Living in the Material World — My 1 Slight Tweak to a Masterpiece

Living in the Material World — My 1 Slight Tweak to a Masterpiece

I’ve been listening to the album Living in the Material World a lot the past few days.

I think the album is a masterpiece. It’s a very different album from its predecessor. I think of ATMP as an A+ collection of songs on an abundant double album. But Living in the Material World achieves its masterpiece status differently.

It’s a very tight, cohesive, thematically unified album. To me, this album is almost like the George Harrison equivalent of either Ram or Plastic Ono Band — the tightest distillation of its creator’s aesthetic and thematic interests. In this formulation, ATMP is more like Imagine or Band on the Run — the more varied album that’s just full of wall to wall bangers.

Anyway, I think Living in the Material World is George’s second straight masterpiece to start his solo career, but there’s one slight thing that bothers me. I think the sequence could be slightly improved.

Side One is perfect:

  1. Give Me Love (Give Me Peace on Earth)
  2. Sue Me, Sue You Blues
  3. The Light That Has Lighted the World
  4. Don’t Let Me Wait Too Long
  5. Who Can See It
  6. Living in the Material World

Perfect. No notes. I think this is one of the best album sides of George’s career and I wouldn’t change a thing.

Side Two, though, has a fairly notable energy sag down the final stretch. But every song is wonderful. And I think it would be fixed with a simple swap:

  1. Be Here Now
  2. The Lord Loves the One
  3. Try Some Buy Some
  4. The Day the World Gets ‘Round
  5. That Is All

I feel like Be Here Now would have been the perfect song to start Side Two. It’s a very Within You Without You way to start Side Two: a cosmic, meditative, beautiful, transcendent song. Very still, after the energy and variety of Side One.

Then The Lord Loves the One, which is a good midtempo rocker, actually feels even more explosive coming after such a still track.

Then the rest of the album plays out as originally sequenced as a comedown and resolution.

In the current version, the only energetic track comes first, then a transcendent but extremely slow track. Then a bunch more slower paced tracks, and it gives the feeling of slogging a bit to the finish line.

Anyway, who am I to tell George how to improve his album? I think it’s a masterpiece either way, but I think this one little tweak would have made it PERFECT.

Hare Krishna!

u/donlockwood2026 — 5 days ago
▲ 31 r/PRINCE

The Black Album?

Hey y’all! Prince is one of my favorite artists of all time, but I’ll admit I haven’t done the full deep dive into the body of his work yet.

I’m slowly making my way through the stuff I haven’t heard before — a lot of the 90s stuff in particular.

I’ve run into one intriguing album that I can’t seem to figure out: The Black Album.

Was this released as an actual album, or was it something kept in the vault? Is it on streaming anywhere? Is this one of those releases that you can kind of reconstruct out of tracks that made their way to other albums/outtakes included on expanded special editions of some of the albums?

Any info about this would be helpful. I’m very curious to track it down and listen!

reddit.com
u/donlockwood2026 — 11 days ago
▲ 61 r/beatlesfanalbums+1 crossposts

[1986] Paul McCartney — Press to Play (Alternate Version)

The Background:

I haven’t done this before, but I’ve been spending time getting to know Paul’s 1980’s work. Press to Play is a fascinating album, but… frustrating.

Looking back at the Daily Song Discussion song scores, I found I agreed with the consensus: the last three songs just don’t cut it, but the 3 bonus tracks are very good. I also struggle mightily with Talk More Talk.

Another issue: the track list feels so off to me!

How do you not press play on an album called Press to Play and the first thing you hear isn’t Press playing? The wordplay writes itself!

Track List:

So here’s what I landed on:

Side 1

  1. Press — 4:43
  2. Pretty Little Head — 5:14
  3. Write Away — 3:00
  4. It’s Not True — 5:53
  5. Tough on a Tightrope — 4:42
    Side 1 Runtime: 23:32

Side 2
6. Stranglehold — 3:36
7. Good Times Coming / Feel the Sun — 4:44
8. Hanglide (*b-side) — 5:18
9. Footprints — 4:32
10. Only Love Remains — 4:13
Side 2 Runtime: 22:23

Total Runtime: 45:55

Why This Works Better for Me:

Opening track — You have to start with Press. It’s the single. It’s catchy. It’s the title. It establishes we are making an adult 1980s pop album. It helps start to establish the identity… which Track 2 completes.

Second Track: Pretty Little Head is weird. Good weird. I didn’t understand what this album was until I got to this track (7th) on the original. It’s Paul the eccentric studio experimenter figuring out mid-80s production while balancing his pop craftsmanship and his eccentricity. This is the shadow identity of this album, and it needs to come up front.

Third Track: Write Away is fun! We dabble in the experimental side on PLH, and now we get back to some pop fun here on track 3.

Fourth: It’s Not True is a good album glue track. Keeps things moving.

Side Closer: Tough on a Tightrope is one of the best songs here. Doesn’t have the finality to end the album, but it makes you want to turn the record over and keep listening.

Side Two Opener: Stranglehold was way too indistinct to start the album and be a thesis statement. Here it’s much better used as an energetic kick off to side 2. A lower-stakes position for a solid song.

Next Track: Good Times/Feel the Sun is a nice one here. We’re deep into the album and we get Paul doing classic Paul things: a suite. Still recognizably pop with some of those eccentric touches. Speaking of which…

Middle of Side Two: I don’t care for Talk More Talk, but I recognize what it does for the album: add a weird, experimental texture. I think it’s not very good and it comes awkwardly too early in the album. Moving Pretty Little Head up to the second overall slot now establishes the experimental side of Studio Paul in a great way, so here, deep into the album, we can go full instrumental/atmospheric/spacey/textural as a continuation of that theme established on the second track of Side One. And I love the b-side Hanglide for this. If you disagree, you can keep Talk More Talk.

