
Probably the least realistic thing I've ever seen in an FM game
scouting report says: shoot high

scouting report says: shoot high
I saw this somewhere and was surprised by how clearly I remembered it, and loved it as a kid.
Sources say it was on a building that was once a tenement/apartment, then hotel, then not much, at 1328 Grand. This puts it right around where the building housing "No Other Pub" and "KC Hooley House" is today. It was one of the casualties of the P&L development.
It was painted for 1988 NCAA Men's tournament famously won by Danny and the Miracles. I've seen it attributed to an artist named Ramiro Fauve, self-described as a "multidisciplinary artist, muralist, and singer-songwriter" born in Argentina and based in California.
The artwork is really good, especially compared to other big sports murals in the Midwest (google "Jonathan Toews mural" for reference).
I'm nearing my checkride for my Sport Pilot license; assuming I squeak through I'll be the first member of my club to have a SP rather than PPL, and the first post-MOSAIC SP any of the old heads around here know.
I'm curious what the future of SP looks like. My CFI thinks that SP is now designed to support people like me (just want to fly for fun and travel places in retirement) and PPL of the future will be pursued mainly by folks who want to fly professionally.
His quote specifically, more or less: "GA will eventually be filled with sport pilots flying experimental planes." Do you think that's accurate?
To that end; do you think that they'll move towards allowing IFR/night endorsements without a medical, assuming there isn't a big uptick in accidents/incidents from the MOSAIC changes? Will there be any loosening of the stall speed or passenger rules?
A clip of a very early Tiny Desk concert featuring a very strung out and very high Edward Sharpe is making the rounds across social media right now. It seems like every comment is ragging on at least one and usually multiple aspects of cir 2010 millenial culture.
I'm a lifelong history nerd focused largely on socio-cultural topics, and what we're seeing here is the inevitable backlash against a wildly popular, somewhat overexposed slice of life from that time period.
For me, personally, I loved that time and remember all of it fondly. I was a DINK living in a downtown apartment with lots of disposable income and very few real responsibilities. I loved Lumineers and Mumford and Sharpe (and their country/Americana equivalents like Sturgill Simpson and Jason Isbell). I loved the craft beer explosion. I loved the small restaurant explosion where a bunch of kids tried hard to offer something different than the Chilis/Applebees experience.
I also get why all this eventually wore thin. There were too many 10% ABV beers made with stupid additives and too many hops. Small restaurants operating on razor thin margins had to jack prices when everything got more expensive, and found no appetite, so to speak, for $20 craft cheeseburgers. Music always evolves, and what was hot ~10-15 years ago is usually the heart of what is considered stale and overdone. This was true with psychedelic rock, and disco, and funk, and grunge...millenial semi-indie folkie stuff is no different.
I'm in my mid 40s now, and I feel like I'm starting to see these big cultural shifts from a more distant perspective. 15 years from now, my kids will be the ones ripping on what was hot in 2026 (what even is? I honestly can't quite tell. Zyns?), and what was popular in 2010 will once again be beloved and firmly seated in the "nostalgic/classic" category.
Alex Ebert doesn't strike me as the type who will embark on nostalgia tours playing to rooms full of 60 year old fans, but I guess the Rolling Stones probably didn't seem like they would be either.
Wife and I had fantastic weekend burning through all of our various perks and credits, our first trip away from our kids, who we definitely love, in almost 4 years.
2 nonstops to DCA. Used SWA credit and my CSR-provided A-list credit. Enjoyed lounges at both ends.
2 nights at the Willard Hotel. Edit and IHG credit covered most of room cost, point boosted points covered the rest. Wife booked with her CSR-provided "diamond elite" (lol at these names) credit to get suite upgrade, free drinks at the fancy bar, and extra points. Wife used $100 property credit to pay for most of a wonderful massage. Edit perk covered room service breakfast each morning.
$150 Open Table credit got us...about half a fancy dinner.
Lyfted most of the time in DC, wife has some sort of status there and got point boosts.
I get why there's a lot of complaints about The Edit and the portal and all that. Frankly, I was a little shocked our hotel price was comparable to what was offered through IHG. It took some serious shopping to find one that wasn't dramatically overpriced. There ARE competitive options out there, you just have to search for them a bit, or get lucky.
SWA was great, easy to book through the portal and was otherwise seamless for us.
While we were gone, our annual fee hit. $990 sucked, but I'd gotten a $300 retention offer a few weeks ago so it wasn't as bad as it could've been. I guess I'm on the hook for at least another year.
Anyway, was a wonderful weekend, mostly paid for by the credit card. Kids survived largely intact.