media. Is trial by media available as an argument only when someone is accused by the public? Why is 'trial by media' not available as an argument when someone accused is being given a clean chit. Who is APRC at all to say that there is no case made just by going through the FIRs.

6. Getting a copy of the FIRs is very difficult. Police does not share that easily. How are these organizations able to get a hold of such copies? Did police share the FIR copies with these organizations? Did the accused share copies? How easily Islamists get legal advisory and consultancy for the offences and crimes they are accused of. Somehow when they are the accused, suddenly secularism is in danger and all the free legal aid providers will be galvanized to provide free legal aid to them. Everyday Indians are under pressure to prove their secularism. The tragedy is that instead of acknowledging that muslims put the pressure on Hindus by saying they have to prove their loyalty to the country even when people from their own camp carry out terrorist acts.

7. APCR noted that there are claims of hurting religious sentiments, but there is no evidence of the same. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. It only means that Hindus are generally not aware of their rights. They don't know how to gather evidence. They don't know what evidence to gather. They don't know how to put together evidence as part of a story so as to make their case provable and strong in front of the judge. Police also does not do a good job of investigation. They rely entirely on the victim to provide evidence. If the victim does not bring sufficient evidence, the police also then creates a weak FIR which is not good enough to convict.

8. There is also the allegation that Nashik case was created to cover up the sexual exploitation by astrologist Ashok Kharat.

Despite instances of love jihad being rampant in Hindu mainstream media, it seems a lot of parents are completely oblivious of the phenomena of love Jihad.

How come even today Hindu girls are falling victim to love Jihad. New incidents and reports keep coming in from different parts of the country regarding Islamists following the typical playbook, of recording obscene videos, then using those videos to blackmail to extract even more by forcing Hindu girls to trap other Hindu girls in the same.

What are these Hindu girls getting out of this? It's not as if they are blackmailed on day one. They are talked to sweetly perhaps, they are emotionally manipulated, made to think of the moon and what not. These boys are very friendly in the beginning and then later they exploit them.

Rotherham, Rochdale and what not happened in Britain. It's grooming gang playbook. It's already globally known. In India there was Ajmer, then TCS Nashik. Recently, more such incidents coming in from other cities in Maharashtra. This one is from Kolhapur. This one is from Amravati.

In the case of Ayaan from Amravati, he was handling AIMIM's social media handle. What's the truth? There is already fact-checking scenario going on in the background that has already given a clean chit to Ayaan saying that it's the result of a playboy lifestyle and there is no communal angle.

It seems the way rationalization and explanation is offered in the media, no one is a culprit anymore. It's true that we should not conduct trial by media, but when news media promotes both accusatory content as well as exculpatory explanations, it becomes difficult to be convinced.

How do we track these incidents? Documentation and officialization of such incidents will give force to the claims of there being planned conspiracy to demoralize Hindu society by targeting young Hindu girls. However, what happens is news comes out, everybody goes into emotional overdrive for some time, then news dies down, then from behind, cover up agents will come and rationalize the incident to be nothing to do with religion and then Hindus will come under doubt and they will forget.

We need some institution that is able to track all these incidents that happen on ground, maintain persistent visibility, track these cases and their movement through the legal process, in order to maintain visibility, and really understand the actual facts that took place. Ultimately, what's recorded in the judgment of the case only becomes the truth. Every thing else can be simply negated and dismissed as falsehood. People also would be quick to disbelief anything non-legal as false because that helps them escape any responsibility to develop a plan and take action on-ground.

https://www.opindia.com/2026/04/we-are-terrified-tarun-khatiks-family-plans-to-move-out-after-threats/

I cannot just accept it with my hands laying down about the utter travesty of injustice that has been meted out against Tarun Khatik.

First, he was not even present at the scene on that unfortunate day of Holi when an Islamist woman deliberately walked through a busy Hindu locality having high probability of receiving colour. Instead of staying indoors, or just ignoring receiving holi colours, she deliberately walked through the locality only to create the opportunity for inviting co-religionists to terrorize Hindus.

When Tarun Khatik arrived at the scene, he was lynched by an aggressive mob of 30-40 people. This happened in a predominantly Hindu majority locality.

When muslims see this. How openly they could single out a Hindu family in a majority Hindu locality, lynch a Hindu guy with everyone else watching, then wouldn't muslims feel right that they are in the correct religion? Their religious clerics would tell them, look, had you been in Hindu society, then if you had been lynched like that, other Hindus wouldn't come to save you. It's another thing that Hindus do not indulge in the business of wantonly killing people for their religious festivities. That's a distinctly Islamist disease.

Right after that, we see Islamists indulging in disinformation against Tarun Khatik alleging that he was a rapist and a molester, just to make the muslim side look better after mob lynching.

Now we get to know of Tarun Khatik's family receiving threats from Islamists (women, astonishingly) for taking the prosecution case away from the police. It's another matter that once FIR is registered, then the victims cannot withdraw the case. Will someone inform this to the muslims?

Nonetheless, there might be a possibility that the Delhi police may cold shoulder this case and not pursue it aggressively especially if Tarun Khatik sells their home and flees away.

It's unfortunate that a Hindu family does not have any support from its neighbours, that they feel exploited and vulnerable and put under distress and fear that they are considering fleeing. How many times are Hindus going to flee. How long will we continue to feel like this?

Hindus need to learn how to collectivize, organize, agitate and protest. Why are Tarun Khatik's family suffering silently? Why aren't Hindus of that locality taking out a protest on Delhi streets raising the issue of being threatened. Why didn't anyone of that family even use a mobile phone to record the video of the Islamists coming to their homes and threatening them?

