I made a reframing exercise that doesn't analyse your thought, it just asks you to label it yourself. Is that enough?

I made a small app for practising cognitive reframing and I'd like a genuine read on whether the core idea works. No link, not selling anything, I built it. It's four screens:

  1. You type the thought that's actually bothering you, in your own words. Say you type "I snapped at my kid tonight, I'm a bad parent and I'm ruining their childhood."
  2. It shows that sentence back to you with five buttons under it: Worst-Case Thinking, Guessing Their Thoughts, Always/Never Thinking, Feelings as Facts, One Bad Time = Always. You tap the ones you think are in there. As many as you want, none is also fine.
  3. It shows your thought again with the traps you picked listed beside it, and a box to write a more balanced version. A few sentence starters sit above the box if you're stuck, things like "I don't actually know that..."
  4. Your two sentences side by side, before and after. That's the end.

The part I'm unsure about: it never tells you what's in your thought. You decide. It doesn't read the sentence or diagnose it. It hands you five labels and gets out of the way. I did that so it couldn't guess at your thought and get it wrong, but I can't tell if that's respectful or just lazy.

If you've done CBT or anything like it: does naming it yourself do the work, or does it only land when something else names it for you?

reddit.com
u/mr-jain-yogesh — 21 hours ago

In cognitive restructuring, how much depends on the label being accurate?

Context, briefly and honestly: I've been building a free self-help exercise. No link, and I'm not asking anyone to try it. I have a question about the mechanism that I can't answer from reading alone.

The exercise asks someone to write down a distressing thought, then tap which of five distortions they think are in it, from a fixed list in plain language (worst-case thinking, mind reading, all-or-nothing, feelings as facts, overgeneralising). Nothing checks or corrects the choice. Then they write a more balanced version of the thought and see the two side by side.

What I don't know is how much of the benefit in cognitive restructuring comes from the label being right.

  • In session, if a client misidentifies the distortion but still generates a balanced alternative, do you correct the label, or is the alternative the part that matters?
  • Is unguided self-labelling doing anything useful, or does it mostly work because a therapist is there asking the follow-up questions?
  • Is there a risk in it? I'm thinking of someone who labels everything as one distortion, or who turns the list into another way to be wrong about themselves.

Any pointers to the literature on the active ingredient here would help too.

reddit.com
u/mr-jain-yogesh — 1 day ago

I made a reframing exercise that doesn't analyse your thought, it just asks you to label it yourself. Is that enough?

I made a small app for practising cognitive reframing and I'd like a genuine read on whether the core idea works. No link, not selling anything, I built it. It's four screens:

  1. You type the thought that's actually bothering you, in your own words. Say you type "I snapped at my kid tonight, I'm a bad parent and I'm ruining their childhood."
  2. It shows that sentence back to you with five buttons under it: Worst-Case Thinking, Guessing Their Thoughts, Always/Never Thinking, Feelings as Facts, One Bad Time = Always. You tap the ones you think are in there. As many as you want, none is also fine.
  3. It shows your thought again with the traps you picked listed beside it, and a box to write a more balanced version. A few sentence starters sit above the box if you're stuck, things like "I don't actually know that..."
  4. Your two sentences side by side, before and after. That's the end.

The part I'm unsure about: it never tells you what's in your thought. You decide. It doesn't read the sentence or diagnose it. It hands you five labels and gets out of the way. I did that so it couldn't guess at your thought and get it wrong, but I can't tell if that's respectful or just lazy.

If you've done CBT or anything like it: does naming it yourself do the work, or does it only land when something else names it for you?

reddit.com
u/mr-jain-yogesh — 1 day ago

I made a reframing exercise that doesn't analyse your thought, it just asks you to label it yourself. Is that enough?

I made a small thing for practising cognitive reframing and I'd like a genuine read on whether the core idea works. Screenshots below, no link, not selling anything. I built it. You type the thought that's actually bothering you, in your own words. It shows it back to you and asks which thinking traps you see in it. The traps are named plainly:

Worst-Case Thinking
Guessing Their Thoughts
Always/Never Thinking
Feelings as Facts
One Bad Time = Always

You tap any that feel true, as many as you want. Then you write a more balanced version, with a few sentence starters if you're stuck, and it shows you the before and after.

The thing I'm unsure about: it never tells you what's in your thought. You decide.

It doesn't read the sentence or diagnose it. It hands you five labels and gets out of the way. I did that on purpose, because I didn't want something guessing at your thought and getting it wrong. But I can't tell if that's respectful or just lazy, and whether doing the naming yourself teaches you anything or whether you need to be shown.

If you've done CBT or anything like it: does labelling it yourself do the work, or does it only land when something else names it for you?

u/mr-jain-yogesh — 1 day ago

I screwed up my LaunchLama launch. What would you do with 3 days left?

I launched Ponoki on LaunchLama and realized a little too late that I made a pretty basic mistake.

I prepared the product. I prepared the launch page. I did NOT prepare an audience 😅

Now I have 3 days left and I'm trying to make the most of them.

For anyone who's done launches like this before, what would you focus on right now? And more importantly, what should I have done in the weeks before launching?

Not dropping a link because I genuinely don't want this to be a sneaky promo post. Just trying to learn how to do this better next time (or in 3 day - not much expectations of that though)

reddit.com
u/mr-jain-yogesh — 1 day ago
▲ 27 r/Google_Ads+1 crossposts

Feeling on Thursday

The client wants more volume.

Finance wants lower CPA.

Google wants broader match types (and AI-MAX ugh!)

And I am just trying to make it to Friday.

reddit.com
u/mr-jain-yogesh — 14 days ago