This shit is pretty wild. Its not complete and the game has some errors but its functional and how I built up to what is on the Database website. There is a link to download it if you want to try the game I made for this video.
Hope you all have a great 4th.
I added more games, updated many of the GPUs to better reflect their real world performance in regards to one another, and added a playable game. I also added a contact button so that if you have any suggestions you can send them to me directly. I removed some duplicate and incorrect GPUs.
*The game has to be played on a keyboard for now.
* I am currently working on it. Expect possible outages.
*The first person contacted me through the contact button. I added the search feature to the compatible games as they requested.
*ANY game that does not say remastered, remake, etc is the original. disregard the release year and dx level. The one example I can give you is the COD MW 2 (or 1), it has a score of 350 but says it was release in 2019 or something. Its the old one. I am sure there are more examples of this and I will fix it in time.
I left a link to the program if you would like to download it and try it out.
I made this for my wife to use once she learns her Happy Japan Machine. I feel like this is beyond Pre-Alpha and Alpha stages If you volunteer for Beta testing and send me feedback about what is functioning correctly and what is not I will provide the final product to you for free and all future updates for free.
Please post your machine and how many needles it uses. This is geared towards multi needle machines.
Features of the program.
🎨 Core Quantization & Color Processing
<g> layers for software import.Ctrl + / -, Ctrl 0) to scale the workspace from 10% to 500%.New version. 7/1/26
Added more games.
If anyone sees anything WAY off let me know please.
GPU Performance Database (2006–2026)
If anybody wants to help the lower end cards and really old cards are all over the place. If you see any of them way out of whack let me know what card its closest to in the real world and the score the card is closest to is given in the program, I hope that makes sense. I will add a special thanks section and put your name or username (your choice) in it. I will also give you a copy that can be run offline.
It is searchable and shows you what video card is comparable in speed to another video card. Tweaking it now and then will post a link for you to try.
Still working on it but it's coming out great! This was done on my machine, locally. I used LM Studio.
Still working on it. Currently writing a user guide to add to the help section.
A Week With My Nimo GME1s eGPU
The Nimo GME1s sounds too good to be true, but once you start using it, you realize someone finally built an eGPU dock for people who move around with their machines. It’s compact, it’s clean, and most importantly, it doesn’t restrict you to only Thunderbolt the way most eGPU setups do.
At its core is AMD’s Radeon RX 7600M XT, a mobile RDNA3 GPU that lands in the same performance neighborhood as mid‑range laptop RTX 3070/4060 class hardware. Notebookcheck’s aggregated performance rating places it 12% above the RX 7600M and just a hair behind the Radeon 8060S and RTX 4060 Laptop GPUs in some scenarios.
That’s a strong starting point for a dock this small.
Performance & Bandwidth: Where the GME1s Surprised Me
The GME1s gives you two ways to connect:
OCuLink is the star here. It avoids the PCIe bottleneck that plagues Thunderbolt‑based docks, and in practice you get extremely close to the GPU’s native performance. USB‑C 80Gbps (Thunderbolt 5) isn’t quite as lossless, but it’s still noticeably better than older TB3/TB4 enclosures.
The RX 7600M XT itself is no slouch. Notebookcheck’s combined synthetic score puts it above the RTX 3070 Laptop GPU and just under the RTX 4060 Laptop GPU. In real gaming terms, that translates to:
For a 120W mobile GPU, that’s exactly where you’d want it to land.
Display Output: Modern Ports
Nimo didn’t cheap out on the ports. You get:
That means 8K60 or dual 4K120, which is more than enough for multi monitor work. Many eGPU docks still ship with DP 1.4, so this alone puts the GME1s ahead of the pack.
The 0.8L Chassis: Small, Practical, and Portable
This is where the GME1s really separates itself.
The entire dock is 0.8 liters—smaller than most SFF PC cases—and it somehow fits a 240W internal PSU. No external power brick, spaghetti cables, and no massive footprint.
It’s the first eGPU I’ve used that genuinely feels like it belongs in a backpack.
One‑Cable Setup & 65W PD Charging
If your laptop supports it, you can plug in a single USB‑C cable and get:
It’s not enough wattage for big workstation laptops, but for thin‑and‑lights, business, or handheld PCs, it’s perfect.
