I run vpn, i have tivimate downloaded, im running zyminex but it only allows for live tv. When i try to select a movie, this is the error i get. When i try to select premium it doesnt give me an option.
Galaxy Digital (GLXY) is still primarily valued by the market as a crypto financial services company, with earnings tied to trading activity, Bitcoin cycles, and broader digital asset volatility. That framework is increasingly outdated because it does not reflect the scale or structure of the AI infrastructure business being built through Helios, a hyperscale data center campus in West Texas designed for large scale artificial intelligence compute workloads.
Helios is positioned around one of the most constrained inputs in the AI economy, which is power availability at industrial scale. The campus is being developed in phases and is designed to scale into the multi-gigawatt range over time, supported by secured grid capacity in ERCOT. This is not a traditional data center buildout aimed at speculative colocation demand. It is purpose-built infrastructure aligned with long-duration AI compute requirements where power, land, and speed-to-deployment are the bottlenecks.
A major catalyst that materially de-risks the early phases of this buildout is the structured agreement with CoreWeave, an AI cloud infrastructure provider scaling aggressively alongside demand for GPU compute. CoreWeave As part of this partnership, CoreWeave has committed approximately $1.4 billion in project financing tied directly to the Helios buildout, helping fund infrastructure expansion while also anchoring long-term compute demand. This structure is important because it effectively aligns capital deployment with contracted usage rather than speculative capacity expansion.
Based on disclosed expectations around this agreement, Helios is projected to generate roughly $1 billion in annual revenue for Galaxy once the relevant phases are fully operational and utilization ramps. This figure reflects infrastructure-level economics rather than pure operating profit, meaning it is tied to capacity deployment, power usage, and long-term contracted compute demand rather than volatile trading activity. In practical terms, this shifts a meaningful portion of Galaxy’s future earnings base into recurring, infrastructure-linked cash flow rather than market-sensitive revenue streams.
The importance of this structure is that Helios transitions from being a development stage asset into a partially de-risked, contract-backed AI infrastructure platform. Instead of building capacity first and searching for demand later, Galaxy is scaling infrastructure alongside anchored demand and financing support. The $1.4 billion in project financing from CoreWeave functions not only as capital support but also as a signal of committed utilization for early build phases, reducing uncertainty around ramp timing and adoption.
As Helios expands beyond initial phases, the revenue profile of Galaxy begins to materially shift. The company moves from being primarily dependent on crypto market conditions toward a hybrid structure where a growing portion of EBITDA is driven by contracted AI infrastructure cash flows. This creates a dual engine model where crypto operations remain cyclical upside exposure, while Helios becomes a more stable, long-duration revenue base tied to physical compute demand.
The market inefficiency today is that GLXY is still being valued predominantly through a crypto financial services lens rather than an infrastructure or AI compute framework. If Helios executes according to its current buildout plan, and if the projected $1 billion annual revenue contribution materializes at scale, the business profile evolves into something structurally different. At that point, Galaxy is no longer just a crypto-native financial company with an AI initiative. It becomes a power-constrained AI infrastructure operator with an embedded crypto business layered on top.
In traditional market re-rating cycles, businesses that transition from volatile financial earnings models into contracted infrastructure cash flow models typically see valuation frameworks expand significantly due to improved visibility, duration, and scarcity of underlying assets. Helios represents that type of transition mechanism within Galaxy, with CoreWeave acting as the anchor tenant and financing partner that helps initiate the shift from speculative development to contracted AI infrastructure scale.
My position is 1154 shares at 31.88.
This is not financial advice.
Galaxy Digital (GLXY) is still primarily valued by the market as a crypto financial services company, with earnings tied to trading activity, Bitcoin cycles, and broader digital asset volatility. That framework is increasingly outdated because it does not reflect the scale or structure of the AI infrastructure business being built through Helios, a hyperscale data center campus in West Texas designed for large scale artificial intelligence compute workloads.
Helios is positioned around one of the most constrained inputs in the AI economy, which is power availability at industrial scale. The campus is being developed in phases and is designed to scale into the multi-gigawatt range over time, supported by secured grid capacity in ERCOT. This is not a traditional data center buildout aimed at speculative colocation demand. It is purpose-built infrastructure aligned with long-duration AI compute requirements where power, land, and speed to deployment are the bottlenecks.
A major catalyst that materially de-risks the early phases of this buildout is the structured agreement with CoreWeave, an AI cloud infrastructure provider scaling aggressively alongside demand for GPU compute. CoreWeave As part of this partnership, CoreWeave has committed approximately $1.4 billion in project financing tied directly to the Helios buildout, helping fund infrastructure expansion while also anchoring long term compute demand. This structure is important because it effectively aligns capital deployment with contracted usage rather than speculative capacity expansion.
