
Pili to rejoin Sparks as a DP
Source: https://bsky.app/profile/flybyknite.bsky.social/post/3mpweazwlac26
Update: Russo confirms on Threads that Laura Ziegler was released.

Source: https://bsky.app/profile/flybyknite.bsky.social/post/3mpweazwlac26
Update: Russo confirms on Threads that Laura Ziegler was released.
On the positive side, it turns out the league CAN schedule four games on the same day without overlapping. Also, I really thought the Starzz were back for a minute. (Source here.)
Los Angeles took her at No. 20 overall (second round) in the 2026 draft after she led Division I in scoring at Florida State, averaging 25.4 points per game as a junior.
She spent her final college season at South Carolina, where her scoring dropped to 14.1 per game but her efficiency was the best of her career. As a rookie she’s averaging 1.8 points, 1.0 rebound, and 0.3 assists in 5.0 minutes a night.
In the clip she talks about staying ready despite the limited role and learning to play point guard after spending most of her college career at shooting guard. Per a recent ClutchPoints interview, she says she stays ready whether the night brings 20 minutes, four minutes, or none.
h/t: johnwdavis
Chiney Ogwumike posted some of her thoughts about the LA Sparks on Threads. Here's most of it:
>This is a “read and react” system that was crafted primarily around KP and she is my literal fav aka a BUCKET, praying for my girl’s speedy recovery! But with this roster, the Sparks vision should have been adapted to maximize what you have and mask what you don’t. Every team has a “motion” or “safety net” offense that plays to their strengths… instead it seems the players are forcing a system that isn’t molding to them. This is especially highlighted when KP is out.
>Which is why it is important to have an offensive safety net which most call a “motion offense.” Ball swings side to side, players are in their favorite spots and it’s a comfort zone when all hell breaks loose in a game! For example, something that easily creates strategic isolations for KP, short rolls for Nneka, drives for Dearica, off the dribble midrange jumpers for Ariel, finds Rae downhill in transition etc… But right now this process is buffering. 😭
>Now defensively, I remember “back when I played” 🤣💀 if my team was struggling with defense, our coach would want to simplify coverages. For example, “let’s ice all screens or hedge all screens.” But at this level, if you do that… you are BBQ chicken. Players are too smart! I was in Crypto to see my dawg Slim drop 37, the “rookie and the vet” Olivia drop 30 and my fav girl ‘Rina go for 53 on the Sparks… the W is a league of adjustments & “KYP” aka know your PERSONNEL, not simply team coverages.
>Just as much as I am proud of my big sis in Year 15 still doing her thing 🤯❤️ … I also want to see the young players develop and thrive! Cam was really on a roll and I love getting to know players like Taniya as we cover them through their transition to the league.
What do you think? Is it intellectually satisfying to try to pin down the details (even at this high a level) of what's going wrong for the team, or is it like staring at a black hole? Can a read and react system actually work at the pro level? Assuming your players aren't idiots, how can the defense be improved without simplifying? Can you learn more about basketball by watching a parade of negative examples? We all have so many questions.
I always enjoy learning about the overseas play experience for W players (as well as how players from outside the U.S. experience the W). I thought it would be fun to try to compile a list of firsthand accounts of playing in leagues outside the W. This can be a massive list and can include media in other languages -- feel free to share anything you've got.
I think Alanna Smith kept a vlog of her time in China somewhere, right? There are also interviews and media where players tell anecdotes about their time overseas within a larger narrative: the Diana Taurasi documentary talking about Shabtai Kalmanovich; Maya Moore's Love and Justice; various interviews with Candace Parker where she talks about her time in Russia; Stewie and Marta telling the story of how they met. What else?
I've been meaning to write up a long, careful, well-researched post about the results of past mid-season coaching changes in the WNBA, but time constraints are what they are, so I think I'll just do the lazy crowdsourced version instead. We've had a few recent examples: head coaches fired from Los Angeles in 2022 and Phoenix in 2023; a head coach who left Chicago voluntarily in 2023. Briefly summarized:
What other midseason changes do you all remember from earlier seasons? What were your thoughts about these, if you lived through them as fans? If you happen to want to see your team's current head coach fired... what do you think is the best case scenario for the remainder of the season?
