u/Cute-Estate-312

I own a unit in a condo which is between 2 other condos. constantly people walk from the street to the condo behind us and leave garbage everywhere. Recently a wooden fence was installed to prevent this, but it keeps getting broken down by the hoodlums going from one neighborhood to the next. I have put the fence back up a few times with screws but it keeps getting broken, and now there’s just broken fence everywhere. is there something mean but not illegal I can do to prevent people from crossing?

My HOA managmenet company is total trash, but this isnt what the post is about. On multiple occasions I have volunteered to prune the bushes and do maintenance but they say I’m not allowed to, tha they have to go with an outside company. However, there are no attempts to get a company to do these things, so we’re just left with a rachet looking yard, and still paying $7000 per year (all of us total) for yard work that no one’s doing.

So, I know this is unethical, but I also don’t feel like it harms clients, and I don’t think it makes sense. And yes, I know the thinking of “this rule doesn’t make sense so I shouldn’t have to follow it” is a slippery slope, but here goes my question:

Given that pure couples counseling (the couple as the patient) isn’t accepted by insurance, yet many therapists still bill couples under 90847 with the rationale that the other partner is part of the family system [which is murky in some circles but totally accepted in others] why can’t I bill 90837 with the identified patient while the other partner is documented as the support person?

I guess what I’m asking is: who is the fraud actually hurting in that scenario?

What is the likelihood of getting claw-backs if you document sessions as individual sessions with spouse present?

Another thing that’s true in my state is that people can no longer have 2 sessions in a day, even if one is individual and one is family therapy. I’m only mentioning that to point out that this wouldn’t be taking away from the potential types of sessions a client could otherwise have in one day if I were to bill this way.

So a few months ago I got tested for ASD. I have been diagnosed with ADHD since age 8, but over the years people said, "You seem autistic." So, even though I know the DSM5tr clearly lists for ASD you must have 2 out of 4 be true for the Restricted/Repetitive Behaviors categories, and I only have 1, I thought "maybe autism testing has more discreet criteria then the DSM?". And, alas, I was not diagnosed with ASD, but given an additional diagnosis of social anxiety. So anyway, whenever I see videos, posts, just people talking, and saying things like, "you may have autism if you..."that are very true for me, I am filled with annoyance. Taking things literally, highly sensitive to all senses, bad at making and keeping friends, easily emotionally dysregulated, doesn't make you(me) autistic. I guess I am annoyed that the neurodivergence community just decided to have their own definition of autism, only loosely based on DSM criteria. Can anyone relate?