Stability & Build Quality
Nimo added proper ESD protection and EMI shielding, which matters more than people think. High‑bandwidth links like OCuLink can get finicky under electrical noise, but the GME1s stays stable even under long gaming or rendering sessions.
It feels like a device built by people who tested it under load instead of just assembling parts.
Where It Falls Short
No product is perfect, and the GME1s has a few limitations:
But none of these should be deal‑breakers for the audience this dock is aimed at.
Let’s take a closer look at the two ways of connecting this to your laptop or VR headset.
OCuLink vs Thunderbolt 5 — What Really Happens in an eGPU Setup
Thunderbolt 5 was supposed to be the generation that finally closed the gap with OCuLink. On paper, it even looks like it should win: 80 Gbps bidirectional bandwidth versus OCuLink’s PCIe 4.0 x4 limit of 64 Gbps. But once people started testing real hardware, the story changed fast.
The short version: Thunderbolt 5 is better than older TB standards, but OCuLink still delivers higher and more consistent eGPU performance.
Why OCuLink Still Wins in Practice
1. Direct PCIe vs Controller Overhead
Thunderbolt 5 still routes PCIe traffic through a controller at both ends, and that extra hop adds overhead. OCuLink doesn’t do any of that — it’s a straight PCIe extension. XDA’s analysis makes this point very clear: even though TB5 advertises more bandwidth, OCuLink’s direct PCIe path keeps latency lower and data flow more stable.
This becomes especially noticeable when the GPU is under heavy load.
2. Real Gaming Benchmarks: OCuLink Leads
Multiple independent tests all land on the same conclusion:
Across all sources, the pattern is consistent: OCuLink is 10–20% faster in real games, sometimes more in titles that stream assets aggressively.
3. Bandwidth Measurements Back It Up
Even when Thunderbolt 5 gets close on raw throughput, it still falls short:
These numbers come from Try Some Tech’s measurements, cited by WhatPSU and Guru3D. OCuLink simply moves more data, more consistently.
4. Ray Tracing Shows the Gap Even More
Ray‑traced games push a lot more CPU↔GPU traffic. XDA notes that even with TB5’s improvements, ray‑traced titles still show lower averages and less consistent frame delivery on Thunderbolt 5 compared to OCuLink.
This is exactly the kind of workload where controller overhead hurts.
5. AI Workloads Tell a Different Story (But Still Favor OCuLink)
For AI inference, once the model is loaded, the link matters less — but not zero:
This comes from LocalAI Master’s controlled testing across TB4, USB4, TB5, and OCuLink. If you swap models often, OCuLink is a huge quality‑of‑life upgrade.
So Which One Should You Use?
OCuLink
Thunderbolt 5
TLDR
Thunderbolt 5 is the best Thunderbolt has ever been, but it still isn’t OCuLink.
If you care about maximum gaming performance, smooth frame delivery, or bandwidth‑heavy workloads, OCuLink remains the superior choice. If you care about convenience, charging, and plug‑and‑play, Thunderbolt 5 is the more practical option.
But in a pure performance fight? OCuLink still wins.
My gaming results.
My 5 Game Review - https://youtu.be/H5wCHu7dq8Q
I also tested the three newest Spiderman games on the GME1s - https://youtu.be/ybfBtKM0Yeg
Here are more games comparing the performance of a Radeon 890m to the GME1s
My opinion of NimoPC in general.
NimoPC has built its reputation around compact systems that prioritize their customers savings, thermal efficiency, and high‑bandwidth I/O rather than cosmetic features. Their designs tend to follow a workstation‑first philosophy: High performance, clean VRM layouts, and heatsinks that are overpowered relative to the chassis volume. Across their laptops and mini PCs, Nimo consistently integrates features that most mainstream OEMs avoid due to cost or complexity. Native OCuLink ports, full‑speed USB4 controllers, and PCIe topologies that don’t bottleneck the GPU or NVMe drives. It’s clear their engineering team optimizes around sustained performance rather than peak boost numbers.
