u/Top_Guess_946

Do you see what they are doing? They are making this inter-generational. They are preparing this for the future.

They are hoping for glory in the coming decades. They are being very patient. They are playing the long-game.

Long-game is what we never had. We believed in living today and in the present. That's what's peaceful.

But predatory cultures invested in the business of proving true and false cultures have built doctrines and dogmas to create programs with which they interpret present phenomena.

They have understood, right now they don't have enough numbers to badmouth the Hindutva project.

But they are hoping for tomorrow, just as the Britishers hoped when they noted few sporadic very rare incidents of Sati and then made a law banning it, which created the impression that Indians were barbaric, even though those were just being followed in some random locations and was not a nationally endorsed practice.

How to counter this real challenge of leftist zealots creating misleading narratives for the future?

Create your own documentary, written records, magazine articles, reels, videos.

Create back up copies.

What a powerful video of the police man showing great restraint.

Real strength is not the power to use force. It is the restraint to know when not to.

A uniform carries authority. Character is shown in how that authority is exercised under provocation.

Restraint is not weakness. It is discipline in action.

That's the difference between Due Process of the state and Tyranny of the Mob.

Western liberalism trying to find the objective reality in 'patriarchy' as the cause of all ills happening to women do not shy away from questioning the free and rampant availability of pornographic content.

Is it not something to wonder that crimes against women increased during the same period when internet became free to access.

I remember before Jio, reports of gang-rayp used to be rare and when they did occur, they used to drive public hysteria. Remember Nirbhaya? But now so many instances of such crimes have been reported without creating the same sense of public hysteria.

Has pornography normalized some depraved offences against women?

Western liberalists do not question pornography considering that as also part of free speech. Women from the same school of thought think that sex work is also noble work. Might be, but is creating filmed content for mass consumption also noble work? Something which is normal in private cannot be per se assumed to be normal in public. Simple thing. We might dirty talk to our partner, but can we do that in a bus with other female passengers? So for me sex work in media is something more than just work.

I would blame free availability of pornography as the reason behind men getting ideas to carry out depraved acts against women.

News

On Facebook, Bengali Muslims call Hindu women wh0res for wearing sarees, sankha pola. You see Bengali Muslim girls supporting these men to rape us, calling us wh0res in Bengali language.

They cry about Biharis all day but Bengali Muslims harassed us so badly, they never even talk about it. In 2013, a Bengali Hindu college girl was brutally gang-raped and murdered by Bengali Muslims in Barasat but those accused didn't even receive death penalty because Mamata wanted to stay on power with Bangladeshi Muslims vote. I just feel disgust, I feel utter disgust when I see Bengali Muslims. Because of Gandhi, we need to stay in a country with millions of these Bengali Muslim rapists. I must have committed sins in my last life to born in this state. I feel disgust.

• Person-to-person (P2P) transactions remain free.
• P2M transactions of up to Rs. 2,000 remain free. NPCI says these account for more than 95% of all P2M transactions by volume.
• Small merchants classified under the person-to-person-merchant (P2PM) category will continue to pay zero MDR, regardless of the value of an individual transaction. This category covers merchants receiving up to Rs. 1 lakh a month through UPI directly into their own accounts.
• The new MDR does not apply to UPI mandates. AutoPay and other recurring payments will continue to be governed by the existing pricing framework.
• Credit-linked UPI payments are also outside the circular. Payments made through RuPay credit cards or credit lines on UPI will continue to follow the rules for those products.
• Ten industry-program categories will pay a flat Rs. 5 on transactions above Rs. 2,000 instead of the standard 0.40%. These include fuel, agriculture, railways, bill payments, government payments, insurance, education, wallet top-ups, tolls and debt collection.
• Capital-market payments will attract a much lower MDR of 0.02% of the transaction value, capped at Rs. 300. This covers payments to mutual funds, securities firms, brokers and dealers.
• UPI apps cannot levy a platform fee or any other charge on UPI payments.

It's highly absurd that the leftists keep saying BJP is ignoring tribals, dalits, muslims, OBCs, trying to group up faultline identities into a single bloc, and perhaps a vote bank, for ultimately defeating BJP, while ignoring entirely how BJP rewarded Murmu, for doing a lot of developmental work for her tribal community.

The 'merit' they are referring to seems to be considered as merit only if someone can be modelled as per the ideas of urban dwelling citizens - used to anglicized mannerisms and westernized mindsets. For them working in the hinterlands, for the upliftment of one's tribal community members, working on the soil, with trees, with hut dwellers - does not count as merit?

These brown sepoy Indians are the worst. Even worser than Pakistanis who are confused about their identity. The latter at least acknowledge something is wrong. These brown sepoy Indians, on the other hand, unabashedly view their own identity as the 'Gold Standard' for every Indian and do not perhaps even realize how deracinated and distant they are from the Indian universe.

If there could ever be a bigger symbol of injustice in the history of mankind, it would be the injustices perpetrated by the Mohdn. population against Hindus of Indian sub-continent.