Penultimate Track: Footprints is one of the best songs on the album. A great song to lead into the finale.

Closer: Only Love Remains… you gotta end on the ballad! This is the only song from the entire pool of available songs that has finality to it. I like the version from the Singles Box Set with the cheesy sax solo. Why not lean into 1986 adult contemporary pop? That’s a major part of what we’re doing here! But as I hope I’ve leaned into, it’s just one side of the Paul coin that this album explores, as there’s some more interesting stuff happening as well.

The Cover:

The original album cover is atrocious. It makes me not want to listen to the album. Old fashioned cover means old people boring music. And given the original side one… I kinda don’t disagree.

The new cover sets the tone: it’s a Paul photo from 1986. Simple, elegant text. The cover communicates clearly what the album is: Paul in his early 40s using the studio as a tool to see if he can crack the riddle of mid-80s pop production while allowing himself to explore and get a little weird. A synthesis of the studio sophistication of Tug of War/Pipes of Peace and the exploratory studio as instrument eccentricity of McCartney II.

Warm, inviting, it makes me want to Press play.

u/donlockwood2026 — 12 days ago

Do I have terrible taste or are Street-Legal and the Complete Budokan shockingly good?

Not necessarily mutually exclusive, but…

I’m digging into Street-Legal and the Complete Budokan live album for the first time in my Dylan fandom. Been a fan since the early 2000s as a teenager. Saw him live about 6 times since 2001, so maybe I expect Bob to rearrange his songs all the time and don’t feel married to “they have to sound like the album.”

Anyway, I was reading that these albums were not well-received and seen as corny or somehow desecrating the original versions of these songs. But all I’m hearing is some great music with a big band and lots of energy.

And Street-Legal is so good! Great band arrangements, incredible lyrics, fantastic songs. I truly do not get what the problem was for people back when these came out.

Is the fanbase still divided these records? Are these albums actually corny and terrible and I just have bad taste? It’s okay either way, I’m happy to keep these ones to myself if people don’t like ‘em!

reddit.com
u/donlockwood2026 — 18 days ago

Live at the Aragon Ballroom -- 2000

Hey! Figured I'd come here for some help. I'm revisiting The Smashing Pumpkins after many years away. I was such a MASSIVE fan as a kid. Obsessed. I played my sister's copies of their albums to death. And in 2000, when I was 13, Machina was the new album and I had to get it and play it a million times.

My sister and her boyfriend took me to their show at the Aragon Ballroom that year. This was before that first breakup, which if memory serves, we didn't know yet that they would be breaking up later that year. So this was my first time of what I hoped would be many times seeing them. Turns out it ended up being the only time (though I'm hoping to go to their show this year on the new tour when they pass through my current town).

Anyway, this is getting rambling. I remember my sister's boyfriend gave me a copy of the show I went to on CD back then. We moved many times after that, and my CD got lost in the move. I'm wondering if any fans know how to track down those recordings? I remember they played an interesting set list, including a Talking Heads cover of Once in a Lifetime and they closed the show with a song I'd never heard that was like "Join together with the band... join together with the band..."

If anyone has any info on how to track something like this down, I'd be much obliged!

reddit.com
u/donlockwood2026 — 2 months ago
▲ 104 r/TheCure

New Cure fan?

So, I’m nearly 40 and never gave The Cure a listen before this past week. As a kid in the late 90s and early 2000s I loved Smashing Pumpkins (being from Chicago, they were my band). Loved Radiohead, and indie music like Animal Collective, Arcade Fire, etc. Classic rock too like Dylan, Beatles, Beach Boys.

Anyway, for whatever reason I never gave The Cure a listen. Still don’t know much about them. But I randomly wanted to revisit the Pumpkins all these many years later, so have been listening to them and tracing what music influenced them, which led me to the Cure.

Well, holy shit. I started a couple days ago with Three Imaginary Boys and the Boys Don’t Cry single. Instantly fell in love. Moved on to Seventeen Seconds, which I liked just as much. And just last night I listened to Faith, which I loved even more than the previous two.

There’s no particular reason for this post, just needed to tell someone how blown away I’ve been by The Cure, so figured I’d tell people who are fans. I still don’t know anything about the band in terms of lore or how fans rate their albums and songs relative to each other (ie what are the fan favorites). Any thoughts or feedback is welcome, but either way I’m looking forward to further exploring the discography. Thanks!

reddit.com
u/donlockwood2026 — 2 months ago

George’s Best Work: Beatles or Solo

I’ve been listening to a George playlist I made all day. It includes my favorite Beatles tracks and my favorites of his solo work. It made me wonder do fans generally think more highly of his solo work or his Beatles songs?

I know by volume he has more solo work. But his songs with the Beatles are very strong, so I could see it going either way.

I love John and Paul as solo artists, but I think most people would say that their strongest work came with the Beatles. That’s no shade on their solo work whatsoever — anybody’s career best would be the Lennon/McCartney Beatles songs. George is an interesting case, though, because it can really go either way.

Seems to me his extended peak as a songwriter and performer was 68-73. Most of my favorites come from this era. And if we want to narrow to an absolute apex, he was on fire in 69-70 with his last Beatles songs and All Things Must Pass album. It’s just interesting because both his peak peak and his extended peak overlap with his Beatles and solo era.

Is there a consensus? Or is it like a 50-50 among the fanbase? What do you say?

reddit.com
u/donlockwood2026 — 3 months ago