u/Classified10

It won't work but like, you can do it.

The way I see it, if we forced every pregnant woman to carry out the pregnancy even if they didn't want it, we wouldn't be able to fund the cost of every single child out there. Orphanages would reach beyond max capacity and are already a dangerous way to allow children to be raised.

The only way that these children could be raised well is if every woman who carries out their pregnancy were to raise the child, as the government wouldn't be able to fund the number of unwanted children that were forced to be born.

If those mothers were to raise a child that they didn't want, truthfully I don't think that it would be in the best interests for that child, a child only has a good chance of a good mental state if both of their parents actually want and plan their children, compared to mothers who aren't ready or wanting to have children out, and for we all know, can easily lash out and hurt a child that never had to experience the pain if the mother had the abortion.

Adoption would be less of an option because if every woman is forced to have children (even if they were married to men or other women) wouldn't be willing to adopt the children of other mothers, as they would be too busy raising their own children to do so.

If we did go down the route of pro-life, eventually it would create a problem as a result of not being able to fund these children; we would have to decrease the birth rate and even start pushing for abortions for mothers who do want to have their own children, just because society can't afford it until we can start to afford a birth rate again.

As a result, we're better off living in a pro-choice would, because we can financially sustain it, an abortion doesn't cost nearly as much in comparison to not only raising children, but building structure for them, developing underwear for the future of children, to grow the food, share water, schools would be at max capacity, we wouldn't have nearly enough jobs out their for the increasing birthrates, the more people that have to utilize carbon resources the higher the rate of global warming becomes.

Abortion, on the other hand, supports the mothers who are currently not ready to be mothers by not having to be mothers, focuses on decreasing the rate of spending needed to support every child out there, allows mothers who do want their children not needing to be told that society can't have children due to birthrates going too high, and allows children to be able to grow up without having to suffer through orphanages and a decrease in adoption rates. Which is why the way I see it, we should be far more willing to support the pro-choice lifestyle in comparison to being pro-life, because the problems that occur from a pro-life are far more than just the lives of people that could've been born, who have a higher chance of wishing that they weren't born, had their parents not have wanted to carry out the pregnancy.

omaigato or some shit

I swear that every time that I enter a temporary 30 roadwork zone, everyone behind me will tailgate almost leaving no room to need to suddenly break behind me without them crashing into me and everybody in front of me will just keep going at whatever speed that they were going at and end up miles ahead of me despite that I'm going the 30 limit that I'm supposed to. The moment that I'm going 30 in a temporary zone that's got multiple lanes people will just go into the other lane and book it at 50 despite that we JUST passed a sign saying that the road limit is 30 and we're about to enter a construction work area.

Does just nobody obey the rules of the temporary road limits here or am I just overreacting?

From another university, so fucking jealous of you lot right now.