Am I overthinking?
Yaar I’ve been listening to sufi spell “Maikada” by Samie Muhammad heavily these past couple days. But a few days ago I had a pretty long dream.
Quick context: a person came to me in the dream and said “Don’t listen to Maikada, it’s shirk… and the Messenger of Allah ﷺ has sent me to tell you this.
Now I already know, if the Prophet ﷺ doesn’t appear himself and some third party is relaying the message, it’s not binding. Shetan can’t take the Prophet’s ﷺ actual form, but he can send a messenger in a dream. So technically the dream alone isn’t daleel.
But then I actually looked at the lyrics…
“Maula-e-Kainaat (A.S) aur awaz de mujhe Ay Jibrail (A.S) quwwat-e-parvaaz de mujhe”
This is a direct appeal to Jibrail A.S. asking him to grant something. Du’a is ibadah we all know this. So how is this not shirk in du’a?
I get that Samie Muhammad uses metaphors, but when the structure of the line itself is a sincere appeal… that’s not really a metaphor anymore is it?
I haven’t listened to it since that day. Mind is genuinely unsettled.
Is my concern valid or am I overthinking? Would love to hear from people with actual Islamic knowledge, not just “bro it’s just poetry relax.”