What stands out most is how NimoPC approaches system integration. Their devices often use over engineered heatsinks, multiple fans, and direct‑touch heatpipe arrays even in sub‑liter enclosures, remaining stable under continuous AI inference, gaming, or GPU‑accelerated workloads. NimoPC hardware behaves more like a scaled‑down workstation platform than a consumer device. For users running local AI models, Games, GPU‑heavy workflows, or high‑bandwidth external accelerators, the company’s machines offer a level of electrical and thermal headroom that’s rare in this size class.
Final Thoughts
The Nimo GME1s is one of the most thoughtfully designed eGPU docks I’ve used. It’s compact, quiet, stable, and delivers the RX 7600M XT’s performance without the usual bandwidth penalties—especially over OCuLink.
If you’re a student, gamer, creator, or someone who travels with a business, thin‑and‑light laptop or handheld PC, this thing makes a huge difference. It’s not trying to replace a desktop GPU; it’s trying to give you real performance in a portable, self‑contained
Package.
…..And it succeeds.
Links to the devices I own. Prices are current prices and are subject to change.
My eGPU - Nimo Claw RX 7600M XT eGPU Dock | Nimo$599.99
My main laptop - Nimo 17.3" AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Laptop with 144HZ Refresh Rate | Nimo$859.99
My Mini PC - Nimo's Office & Gaming AI PC - AMD Ryzen™ AI Max+ 395 | Nimo$2,999.99
My Wife’s Laptop - Nimo 15.6" N155 R7 6800H FHD Laptop | Nimo$419.99
My Son’s Laptop – To be determined, lol.
A Week With My Nimo GME1s eGPU
The Nimo GME1s sounds too good to be true, but once you start using it, you realize someone finally built an eGPU dock for people who move around with their machines. It’s compact, it’s clean, and most importantly, it doesn’t restrict you to only Thunderbolt the way most eGPU setups do.
At its core is AMD’s Radeon RX 7600M XT, a mobile RDNA3 GPU that lands in the same performance neighborhood as mid‑range laptop RTX 3070/4060 class hardware. Notebookcheck’s aggregated performance rating places it 12% above the RX 7600M and just a hair behind the Radeon 8060S and RTX 4060 Laptop GPUs in some scenarios.
That’s a strong starting point for a dock this small.
Performance & Bandwidth: Where the GME1s Surprised Me
The GME1s gives you two ways to connect:
OCuLink is the star here. It avoids the PCIe bottleneck that plagues Thunderbolt‑based docks, and in practice you get extremely close to the GPU’s native performance. USB‑C 80Gbps (Thunderbolt 5) isn’t quite as lossless, but it’s still noticeably better than older TB3/TB4 enclosures.
The RX 7600M XT itself is no slouch. Notebookcheck’s combined synthetic score puts it above the RTX 3070 Laptop GPU and just under the RTX 4060 Laptop GPU. In real gaming terms, that translates to:
For a 120W mobile GPU, that’s exactly where you’d want it to land.
Display Output: Modern Ports
Nimo didn’t cheap out on the ports. You get:
That means 8K60 or dual 4K120, which is more than enough for multi monitor work. Many eGPU docks still ship with DP 1.4, so this alone puts the GME1s ahead of the pack.
The 0.8L Chassis: Small, Practical, and Portable
This is where the GME1s really separates itself.
The entire dock is 0.8 liters—smaller than most SFF PC cases—and it somehow fits a 240W internal PSU. No external power brick, spaghetti cables, and no massive footprint.
It’s the first eGPU I’ve used that genuinely feels like it belongs in a backpack.
One‑Cable Setup & 65W PD Charging
If your laptop supports it, you can plug in a single USB‑C cable and get:
It’s not enough wattage for big workstation laptops, but for thin‑and‑lights, business, or handheld PCs, it’s perfect.
Stability & Build Quality
Nimo added proper ESD protection and EMI shielding, which matters more than people think. High‑bandwidth links like OCuLink can get finicky under electrical noise, but the GME1s stays stable even under long gaming or rendering sessions.
It feels like a device built by people who tested it under load instead of just assembling parts.
Where It Falls Short
No product is perfect, and the GME1s has a few limitations:
But none of these should be deal‑breakers for the audience this dock is aimed at.
Let’s take a closer look at the two ways of connecting this to your laptop or VR headset.