(FWIW, I do think Jeff Pagliocca has to go ASAP. Trading the 2028 FRP to Washington for Jacy Sheldon was the last straw for me, and has convinced me that he believes taking picks away will motivate the team to win. Skye would be a better GM.)
Peyton keeps an online journal and wrote up a two-part account of her time in the WNBA earlier this season. Part 1 covers her stint with the Fire:
https://journalingjock.wordpress.com/2026/06/10/my-weekend-as-a-wnba-player/
>The thrill of the brand-spanking-newness of it all—new team, new system, new franchise—continued throughout training camp. This was largely due to the team’s north star, the Constraints Led Approach (or CLA). The staff operated under the bible of CLA, which preached the value of skill instruction through varied, dynamic drills over structured, rote repetition. Conceptually, the method seeks to challenge the athlete through adaptability, better equipping them to handle the variability of a game and its wide-ranging demands on the mind and body.
>However, the staff also paid homage at the shrine of data-analytics. They crunched numbers, ran the percentages, solved for X. In the pursuit of efficiency, they eliminated the post-up and mid-range game, pushing for finishes at the rim and shots around the three-point line. They drilled cutting patterns, elegant solutions arrived at through formulas and the movement of players like chess pieces. Improvisation was encouraged… but there were right and wrong answers.
>Adaptability and efficiency. These two ideals reigned in the Portland Fire training camp. The combination, and often juxtaposition, of the two led to a frenetic environment that was both fun and chaotic. Some players thrived under the approach, while others sometimes left practice feeling like they were sacrificing their unique identity to the holy-grail-promises of empirical data.
>I was one of the latter. Though I am also a believer in learning through failure and adaptability, I had made a career out of an “inefficient” skill: the mid-range jumper. Very quickly, I realized I would have to prove myself at camp without the use of the very skill that had gotten me there. It’s like asking a chef to prepare her signature dish with her dominant hand tied behind her back: doable, for sure, but the process would be messier and slower. But, don’t forget, the chef also is working against the clock. And the chef hasn’t cooked in two months.
In Part 2, she moves on to Phoenix:
https://journalingjock.wordpress.com/2026/06/21/pt-2-my-weekend-as-a-wnba-player/
>If the Fire had the energy of a tech start-up, the Mercury had the reverence of a church. The two programs were polar opposite. While Portland bustled with the tumultuous energy of a new franchise, Phoenix operated with the assuredness of a team that had existed since the beginning of the W thirty years ago. The Mercury moved with the confidence and purpose of a more veteran squad (the average age of the starting five was 32), and a team that had gone to the finals last year.
>I was greeted by a whole new cast of characters, and I repeated my name enough times that it ceased to sound like a real word anymore. Next I knew, I was in practice, with a different team in a different state. I did my best to bring energy, to make my presence felt, even if my head was reeling from the new terminology and tactics. The style of practice felt more familiar to me than it had in Portland, lending itself to more structured, repetitious drills. But, gone was the almost democratic style of play where everyone mixed in with everyone else. In Phoenix, there was a pecking order. There was a group of the starters and then there was the rest of us. Occasionally, the two groups would mix, but rarely.
>After day one, I felt it went pretty well. I thought I’d held my own within my practice group, and perhaps even made a few new friends. However, that night, four players got cut. Followed by two more players the next day. As season drew nearer, the business side of basketball was rearing its ugly head. No one was safe.
Graphic from Tankathon. I lost my draft of this post last night, so you lucky people get the shorter rewritten version in bullet points:
Thoughts? Right now, it looks pretty likely that #1 goes to either Houston or Washington.
Source here. Games cited are Lynx vs. Aces (Lynx won 88-73) and Lynx vs. Sparks (Lynx won 87-76).
What do you think: if you put together a roster of the 12 oldest players in the league this year, and another roster of the 12 youngest, who would be on each roster and who would win? Best of 5?
