We're so beyond compared to Sydney it's not even funny. It's just depressing. If the SRL gets cancelled we're even more behind. Someone explain why they've been able to build so fast.
By the year 2035. Assuming that the SRL, Melton electrification & Upfield extension to Wallan, the Airport Link and the Sydney Metro all go ahead we'll see
Sydney:
- 112km of metro
- 335km of suburban train network.
- 447km total transit network.
- 25% of their total network will be a metro.
- 2 Airports, 2 Airport lines.
- 2 proper CBDs (Parramatta - This one is more of a geographical advantage that Sydney has, really can't compete here).
Melbourne:
- 26km of an automated metro line.
- 1 Airport line.
- 0 proper secondary CBDs. (Just look at the station precinct impression plans, and tell me if you think they can rival Parramatta, they can't.)
- Total suburban network of 492 km (+62km in extensions and Airport Link)
- Total train network of 518km. (+26km from with SRL)
- 5% of our total network would be a metro.
Someone explain to me, how Sydney can build 112km of metro in 22 years (2013-2035), or about 5.0km every year and we'll be stuck building the SRL North and East (~35km + 26km) which is 61 km in 28 years or about 2.1km every year. They're building twice as fast as we are and they're building it cheaper. I find it difficult to believe that this is purely because of geological difference in the stones that both our cities sit on.
People here like to claim that it's because Sydney is just sandstone while Melbourne is more difficult to dig through. Sure, but TBMs can dig the tunnels anywhere between a few months to a year, right? That doesn't explain why it takes so long to actually install the rails and the wirings within the tunnels themselves. I swear saying it's geology and just geology is just copout answer at this point.
A part of me think's its in part of the CFMEU corruption which is certainly true to an extent but I don't think it can account for Sydney building more than twice as fast.