OCuLink vs Thunderbolt 5 — What Really Happens in an eGPU Setup
Thunderbolt 5 was supposed to be the generation that finally closed the gap with OCuLink. On paper, it even looks like it should win: 80 Gbps bidirectional bandwidth versus OCuLink’s PCIe 4.0 x4 limit of 64 Gbps. But once people started testing real hardware, the story changed fast.
The short version: Thunderbolt 5 is better than older TB standards, but OCuLink still delivers higher and more consistent eGPU performance.
Why OCuLink Still Wins in Practice
1. Direct PCIe vs Controller Overhead
Thunderbolt 5 still routes PCIe traffic through a controller at both ends, and that extra hop adds overhead. OCuLink doesn’t do any of that — it’s a straight PCIe extension. XDA’s analysis makes this point very clear: even though TB5 advertises more bandwidth, OCuLink’s direct PCIe path keeps latency lower and data flow more stable.
This becomes especially noticeable when the GPU is under heavy load.
2. Real Gaming Benchmarks: OCuLink Leads
Multiple independent tests all land on the same conclusion:
Across all sources, the pattern is consistent: OCuLink is 10–20% faster in real games, sometimes more in titles that stream assets aggressively.
3. Bandwidth Measurements Back It Up
Even when Thunderbolt 5 gets close on raw throughput, it still falls short:
These numbers come from Try Some Tech’s measurements, cited by WhatPSU and Guru3D. OCuLink simply moves more data, more consistently.
4. Ray Tracing Shows the Gap Even More
Ray‑traced games push a lot more CPU↔GPU traffic. XDA notes that even with TB5’s improvements, ray‑traced titles still show lower averages and less consistent frame delivery on Thunderbolt 5 compared to OCuLink.
This is exactly the kind of workload where controller overhead hurts.
5. AI Workloads Tell a Different Story (But Still Favor OCuLink)
For AI inference, once the model is loaded, the link matters less — but not zero:
This comes from LocalAI Master’s controlled testing across TB4, USB4, TB5, and OCuLink. If you swap models often, OCuLink is a huge quality‑of‑life upgrade.
So Which One Should You Use?
OCuLink
Thunderbolt 5
TLDR
Thunderbolt 5 is the best Thunderbolt has ever been, but it still isn’t OCuLink.
If you care about maximum gaming performance, smooth frame delivery, or bandwidth‑heavy workloads, OCuLink remains the superior choice. If you care about convenience, charging, and plug‑and‑play, Thunderbolt 5 is the more practical option.
But in a pure performance fight? OCuLink still wins.
My gaming results.
My 5 Game Review - https://youtu.be/H5wCHu7dq8Q
I also tested the three newest Spiderman games on the GME1s - https://youtu.be/ybfBtKM0Yeg
Here are more games comparing the performance of a Radeon 890m to the GME1s
My opinion of NimoPC in general.
NimoPC has built its reputation around compact systems that prioritize their customers savings, thermal efficiency, and high‑bandwidth I/O rather than cosmetic features. Their designs tend to follow a workstation‑first philosophy: High performance, clean VRM layouts, and heatsinks that are overpowered relative to the chassis volume. Across their laptops and mini PCs, Nimo consistently integrates features that most mainstream OEMs avoid due to cost or complexity. Native OCuLink ports, full‑speed USB4 controllers, and PCIe topologies that don’t bottleneck the GPU or NVMe drives. It’s clear their engineering team optimizes around sustained performance rather than peak boost numbers.
What stands out most is how NimoPC approaches system integration. Their devices often use over engineered heatsinks, multiple fans, and direct‑touch heatpipe arrays even in sub‑liter enclosures, remaining stable under continuous AI inference, gaming, or GPU‑accelerated workloads. NimoPC hardware behaves more like a scaled‑down workstation platform than a consumer device. For users running local AI models, Games, GPU‑heavy workflows, or high‑bandwidth external accelerators, the company’s machines offer a level of electrical and thermal headroom that’s rare in this size class.
Final Thoughts
The Nimo GME1s is one of the most thoughtfully designed eGPU docks I’ve used. It’s compact, quiet, stable, and delivers the RX 7600M XT’s performance without the usual bandwidth penalties—especially over OCuLink.
If you’re a student, gamer, creator, or someone who travels with a business, thin‑and‑light laptop or handheld PC, this thing makes a huge difference. It’s not trying to replace a desktop GPU; it’s trying to give you real performance in a portable, self‑contained
Package.