Based on disclosed expectations around this agreement, Helios is projected to generate roughly $1 billion in annual revenue for Galaxy once the relevant phases are fully operational and utilization ramps. This figure reflects infrastructure level economics rather than pure operating profit, meaning it is tied to capacity deployment, power usage, and long-term contracted compute demand rather than volatile trading activity. In practical terms, this shifts a meaningful portion of Galaxy’s future earnings base into recurring, infrastructure linked cash flow rather than market-sensitive revenue streams.
The importance of this structure is that Helios transitions from being a development-stage asset into a partially de-risked, contract backed AI infrastructure platform. Instead of building capacity first and searching for demand later, Galaxy is scaling infrastructure alongside anchored demand and financing support. The $1.4 billion in project financing from CoreWeave functions not only as capital support but also as a signal of committed utilization for early build phases, reducing uncertainty around ramp timing and adoption.
As Helios expands beyond initial phases, the revenue profile of Galaxy begins to materially shift. The company moves from being primarily dependent on crypto market conditions toward a hybrid structure where a growing portion of EBITDA is driven by contracted AI infrastructure cash flows. This creates a dual engine model where crypto operations remain cyclical upside exposure, while Helios becomes a more stable, long duration revenue base tied to physical compute demand.
The market inefficiency today is that GLXY is still being valued predominantly through a crypto financial services lens rather than an infrastructure or AI compute framework. If Helios executes according to its current buildout plan, and if the projected $1 billion annual revenue contribution materializes at scale, the business profile evolves into something structurally different. At that point, Galaxy is no longer just a crypto-native financial company with an AI initiative. It becomes a power constrained AI infrastructure operator with an embedded crypto business layered on top.
In traditional market re-rating cycles, businesses that transition from volatile financial earnings models into contracted infrastructure cash flow models typically see valuation frameworks expand significantly due to improved visibility, duration, and scarcity of underlying assets. Helios represents that type of transition mechanism within Galaxy, with CoreWeave acting as the anchor tenant and financing partner that helps initiate the shift from speculative development to contracted AI infrastructure scale.
My position is 1154 shares at 31.88.
This is not financial advice.
Edit:
TLDR: Galaxy Digital is still being valued like a crypto trading company, but Helios is shifting it into an AI infrastructure business. The CoreWeave deal includes about $1.4B in project financing and anchors early demand, with expectations of around $1B in annual revenue once buildout phases are online. This turns Helios into a contracted AI compute campus rather than a speculative data center, meaning a large portion of GLXY’s future earnings could come from stable infrastructure cash flows instead of crypto cycles, which is why the market may eventually re-rate the stock significantly if execution continues.
I’ve been looking deeper into LifeVantage after the recent earnings report, and despite the selloff, the overall setup here is still one of the more interesting short interest situations in the market right now.
Current short interest is sitting around 3.75 million shares with only about a 10 to 13 million share float. That puts short interest at roughly 37.5 percent of the float, which is extremely elevated for a stock this size. Days to cover is currently around 34.8 days based on average volume.
The borrow fee has also remained very high recently, ranging from roughly 30% up to over 100% according to recent Fintel and trader tracking data.
What makes this setup interesting is that the stock trades relatively low daily volume compared to the size of the short position. In simple terms, if momentum suddenly appears, there are not many easy exits for shorts.
Now let’s talk about the earnings they just reported.
LifeVantage reported Q3 fiscal 2026 revenue of $43.7 million with EPS of $0.11. Revenue was down year over year, which explains why the stock initially sold off after earnings.
But there were also several things in the report that bulls are paying attention to.
The company still has no debt, cash increased to $12.5 million, management raised the quarterly dividend by 11 percent, and there is still roughly $59 million remaining under the company’s share repurchase authorization.
That buyback authorization is important because the company’s entire market cap is only around the $60 million range right now. Some traders are looking at that and thinking the company could aggressively reduce the float if management chose to continue repurchasing shares.
This is where the squeeze thesis comes from.
The setup is not really about the company suddenly becoming a hyper growth business overnight. It is about positioning. Shorts are heavily crowded into a low float stock with elevated borrow costs and high days to cover. If sentiment improves even slightly, or if buyers start piling in because the stock appears oversold after earnings, shorts may have difficulty exiting quickly.
That does not guarantee a squeeze, but structurally the conditions are there.
A lot of people on Reddit are still watching this closely because and believe the combination of high short interest, expensive borrow fees, buybacks, and low liquidity could create a sharp move if volume suddenly returns.