How did muslims succeed with creating a protective umbrella of Islamophobia? Whenever non-muslims react to Islamist' propaganda, protests, content and speech, the reactions are not pre-planned, spontaneous, and therefore the cold objective environments of academia are used to classify such reactions as "rage filled".

In contrast, Islamist rage, such as attacking public property, burning police stations, hating on jews, abusing Hindu gods and deities, destroying temple vigrahas, is classified in terms of religious commands.

What's the difference between the two? The reactions of non-muslims are not in accordance with any commands that are written down in any particular scripture. In fact much of their scriptures are either very ancient or considered by their own followers as outdated. Most of the reactions of non-muslims therefore are because of a fear of takeover by Islamists. Islamists use such "spontaneity" of reaction to suggest and hint that the reactions of non-muslims can range from the ordinary to very severe and violent, purely motivated out of a fear. Hence Islamists have succeeded in establishing Islamophobia as a card to shut down any behaviour that happens to correct Islamist's aggressive tactics.

How do Hindus overcome this asymmetry? Before Hindus can overcome this asymmetry, they need to have a good sense of modern political science, and how law, and collective organization works.

You see Islamists are able to achieve whatever they can by clearly defining 'insider' and 'outsider' of the house of Islam. Thus, they are able to clearly define 'membership'. Being able to define this 'membership' is the first step before any other steps can take place.

Because Islamists have a clear idea of 'membership' of their body corporate, they are able to fashion out a single language to use as dog whistle to immediately canvas and align public opinion of the muslims in accordance with what their political and religious leaders interpret of any political situation.

Islamist religious leaders have a clear idea of how to read situations politically. They interpret evolving situations in accordance with whether a development is favourable to Islam or not. For e.g., just when there was a Modi wave in 2013 and it was becoming imminent that Congress would lose in 2014, muslim leaders interpreted the situation to be adverse to the interest of expanding Islam. So what did they do? They use the Congress government to pass the draconian Waqf law in 2013, using which muslims grabbed a lot of land illegally without any cross-checking, verification or scrutiny.

In this respect, Hindus currently are waking up but very slowly. They are aligned only politically, and not socially or culturally. Hindus follow different practices and rituals and even local festivals. This diversity is all fine, but because of this diversity, there is lack of a single political language for Hindus.

Most of the time when Hindus employ political language, they refer to glory of Hindu kings, rajputs and intelligent brahmans, which largely keeps the (so called) lower castes out of any role or involvement. I still can't come to terms with the reality that the muslims were so easily able to canvas (so called) lower castes over to their camp with the slogan of bheem-meem unity. It was developed on the basis of 'otherising' the savarna Hindus. How did muslims otherise Savarna hindus? By classifying (so called) lower caste as socio-economically backward just like muslims, they were able to achieve a common ground. What's the result of the same combine? Muslims gave (so called) lower caste a degree of political consciousness that has now started making demands for 'separate electorates', which rests on completely outrageous ideas that were discarded before the Constitution of India was framed.

When you talk to (so called) lower castes about fighting the fight against Waqf law, they will say that they are being asked to fight against muslims in support of their 'oppressors'. These are real political realities that Hindus are not paying enough attention to.

Muslims are smart. They are very well aware of their own version of history. Muslims had killed to take Pakistan. So this time, whatever they are planning, they do not want to be upfront about it. They are setting up ChandraShekhar Azad as the front to make divisive demands so that if anything goes wrong in the future, the muslims would make themselves come out as friends of (so called) lower castes against the common enemy of 'savarnas'.

In contrast, Hindus are not clear about membership of their own community. They are yet to form a political vision other than just defeating 'mlecchas'. Their has to be a constructive vision that addresses not only economic development but also that which brings dignity and socio-political equality to every Hindu. Secondly, Hindu religious leaders need to be able to not only speak the language of Dharma, but also of constitution and law. They have to gain fluency in the discourse of modern political science and ideologies.

Both UK and Spain are not toeing the US line. In fact it's a big thing for UK to deviate from a line that supports USA in its latest endeavour against Iran.

UK has been a great ally of the USA across all the maneuvers that USA had undertaken in the Middle East.

Although it's understood that UK citizens do not entirely support Israel. Even during the WWII, there was a section of English populace that were opposed to the idea of Israel. But the premiership was never in doubt with who to align with. Anglical self-interest.

But now, we see a change. Muslim population has increased in UK and Spain. They are able to act as a vote-bank everywhere, something they perfected in India. They are able to apply public pressure on public officials, institutions and democratic frameworks through the influence of their vote bank politics and bloc voting culture.

As a result, we now see UK and Spain taking a negative view of US-Israel-Iran war and not looking at it holistically as an issue of dealing with Iran, a state that promotes proxy terror activities in the Middle East just as how Pakistan promotes proxy terror against India.

This is a consequence of the years of muslim migration into European countries and their occupation of the public square debate and conversations where they have successfully established Islamophobia as a perfect sword to suppress all criticisms (including that of terror attacks carried out by Hamxs and Hxbxllah) while simultaneously claiming victimhood over the Palestinian question.

This was brought about by the power of politics, collectivization, organization, and carrying out protest marches, grabbing media space, producing online content to sway public opinion and generally platforming their perspectives, whether or not true, is immaterial. That's because their aim was never discovery of truth. It was just maintenance of pressure on others by repeating over and over their one sided versions with some facts and truths missing. They have indulged in collective gaslighting for all the public, and most of the public that are otherwise not political get easily swayed by them because of their frequent appearance and raising of their issues in the media. It's goebbelsian effect on display right in front of our eyes.