Login

u/Beyondtheseafree

r/Panarab r/MapPorn r/amazing_architecture r/Algeria_213 r/dontlookthatup r/GermanMuslime r/AllAuthorsWelcome r/Colonialism r/MuslimAcademics r/AncientCoins r/Somalia r/redditrequest r/masjid r/HolyShitHistory r/2westerneurope4u r/China_irl r/tucker_carlson r/Libya r/Hasan_Piker r/IndianMuslimHistory r/FPandA r/Ancient_Pak r/indonesia r/Bagabondo r/ottomans r/ArchitecturalRevival r/fitnessportugal r/architecture r/HistoryUncovered r/IslamicArchitecture r/International r/HistoryPorn r/islamichistory r/HistoryGaze
▲ 1.3k r/IslamicArchitecture+3 crossposts

The palace that was built in the name of love, Royal Alcázar of Seville.

​

There's a reason the Royal Alcázar of Seville feels different from most palaces. When you walk through its gardens, courtyards, and intricately carved arches, it doesn't just feel like a royal residence. It feels like a place that has quietly witnessed centuries of love, ambition, loss, and survival.

What many people don't know is that the Alcázar wasn't originally a Christian palace. Its story begins in 712 CE, shortly after the Muslims arrived in the Iberian Peninsula, when the first Umayyad rulers of Al-Andalus built a fortified citadel on this site. Over the following centuries, especially during the 11th century, Seville became the capital of the Abbasid dynasty, and the old fortress was transformed into a magnificent complex of palaces that reflected the artistic brilliance of Islamic Spain.

Among the rulers who walked these halls was Al-Mu'tamid ibn Abbad, the last great king of Seville. Ironically, what history remembers most about him isn't one of his battles. It's his love story. Al-Mu'tamid fell in love with Itimad al-Rumaykiyya, a woman who wasn't born into royalty, nor chosen for political alliances. According to medieval chroniclers, she was originally a servant. He freed her, married her, and made her his queen simply because he loved her. One legend says that Itimad once confessed she missed the sight of snow from her childhood. Seville rarely sees snow, so Al-Mu'tamid planted rows of almond trees throughout the palace gardens. Every spring, when the white blossoms covered the ground, it looked as though snow had fallen just for her.

In 1091, the Almoravids took over Seville. Al-Mu'tamid lost his kingdom, his palace, and everything he had spent a lifetime building. He and Itimad were exiled across the Strait of Gibraltar to Aghmat, where they lived the rest of their lives far from the city that had once been theirs.

Yet perhaps the most remarkable part of their story is that exile never separated them. After losing power, wealth, and a kingdom, they still had each other. Al-Mu'tamid remained devoted to Itimad until his death in 1095, and today they rest side by side, a reminder that while kingdoms rise and fall, some stories outlive the empires that created them.

The Royal Alcázar itself continued to evolve after the Christian conquest of Seville in 1248. Christian kings expanded it, preserved much of its Islamic architecture, and built new sections in the distinctive Mudéjar style, where Islamic craftsmanship continued to shape Spain.

I think that's what makes the Alcázar so fascinating. It's a place where civilizations overlapped instead of replacing one another completely. Muslim emirs, Christian monarchs, poets, architects, craftsmen, and lovers all left their fingerprints on the same walls.

Sources:

Hugh Kennedy, Muslim Spain and Portugal: A Political History of al-Andalus (Routledge, 1996).

Antonio Vallejo Triano, The Arts of al-Andalus.

UNESCO World Heritage Centre – Royal Alcázar of Seville.

Ibn Bassam, Al-Dhakhira fi Mahasin Ahl al-Jazira (medieval source on Al-Mu'tamid and his court).

Ibn Khallikan, Biographical Dictionary (life of Al-Mu'tamid).

u/Beyondtheseafree — 2 months ago
▲ 5 r/islamichistory

The Legends of Tamerlane: why did Amir Timur destroy Muslim cities?