One of the more noteworthy comments from last night's postgame media here. Her instructions to herself to do better: “look at lineups, hold more accountability, less freedom. I also think, let’s not lose sight of the fact that KP really is the head of the snake in terms of the system, and we don’t have her … therefore, we really need to execute. Therefore, we really need to be in the right spots. Therefore, we really gotta set those screens right. It’s not ‘therefore, oh, bummer.’”
Nneka, asked a follow-up as a “team leader,” remarked: “It’s not often that you have a coach that will take that amount of responsibility on a game that, obviously, we were out there playing. So I just want to play harder. I want to be able to bring to life this system that she has for us, that we’ve seen work this season. I took more accountability for my lack of aggression the last few games. I think sometimes, in an effort to execute a system, I try my best to not overdo what I’m doing. But I think a part of this is that I need to be able to be aggressive in the right spots, be in the right situations, get my teammates open, be involved in the actions, without trying to force it. And coach is right: we have to have an understanding of our roles on the offensive end, and tonight we definitely did not show that. The fight was there, but we have to give that fight some type of framework. And you know, she’s a pro’s coach, and we have to be pros in that way to respond so that we can get the result we want.”
(I have to say here: Nneka was caught on video a few weeks ago leading the team in a “1-2-3 CEREBRAL” cheer. It’s her great strength and her great weakness.)
What do you all think is really missing here? Is "less freedom + different lineups" going to do it? Detail on x's and o's welcome -- I know we can insult and berate these people to no end, but I'm also cerebral-on-3 and I'm curious.
No games today, so I thought I would share this article about Portland's star from the Shelby County Reporter, published just before March Madness 2025. It discusses her early years playing with her twin brother on a boys' team, her major knee surgery as a young teen, her bonds with coaches at Georgia and Alabama, and her religious faith. (Her high school is in a large suburb of Birmingham, Alabama, which I point out for anyone as ignorant as I am about the geography of the American South. Hopefully that's not many of you.)
By ANDREW SIMONSON | Sports Editor
Standing underneath the basket at Coleman Coliseum on Sunday, Feb. 23, Sarah Ashlee Barker locked arms with her parents Jay and Amy staring down the end of a journey.
It was a journey that took her from basketball courts around the Hoover area and Spain Park High School to Athens, Georgia and Tuscaloosa, Alabama. One that went from the exhilarating highs of state championship buzzer-beaters and the NCAA Tournament to the crushing lows of deep physical and emotional pain.
Through it all though, Barker has remained the same, working for everything she has while trusting in someone greater than herself to guide her along the way.
"I just know that whatever God has for my life, that's how my story is going to be written and I'm not writing it. God is," Barker said. "The only thing that I can control is how hard I work and how much effort I put into the game, but I can't control you know the wins and the losses. Because it's not my story to write, it's His, and it's already been written."
One of the boys
Barker's love for the game started at a young age, but she almost turned the game away. When her mother asked her twin brother Harrison and her if they wanted to sign up for 6-year-old YMCA basketball, she declined.
It only took watching one practice to change her mind.
"We went to his first practice, he started running around, he was dribbling the basketball, and I looked at my mom and I was like, 'Wait, I actually want to play,'" Barker said.
Not only did she want to play the same sport as Harrison, she wanted to play with him. From then until sixth grade, the Barker twins played together as Sarah Ashlee honed her skills by playing against boys, not girls. She quickly became one of the best players and caught the eye of everyone watching.
One of those people told then-Spain Park head girls basketball coach Mike Chase about her talent. He almost missed her though simply because he looked in the wrong place.
"They were telling me about this Barker kid and so I was going to all these rec games trying to find her and I couldn't find her and finally got in touch with somebody and they were like, 'Well, coach, you're not finding her because she doesn't play with girls,' and I was like, 'OK, well, where does she play?' 'Well, she's got a twin brother and she plays in the boys rec league,'" Chase recalled. "So then I went to a boys practice and there's all these boys practicing in the gym and then there's just one girl over there playing, and sure enough, that was her, so that was my first introduction to her."