That is really the entire setup here. The structure is extremely tight, but if buyers start piling in the pressure could actually force a major move.
This is not financial advice.
Edit:
TLDR: LFVN has a very crowded short setup with 37% of a small float (10–13M shares) sold short, high borrow fees, and 35 days to cover, which makes it structurally capable of sharp moves if volume spikes.
Recent earnings came in with lower revenue year over year, which caused weakness, but the company still has cash, no debt, and a remaining buyback authorization that some traders see as a potential support factor.
The core idea is that this is not an active squeeze right now, but a tightly positioned stock where any positive catalyst or surge in buying interest could force fast short covering. Without that catalyst, it can just drift or stay weak.
GLXY has strong fundamentals and a huge deal with coreweave so decided to go hard on it before my phone died.
I’ve been digging into LifeVantage and the setup here is actually interesting heading into upcoming earnings, especially from a positioning standpoint rather than just fundamentals.
Right now, short interest is sitting around 3.7 million shares. The float is roughly 10 to 13 million shares, which puts short interest at about 37 percent of the float. That is already very high.
On top of that, days to cover is currently estimated around 35 to 45 days depending on volume. The borrow rate has also been elevated recently, sitting at 63%, which shows that shares are not easy or cheap to borrow right now.
Put simply, a large portion of the tradable shares are being sold short, and the stock does not trade a lot of daily volume. That combination matters because it means if price starts moving quickly, there is not a lot of liquidity for shorts to exit without pushing the price higher.
Now the key part here is earnings.
If the company delivers a positive surprise or even stronger than expected forward guidance, that can act as a trigger. In a setup like this, a shift in sentiment can cause shorts to rethink their positioning quickly. When that happens in a stock with low liquidity and high short interest, price moves can accelerate because shorts may start covering at the same time new buyers step in.
The borrow cost being high also adds pressure in the background. When it becomes expensive to maintain short positions, any upward move can make it less attractive for shorts to stay in the trade, especially if momentum starts building.
So the real situation here is not that a squeeze is guaranteed, but that the structure is in place for a sharp move if sentiment shifts.
If nothing triggers it, nothing happens. If something does, the move can happen quickly because of how the positioning is built up.
This is not financial advice.
I’ve been digging into LifeVantage and the setup here is actually interesting heading into upcoming earnings, especially from a positioning standpoint rather than just fundamentals.
Right now, short interest is sitting around 3.7 million shares. The float is roughly 10 to 13 million shares, which puts short interest at about 37 percent of the float. That is already very high.
On top of that, days to cover is currently estimated around 35 to 45 days depending on volume. The borrow rate has also been elevated recently, sitting at 63%, which shows that shares are not easy or cheap to borrow right now.
Put simply, a large portion of the tradable shares are being sold short, and the stock does not trade a lot of daily volume. That combination matters because it means if price starts moving quickly, there is not a lot of liquidity for shorts to exit without pushing the price higher.
Now the key part here is earnings.
If the company delivers a positive surprise or even stronger than expected forward guidance, that can act as a trigger. In a setup like this, a shift in sentiment can cause shorts to rethink their positioning quickly. When that happens in a stock with low liquidity and high short interest, price moves can accelerate because shorts may start covering at the same time new buyers step in.
The borrow cost being high also adds pressure in the background. When it becomes expensive to maintain short positions, any upward move can make it less attractive for shorts to stay in the trade, especially if momentum starts building.
So the real situation here is not that a squeeze is guaranteed, but that the structure is in place for a sharp move if sentiment shifts.
If nothing triggers it, nothing happens. If something does, the move can happen quickly because of how the positioning is built up.
This is not financial advice.
I’ve been digging into LifeVantage and the setup here is actually interesting heading into upcoming earnings, especially from a positioning standpoint rather than just fundamentals.
Right now, short interest is sitting around 3.7 million shares. The float is roughly 10 to 13 million shares, which puts short interest at about 37 percent of the float. That is already very high.
On top of that, days to cover is currently estimated around 35 to 45 days depending on volume. The borrow rate has also been elevated recently, sitting at 63%, which shows that shares are not easy or cheap to borrow right now.
Put simply, a large portion of the tradable shares are being sold short, and the stock does not trade a lot of daily volume. That combination matters because it means if price starts moving quickly, there is not a lot of liquidity for shorts to exit without pushing the price higher.
Now the key part here is earnings.
If the company delivers a positive surprise or even stronger than expected forward guidance, that can act as a trigger. In a setup like this, a shift in sentiment can cause shorts to rethink their positioning quickly. When that happens in a stock with low liquidity and high short interest, price moves can accelerate because shorts may start covering at the same time new buyers step in.