Hindus have been murdered, eliminated, genocided, raped, humiliated, killed, maimed, disabled, converted and what not in the regions of Pakistan and Bangladesh and such Hindus continue to suffer at the hands of muslim majoritarian governments of Pakistan and Bangladesh.

Yet Hindus have shown how we are actually capable of living harmoniously with respectful co-existence, that we work for development of all Indians, that we are not partisan, yet we are responded with disgusting and vile hatred only because Islamists are single-mindedly focused on the business of eliminating 'false' religion and promoting their 'true' religion.

Arey what use is the 'true' religion if it cannot even see the truthfulness of the history of Hindus and their benevolent rule, pursuit of Dharma, and working towards development for all. Hindus even lowered their religiosity for the sake of promoting secularism but the Indian muslims did not match Hindus in the same vein.

What use is the true religion if it blinds them from seeing the naked truth, shuts their mind from developing their own individual agency, cultivating their own mind to derive their own insights free from conditioning by collective insecurities and fears.

The distinction you draw between Darshana (philosophical inquiry / insight) and the Western Abrahamic construct of "religion" touches the root of modern comparative discourse.

Key Conceptual Themes

Darshana vs. Religion: Western categories of religion historically rely on a tripartite structure: a single historical prophet, a canonical text, and an exclusive institutional dogma. Applying this template to Sanatana Dharma compresses an "open-architecture" framework—one based on epistemological inquiry, multiple valid paths (Pramana), and contextual evolution (Yuga Dharma)—into a rigid creedal system.

Vivekananda & Shankaracharya: While Adi Shankaracharya provided the rigorous metaphysical foundation of Advaita Vedanta in the 8th century, Swami Vivekananda acted as a vital modern bridge. In the 19th-century context of colonial critique and internal reform movements (such as the Brahmo Samaj and Arya Samaj), Vivekananda re-articulated Vedantic universalism in a language that resisted Western intellectual hegemony.
The Political Economy of Monotheism: The argument that imperial Christianity (from Constantine's Edict of Milan in 313 AD through St. Augustine’s theological formulations) used organizational centralism to consolidate political control is well-documented in critical histories of late antiquity. Exclusive monotheism converted religious authority into a zero-sum political monopoly, contrasting sharply with decentralized, non-exclusive pagan and polytheistic traditions.

Cultural & Textual Destruction: Classical scholarship acknowledges the massive loss of Graeco-Roman literary and architectural heritage during the transition to Christianity, driven by imperial decrees targeting pagan temples and non-canonical manuscripts.

Critical Philosophical & Historical Nuances
To deepen this analysis, a few historical and philosophical distinctions are worth considering:

The Nature of European Categories: European orientalists and administrators categorized Asian traditions using the Protestant framework of "religions of the book" partly due to cognitive bias, but also to make diverse populations legible for colonial governance and legal codes (e.g., Anglo-Hindu Law).
Early Islamic Epistemology: 8th-century Arab accounts (such as those by Al-Biruni later on, or early Abbasid scholars translating Indian texts) often categorized Indian thought as Darshana or Hikmah (wisdom traditions) rather than simple paganism, recognizing its sophisticated logical and metaphysical frameworks.

Pluralism within Advaita: Advaita Vedanta itself operates on two levels of reality: Vyavaharika (empirical/transactional) and Paramarthika (absolute). This allowed Shankara to accommodate dynamic rituals and localized traditions (Upasana) without compromising the non-dual absolute (Brahman).

I just had a read of the wikipedia page on Bangsamoro. I don't trust wikipedia, but based on that preliminary (purva-paksha) view is the following. Informative on how the future history may be written by leftist distorians if such Muslim majority led movements acquire definite shape.

Moro are an ethnic race. (India does not have ethnic races as Indians are a melting pot)

Moro mostly became Muslims, and they resisted Spanish occupation of their territory (Indian Muslim majority regions do have some story of resistance to Britishers, but not like a sustained freedom from occupation like Moros). So they were used to autonomous rule.

Under US occupation, Christianization was done of Moro region. So they felt neglected. So they have been rebelling against Christian phillipines central government for a long time.

Muslims also do this. When Bangladesh formed, they Islamized Buddhist Chakma Autonomous Hill Tracts, which the Britishers never occupied. But because non-Muslims are not organized, they are not able to amplify reportage of Muslim atrocities on them, while the Muslims are able to do so because of pan-Islamist support and network.

 On a perhaps (un)related note:

“The Koran and the Mussulman legislation emanating from it reduce the geography and ethnography of the various peoples to the simple and convenient distinction of two nations and of two countries; those of the Faithful and of the Infidels. The Infidel is ‘harby’, that is, the enemy. Islamism proscribes the nation of the Infidels, constituting a state of permanent hostility between the Mussulman and the unbeliever."

- Karl Marx (1854)

Omar Abdullah says no muslim representative should disobey the law of the land. Secularism of Indian constitution demands that political representatives working at the State should observe the law and ensure compliance.

They can disagree at the level of personal faith or party ideology but not when they are functionaries of the State.

A very mature statement and which frames the concept of Constitutional secularism very precisely, which does not encroach upon one's personal beliefs or even community group level beliefs.