I'm taking the data from HHS, as always. It's slightly out of date for two teams (New York and Indiana now have 12 active players) as I type this. We seem to have four tiers, plus one pseudo-tier:
The Valkyries can exempt Iliana Rupert's $450K contract from the cap, but without it they still fall between tier 2 (multiple mins) and tier 4 (less than 1 min). It looks like Indiana had only $245,923 in cap space after waiving Shatori Walker Kimbrough, so I'm guessing that they're close to the cap now after signing Grace VanSlooten. Vegas is doing Vegas things. Minnesota's situation makes it clearer why they've been leaning on their DPs so much early in the season, as they wait for the injured front court to return.
Any thoughts or corrections? Teams are listed in alphabetical order within tiers, not by cap space, which I realize is strangely obnoxious.
Update: I swear I checked before posting, but the Lynx have just waived Hamzová, which would free up the funds for another rookie minimum signing; they also have the additional (+ prorated 7,500) for a vet minimum.
I decided to look this up, because I didn't have it straight in my head. If I have any of these facts wrong, please let me know and I'll edit the post. We'll start with the 2022 draft, after the Sparks finished 2021 in 10th place.
[Edit: I literally did not remember ever seeing Soares in a game in 2024, but sorry about that! Thank you for the correction!]
The 2022 and 2023 drafts were weak, and other teams didn't really benefit at L.A.'s expense. (Atlanta might be the biggest winner with Naz Hillmon, who wasn't a lottery pick.) Dallas got zero playing minutes 22 games over 2 years from the 2023 pick, and Emily Engstler has been an impactful role player but not starting caliber so far. However, the Sparks also got relatively little out of these trades.
Right now, their 2024-26 asset management looks rough, but it's hard to say whether the lottery trades in particular are the biggest factor in the team's struggles. It's not high praise to observe that Kelsey Plum has been the most significant return on any 2020s lottery trade so far (although Ariel Atkins has barely played yet and Rickea was a great contributor before leaving).
If you want to speculate about alternate histories here, have fun! I get way too bogged down in trying to figure out how many things change with each counterfactual transaction...
I have questions, and maybe you have answers. First, has KP ever talked about her vision of playing point, whom she might model her game after, anything like that? Do you think she has a coherent idea of what she wants to do?
Furthermore: what's the blueprint for point guard play within Roberts' system? Did Roberts have any players in college who executed it particularly well? Do you think she sees it as a key role, or is her program semi-positionless and focused on shooting?
Thanks in advance for any insights. I'm pretty lost.
For anyone else who keeps refreshing ten different sites, including this one. No team has signed more than one development player so far, but this is likely to change in the next 24 hours. As of right now, this seems to be the picture. Later additions in bold.
Atlanta Dream: ?, ?
Chicago Sky: ?, ?
Connecticut Sun: Ashlon Jackson, ?
Dallas Wings: Dulcy Fankam Mendjiadeu, Costanza Verona
Golden State Valkyries: Miela Sowah, ?
Indiana Fever: Justine Pissott, ?
Las Vegas Aces: ?, ?
Los Angeles Sparks: Laura Ziegler, ?
Minnesota Lynx: Emese Hof, ?
New York Liberty: Marine Fauthoux, ?
Phoenix Mercury: Marta Suárez, ?
Portland Fire: Frieda Bühner, ?
Seattle Storm: Taina Mair, ?
Toronto Tempo: Mariella Fasoula, ?
Washington Mystics: Darianna Littlepage-Buggs, ?
I think Marta Suárez and the Chicago waivees are probably fielding offers, and there are probably other logjam situations. Let's chatter as it all plays out.
Keep it relatively cute, but... there must be at least a few questions left off the official survey.
What else?
You can treat this as a "get as close as possible to reality" exercise, you can make fanciful trades, you can make it shady, whatever. If your team already needs some hardship players, you can pick those as well. If you really feel your team needs to sign Natasha Cloud... you are the GM.
I'll do GSV, Storm, and maybe Sparks, but I have to think about it. Golden State in particular is very tricky.