The borrow cost being high also adds pressure in the background. When it becomes expensive to maintain short positions, any upward move can make it less attractive for shorts to stay in the trade, especially if momentum starts building.
So the real situation here is not that a squeeze is guaranteed, but that the structure is in place for a sharp move if sentiment shifts.
If nothing triggers it, nothing happens. If something does, the move can happen quickly because of how the positioning is built up.
This is not financial advice.
I’ve been digging into LifeVantage and the setup here is actually interesting heading into upcoming earnings, especially from a positioning standpoint rather than just fundamentals.
Right now, short interest is sitting around 3.7 million shares. The float is roughly 10 to 13 million shares, which puts short interest at about 37 percent of the float. That is already very high.
On top of that, days to cover is currently estimated around 35 to 45 days depending on volume. The borrow rate has also been elevated recently, sitting at 63%, which shows that shares are not easy or cheap to borrow right now.
Put simply, a large portion of the tradable shares are being sold short, and the stock does not trade a lot of daily volume. That combination matters because it means if price starts moving quickly, there is not a lot of liquidity for shorts to exit without pushing the price higher.
Now the key part here is earnings.
If the company delivers a positive surprise or even stronger than expected forward guidance, that can act as a trigger. In a setup like this, a shift in sentiment can cause shorts to rethink their positioning quickly. When that happens in a stock with low liquidity and high short interest, price moves can accelerate because shorts may start covering at the same time new buyers step in.
The borrow cost being high also adds pressure in the background. When it becomes expensive to maintain short positions, any upward move can make it less attractive for shorts to stay in the trade, especially if momentum starts building.
So the real situation here is not that a squeeze is guaranteed, but that the structure is in place for a sharp move if sentiment shifts.
If nothing triggers it, nothing happens. If something does, the move can happen quickly because of how the positioning is built up.
This is not financial advice.
If we hold $10 come 3:30pm too many shorts will have to cover and this thing could see a big double digit end of day.
Update: $30 million in volume so far!
So SoundHound (SOUN) is basically trying to fix the fact that every Wendy’s drive-thru speaker sounds like it’s underwater and held together by duct tape.
They’re doing voice AI for real businesses restaurants, cars, call centers not just “ask Siri the weather” type stuff. And unlike a lot of AI names, they actually have revenue, around \\\~$170M annual run rate and still growing fast.
Now here’s where it gets spicy: short interest is sitting around 40%. That’s not “a few skeptics,” that’s a full-on “we think this thing is garbage” crowd all piled in.
Earnings are expected next week and sentiment is leaning toward a beat. If they even slightly outperform, this turns into one of those situations where the chart turns into a vertical line for no reason other than positioning getting blown up.
The company also announced on April 21, the $43 million acquisition of LivePerson. Management is implying the combined business could scale toward roughly $350M to $400M in revenue by 2027, with a longer-term path toward around $500M if execution goes well. LivePerson itself is expected to contribute over $100M in revenue contribution during the transition period.
But let’s be real… this is still a cash-burning AI company competing with Google and Amazon in the background. So it’s either:
Wendy’s speaker finally gets upgraded and this thing rips +50–100% on a squeeze + AI hype
Or we all end up back behind the Wendy’s dumpster wondering why we thought “voice AI” was free money.
This is not financial advice.
I hold 23 call contracts expire May 8th $8 & $8.5
So SoundHound (SOUN) is basically trying to fix the fact that every Wendy’s drive-thru speaker sounds like it’s underwater and held together by duct tape.
They’re doing voice AI for real businesses restaurants, cars, call centers not just “ask Siri the weather” type stuff. And unlike a lot of AI names, they actually have revenue, around \\\~$170M annual run rate and still growing fast.
Now here’s where it gets spicy: short interest is sitting around 40%. That’s not “a few skeptics,” that’s a full-on “we think this thing is garbage” crowd all piled in.
Earnings are expected next week and sentiment is leaning toward a beat. If they even slightly outperform, this turns into one of those situations where the chart turns into a vertical line for no reason other than positioning getting blown up.
The company also announced on April 21, the $43 million acquisition of LivePerson. Management is implying the combined business could scale toward roughly $350M to $400M in revenue by 2027, with a longer-term path toward around $500M if execution goes well. LivePerson itself is expected to contribute over $100M in revenue contribution during the transition period.
But let’s be real… this is still a cash-burning AI company competing with Google and Amazon in the background. So it’s either:
Wendy’s speaker finally gets upgraded and this thing rips +50–100% on a squeeze + AI hype
Or we all end up back behind the Wendy’s dumpster wondering why we thought “voice AI” was free money.