Was Timur truly a defender of Islam, or was he driven above all by ambition? How did a man with no Chinggisid blood build one of history's greatest empires? Why did he defeat the Ottoman Sultan, and yet choose not to conquer the Ottoman Empire?

In this interview, historian Ron Sela, author of The Legendary Biographies of Tamerlane, separates historical evidence from centuries of myth. We discuss Timur's rise to power, the wars against the Golden Horde, the destruction of Baghdad and Damascus, and the political ideas that shaped one of the most controversial rulers in world history.

Whether you know him as Timur or

Tamerlane, this conversation explores the man behind the legend.

#Timur #Tamerlane #History

OUTLINE

00:00 - Episode's highlights

00:28 - Timur or Tamerlane: What's the Difference?

02:00 - How Could Timur Rule Without

Chinggisid Blood?

05:10 - Timur destroyed Muslim cities. Was He Really a Defender of Islam?

09:50 - Why Did Timur Go to War Against the Golden Horde?

12:41 - Why Didn't He Conquer the Ottoman Empire?

16:06 - Why Did Everyone Claim Timur's Legacy?

youtu.be
u/Beyondtheseafree — 3 months ago
▲ 4 r/islamichistory

Why did the Mongol khans convert to Islam?

The Mongol conquests changed history.

But what happened after the victories? In this interview, historian Michael Hope explains how the empire was actually governed, why some Mongol rulers embraced Islam, how different legal traditions coexisted, and why the legacy of Mongol rule cannot be understood through conquest alone.

OUTLINE

00:00 - Episode's highlights

00:40 - Who Inherited Chinggis Khan's Empire?

02:19 - How Did the Mongols Rule Millions of Muslims?

04:04 - Why Did the Mongol Rulers Convert to Islam?

05:25 - Was Mongol Law Above Sharia?

06:08 - Did Chinggis Khan "invent" the Mongols?

07:45 - Who Ruled Anatolia After the Mongols?

09:07 - How the Mongol Conquests Shaped the Muslim World ?

11:43 - Did the Mongols Assimilate in Iran?

youtu.be
u/Beyondtheseafree — 3 months ago
▲ 5 r/islamichistory

After 2003: The Iraq Timeline Nobody Talks About, From Invasion to the 2007 Surge

When people watch footage of American soldiers inside Iraqi civilians’ homes, there is a shared feeling of uneasiness.

While such footage from the occupation of Iraq are not as abundant as other more recent conflicts are in this age of social media, they are still a lot. The footage I am referring to are the ones taken by the US soldiers themselves. The mid-2000s marked the rise of decent tapeless digital cameras which are compact enough for a person of any age to carry, including those from the military.

But what were these soldiers doing inside Iraqi civilians’ homes to begin with? This article will shed some light into this question so anyone can better understand the story.

Over the past few weeks, a footage I shared in the Invisible Orders profile capturing US soldiers being inside Iraqi civilians’ homes has circulated widely across Instagram. While it has been incredible to see so many people engaging and getting to know this part of history, a lot of the surface level context has naturally become a bit mixed up in the process.

Many reposts attribute this footage to the year 2003. It is an easy mistake to make given popular misconceptions. Setting the record straight is vital, as placing these events years prior to when they actually occurred inadvertently glosses over a highly significant period leading up to when the footage was taken from.

The footage I posted is part of a collection I have been gathering for the past few months that belong to a meticulously documented period of the US occupation of Iraq: the 2007 Surge.

To understand exactly why this distinction matters, we must look at two things: the physical technology that made these recordings possible, and the chain of events that led up to the Surge itself. Below is the definitive chronological breakdown.

Part One: The Footage

During the years around 2003, film and recording equipment were heavily constrained by size and utility. Documentation during that time relied almost exclusively on bulky, taped camera systems. Consequently, footage from that era is historically scarce, if not from TV journalists, which is why they have a specific punchy, old TV look to them. One example being Saddam Hussein’s medical examination footage from December 14, 2003, which was recorded using one of these bulky cameras. [1]

Read the rest at site.

invisibleorders.substack.com
u/Beyondtheseafree — 3 months ago