I've always found that lectures on game theory seem to kinda exist in the vacuum of individual relationships, which makes sense in theory, but in practice, there's always extenuating circumstances that disrupt the theory in practice. Therefore, it makes a lot more sense to talk about game theory at the geopolitical level first and then drill downwards in order to isolate [or integrate] one's study of individual game theory from outside forces of the world
Jiang does an excellent job doing precisely this
https://www.youtube.com/@PredictiveHistory/videos
The first eight videos of the "secret history" series up to "death by bureaucracy" are great
There's a lot of religious stuff beyond that, so not sure how good it is, because I got kinda bored and stopped watching lol, but the first videos in that series are chefs kiss
In the video "Secret History #14: Legacy of the Steppes" Jiang says that civilizations that are based on city states ultimately lead to corruption and death by bureaucracy, and then he mentioned that the indus river valley was the only exception and he would talk about that later in the video, but he never returns to the topic.
I'm actually quite curious if there is a way to avoid bureaucracy, because that would be cool to know about as I decide where to live for my life.
Idk where I heard it, I think on youtube, but I'm running into a similar problem with Dr. Mannuele's staff and them being pretty darn inflexible on sharing details about what the initial recorded consultation includes. Can anyone please help me understand whether the two questions in the title are included in the recorded consultation.
Concretely:
If he mentions if FME would fit in your palette, or if it is too narrow and requires some other type of marpe? (or generally which kind of marpe he recommends)
If he mentions the amount of expansion he estimates he'd be able to achieve with your case?
Maybe it's just me, but I don't appreciate being left in the dark on paying money for a consult and not knowing what I'll actually get, and then knowingly being upsold on a follow up consultation where I'll actually be able to talk about the tiny number of questions that I'm actually interested in discussing (in the title). I've heard mannuele's great, so not sure why he thought it would be a good business strategy. Frost's practice (another prominent ortho in the US west coast) literally just does free videos for patients and take's questions you're interested in. I suggested the possibility of just having these two questions answered in the recording and I could just pay the same amount as the live q&a, and I'm currently getting ignored, so idk whether that's negotiation tactics or something, but not a great first impression nonetheless. Also, for context, I've already consulted with other orthos on this, plus watched his videos online, so other questions have already been answered.
I'd greatly appreciate some wisdom if anyone worked with his practice previously. Thanks all
I don't want to end up in the news as someone who died from having too much glue chemicals or something like that 😨
but I would like to use props that are attached to my skin frequently for streaming. Is there a particular theatrical glue that is designed for this purpose? I will be using magnetic forces as well, so I'd like to find a glue that has a strong hold
Idk where I heard it, I think on youtube, but I'm running into a similar problem with Dr. Mannuele's staff and them being pretty darn inflexible on sharing details about what the initial recorded consultation includes. Can anyone please help me understand whether the two questions in the title are included in the recorded consultation.
Concretely:
If he mentions if FME would fit in your palette, or if it is too narrow and requires some other type of marpe? (or generally which kind of marpe he recommends)
If he mentions the amount of expansion he estimates he'd be able to achieve with your case?
Maybe it's just me, but I don't appreciate being left in the dark on paying money for a consult and not knowing what I'll actually get, and then knowingly being upsold on a follow up consultation where I'll actually be able to talk about the tiny number of questions that I'm actually interested in discussing (in the title). I've heard mannuele's great, so not sure why he thought it would be a good business strategy. Frost's practice (another prominent ortho in the US west coast) literally just does free videos for patients and take's questions you're interested in. I suggested the possibility of just having these two questions answered in the recording and I could just pay the same amount as the live q&a, and I'm currently getting ignored, so idk whether that's negotiation tactics or something, but not a great first impression nonetheless. Also, for context, I've already consulted with other orthos on this, plus watched his videos online, so other questions have already been answered.
I'd greatly appreciate some wisdom if anyone worked with his practice previously. Thanks all
My tongue suction is already good when I am sleeping at night. It's the one thing that's preventing nightmares/headaches, and I'd prefer not to use PAP, so I just make sure my tongue is good and my mouth tape is on.
However, I worry that with the change in my palette, I may lose that and end up out of the pot and into the fire so to speak. In other words, my nose may open up, but then I'll lose tongue suction and just have standard apnea
This is what I fear, I don't actually know if this is what happens for such a small expansion.
Did anyone else with a small, narrow tongue like mine have this happen during expansion?
I fear that expansion might cause my tongue to no longer have good suction to the roof of my mouth if I expand, because I have a very narrow and small tongue, and the roof of my mouth is shaped pretty form fittingly to the shape of my tongue (as expected). Will I be at risk of losing this good suction by doing expansion?