This is not financial advice.
I hold 23 call contracts expire May 8th $8 & $8.5
So SoundHound (SOUN) is basically trying to fix the fact that every Wendy’s drive-thru speaker sounds like it’s underwater and held together by duct tape.
They’re doing voice AI for real businesses restaurants, cars, call centers not just “ask Siri the weather” type stuff. And unlike a lot of AI names, they actually have revenue, around \\\~$170M annual run rate and still growing fast.
Now here’s where it gets spicy: short interest is sitting around 40%. That’s not “a few skeptics,” that’s a full-on “we think this thing is garbage” crowd all piled in.
Earnings are expected next week and sentiment is leaning toward a beat. If they even slightly outperform, this turns into one of those situations where the chart turns into a vertical line for no reason other than positioning getting blown up.
The company also announced on April 21, the $43 million acquisition of LivePerson. Management is implying the combined business could scale toward roughly $350M to $400M in revenue by 2027, with a longer-term path toward around $500M if execution goes well. LivePerson itself is expected to contribute over $100M in revenue contribution during the transition period.
But let’s be real… this is still a cash-burning AI company competing with Google and Amazon in the background. So it’s either:
Wendy’s speaker finally gets upgraded and this thing rips +50–100% on a squeeze + AI hype
Or we all end up back behind the Wendy’s dumpster wondering why we thought “voice AI” was free money.
This is not financial advice.
I hold 23 call contracts expire May 8th $8 & $8.5
So SoundHound (SOUN) is basically trying to fix the fact that every Wendy’s drive-thru speaker sounds like it’s underwater and held together by duct tape.
They’re doing voice AI for real businesses restaurants, cars, call centers not just “ask Siri the weather” type stuff. And unlike a lot of AI names, they actually have revenue, around \~$170M annual run rate and still growing fast.
Now here’s where it gets spicy: short interest is sitting around 40%. That’s not “a few skeptics,” that’s a full-on “we think this thing is garbage” crowd all piled in.
Earnings are expected next week and sentiment is leaning toward a beat. If they even slightly outperform, this turns into one of those situations where the chart turns into a vertical line for no reason other than positioning getting blown up.
The company also announced on April 21, the $43 million acquisition of LivePerson. Management is implying the combined business could scale toward roughly $350M to $400M in revenue by 2027, with a longer-term path toward around $500M if execution goes well. LivePerson itself is expected to contribute over $100M in revenue contribution during the transition period.
But let’s be real… this is still a cash-burning AI company competing with Google and Amazon in the background. So it’s either:
Wendy’s speaker finally gets upgraded and this thing rips +50–100% on a squeeze + AI hype
Or we all end up back behind the Wendy’s dumpster wondering why we thought “voice AI” was free money.
This is not financial advice.
I hold 23 call contracts expire May 8th $8 & $8.5
So SoundHound (SOUN) is basically trying to fix the fact that every Wendy’s drive-thru speaker sounds like it’s underwater and held together by duct tape.
They’re doing voice AI for real businesses restaurants, cars, call centers not just “ask Siri the weather” type stuff. And unlike a lot of AI names, they actually have revenue, around ~$170M annual run rate and still growing fast. Short interest is sitting around 40%. That’s not “a few skeptics,” that’s a full-on “we think this thing is garbage” crowd all piled in.
Earnings are expected next week and sentiment is leaning toward a beat. If they even slightly outperform, this turns into one of those situations where the chart turns into a vertical line for no reason other than positioning getting blown up.
The company also announced on April 21, the $43 million acquisition of LivePerson. Management is implying the combined business could scale toward roughly $350M to $400M in revenue by 2027, with a longer-term path toward around $500M if execution goes well. LivePerson itself is expected to contribute over $100M in revenue contribution during the transition period.
But let’s be real… this is still a cash-burning AI company competing with Google and Amazon in the background. So it’s either:
Wendy’s speaker finally gets upgraded and this thing rips.
Or we all end up back behind the Wendy’s dumpster wondering why we thought “voice AI” was free money.
This is not financial advice.
I hold 23 call contracts expire May 8th $8 & $8.5 because I’m poor.
Tldr; big potential after earnings in May 7 or Wendy’s dumpster
I just watched Bohemian Rhapsody and watching freddie mercury and queen on their come up, reignited a motivational drive in me that I felt I’ve lost the last few years. Watching freddie lose what time he had left and just not waste a single minute of it made me realize just because I’m younger now, it could all be taken away from us at any point in time, what impact do you want to leave behind for others, just leaving the world a little bit better than when you got here has always been my goal and that movie made me realize i cant let that goal slip.