1987 constitution/Cory constitution sets us back.
Throughout history, there's no such thing as limited terms.
Nations prosper by 1 vision = 1 leader.
250 years ago, United States was born. They have become so powerful that scholars think it's an anomaly.
Why 6 year term never work for a developing nation.
- This system was imposed by the United States to all nations to keep them from prospering making sure no rivals will arise against the United States unless the nation is willing to become a US vassal state.
That's why the US is really against authoritarianism.
1a. Election allows foreign powers to install puppet leaders for their own interest eg. Zelensky, Pahlavi
- Authoritarianism boost economic development rapidly because there are no obstructing projects, political differences/ideologies in implementing projects.
eg. China, Singapore, UAE, Dubai.
Authoritarian or highly centralized systems can have an advantage when they combine political continuity with competent institutions.
1 vision = 1 leader.
There's no endless debates whether we need HSR or what policies are more important.
What must be done gets done.
Wala na yung, "kailangan ba natin yan?", "sayang pera jan", "pano na ang kalikasan?"
- When you have political parties in constant disagreements, slow paced development becomes inevitable.
After the leader finishes his term, the new leader who is likely from the opposition party will discontinue the previous admin's legacy to erase any traces of accomplishments.
This creates an endless cycle of build and destruction after election.
eg. Philippines
- Huge infrastructure projects take 10~30 years to mature. With our current system of 6-year terms, it becomes susceptible to being redesigned, renamed, delayed, cancelled, investigated, or replaced.
eg. Subway, Mindanao Railway
- Because there's no 1 vision, it becomes unpredictable for foreign investors.
It becomes difficult to invest if tax policy, industrial policy, energy policy, foreign investment rules, trade policy
can change any time.
eg. PNOY cancelled Belgian project
- Short term leadership such as 6-year term barely produce anything significant.
They will only work for 4 years. The next 2 years will be a preparation for the next election.
eg. Impeaching political rivals, stealing government funds for election campaigns.
Makes me wonder bakit yung senador 12 years then congressman 9 years. Dapat yung presidente rin 10+ years to make a difference
What happens if the leader is incompetent?
We kick him out. That's it. Just a vote of no confidence.
No need to wait for another 6 years or election to install a competitive leader.
Pero ganito din naman ang America?
In the US it's 4 years with 2 terms. Pero look what America has become?
Sobrang gulo ng pulitika nila. Wala para rin sila HSR until now pinagdedebatihan.
Note:
The goal is not for permanent leadership. The goal should be the permanent national direction.
And no, I don't want BBM to continue.