▲ 116 r/Tariffs

His wife is a MAGA state senator, and local dairies have cut ties with him—costing him 80% of his income and leaving him bankrupt

scmp.asia
u/CoulsonRay — 5 days ago
▲ 1.4k r/USNewsHub+3 crossposts

"This has been grossly abused." Watch Speaker Mike Johnson complain about the 14th Amendment seconds after the Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship.

u/CoulsonRay — 5 days ago
▲ 962 r/msnow

Trump pulled the plug on Biden’s funds for Appalachia, and the same MAGA towns he gutted are freaking out: “This is fucked up”

scmp.asia
u/CoulsonRay — 6 days ago
▲ 258 r/PoursTea

What are the chances this is just performative, so his cult followers think something is being done about it

u/CoulsonRay — 6 days ago
▲ 757 r/NoFilterFinance+1 crossposts

As billionaire wealth soars and US workers struggle, a new tax targeting the ultrarich officially hits the California ballot

u/CoulsonRay — 4 days ago
🔥 Hot ▲ 26.0k r/truebreakingnews+13 crossposts

WATCH: Stephen Miller says 'America's doors are closed fully to asylum seekers' after SCOTUS ruling

Hi r/law, doesn't this go against Article 1 of the Const.?

I thought Congress has the power to regulate immigration and asylum law.

This can't be for real? The SCOTUS actually gave this the go ahead??

Hit the brakes. Please help.

___________________________________

Just an update to this thread, to clarify SCOTUS ruling in relation to Miller's remarks:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/25/trump-news-at-glance-supreme-court

>The US supreme court has given the Trump administration a green light to block asylum seekers at the US-Mexico border, in a decision that fundamentally reshapes the US asylum system.

>The decision allows the Trump administration to revive its so-called turn-back or “metering” policy, allowing federal agents at the US border to stop migrants from physically setting foot on US soil, where federal law guarantees them the right to claim asylum and protection from persecution.

>Because US immigration law entitles migrants arriving in the US to seek asylum, the supreme court case hinged on what, exactly, it means to “arrive in”.

>Human rights advocates have said that the court’s decision allows the Trump administration to essentially invalidate international and US asylum laws, which require government officials to inspect people arriving at ports of entry and ensure that they are not being turned back to dangerous conditions.

This new policy will almost certainly increase levels of immigration not at controlled border checkpoints. Wow.

And the removal of Temporary Protected Status is going to sentence potentially thousands of people to death when they are deported back to countries that are experiencing uprising, war, famine etc. If republicans in congress apparently support this move then they should live with that on their consciences and face the consequences for not doing their jobs to check DHS on these removals. THEY WILL NEVER stand up to this president. Ever. They still have time to do the right thing the TPS statuses will be removed and the deportations can begin next week. This is sickening.

DO. YOUR. JOBS. THE PEOPLE ARE WATCHING ON THIS ONE.

Appreciated reading everyone's input and comments some of them were really moving and impactful. Thanks again r/law

u/Buster_xx — 5 days ago
▲ 949 r/freedomgold+5 crossposts

Washington just handed Iran a waiver to sell oil for US dollars, a move experts say will net the regime up to $10 billion in the next 60 days

u/CoulsonRay — 12 days ago