…..And it succeeds.
Links to the devices I own. Prices are current prices and are subject to change.
My eGPU - Nimo Claw RX 7600M XT eGPU Dock | Nimo$599.99
My main laptop - Nimo 17.3" AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Laptop with 144HZ Refresh Rate | Nimo$859.99
My Mini PC - Nimo's Office & Gaming AI PC - AMD Ryzen™ AI Max+ 395 | Nimo$2,999.99
My Wife’s Laptop - Nimo 15.6" N155 R7 6800H FHD Laptop | Nimo$419.99
My Son’s Laptop – To be determined, lol.
A Week With My Nimo GME1s eGPU
The Nimo GME1s sounds too good to be true, but once you start using it, you realize someone finally built an eGPU dock for people who move around with their machines. It’s compact, it’s clean, and most importantly, it doesn’t restrict you to only Thunderbolt the way most eGPU setups do.
At its core is AMD’s Radeon RX 7600M XT, a mobile RDNA3 GPU that lands in the same performance neighborhood as mid‑range laptop RTX 3070/4060 class hardware. Notebookcheck’s aggregated performance rating places it 12% above the RX 7600M and just a hair behind the Radeon 8060S and RTX 4060 Laptop GPUs in some scenarios.
That’s a strong starting point for a dock this small.
Performance & Bandwidth: Where the GME1s Surprised Me
The GME1s gives you two ways to connect:
OCuLink is the star here. It avoids the PCIe bottleneck that plagues Thunderbolt‑based docks, and in practice you get extremely close to the GPU’s native performance. USB‑C 80Gbps (Thunderbolt 5) isn’t quite as lossless, but it’s still noticeably better than older TB3/TB4 enclosures.
The RX 7600M XT itself is no slouch. Notebookcheck’s combined synthetic score puts it above the RTX 3070 Laptop GPU and just under the RTX 4060 Laptop GPU. In real gaming terms, that translates to:
For a 120W mobile GPU, that’s exactly where you’d want it to land.
Display Output: Modern Ports
Nimo didn’t cheap out on the ports. You get:
That means 8K60 or dual 4K120, which is more than enough for multi monitor work. Many eGPU docks still ship with DP 1.4, so this alone puts the GME1s ahead of the pack.
The 0.8L Chassis: Small, Practical, and Portable
This is where the GME1s really separates itself.
The entire dock is 0.8 liters—smaller than most SFF PC cases—and it somehow fits a 240W internal PSU. No external power brick, spaghetti cables, and no massive footprint.
It’s the first eGPU I’ve used that genuinely feels like it belongs in a backpack.
One‑Cable Setup & 65W PD Charging
If your laptop supports it, you can plug in a single USB‑C cable and get:
It’s not enough wattage for big workstation laptops, but for thin‑and‑lights, business, or handheld PCs, it’s perfect.
Stability & Build Quality
Nimo added proper ESD protection and EMI shielding, which matters more than people think. High‑bandwidth links like OCuLink can get finicky under electrical noise, but the GME1s stays stable even under long gaming or rendering sessions.
It feels like a device built by people who tested it under load instead of just assembling parts.
Where It Falls Short
No product is perfect, and the GME1s has a few limitations:
But none of these should be deal‑breakers for the audience this dock is aimed at.
Let’s take a closer look at the two ways of connecting this to your laptop or VR headset.
OCuLink vs Thunderbolt 5 — What Really Happens in an eGPU Setup
Thunderbolt 5 was supposed to be the generation that finally closed the gap with OCuLink. On paper, it even looks like it should win: 80 Gbps bidirectional bandwidth versus OCuLink’s PCIe 4.0 x4 limit of 64 Gbps. But once people started testing real hardware, the story changed fast.
The short version: Thunderbolt 5 is better than older TB standards, but OCuLink still delivers higher and more consistent eGPU performance.
Why OCuLink Still Wins in Practice
1. Direct PCIe vs Controller Overhead
Thunderbolt 5 still routes PCIe traffic through a controller at both ends, and that extra hop adds overhead. OCuLink doesn’t do any of that — it’s a straight PCIe extension. XDA’s analysis makes this point very clear: even though TB5 advertises more bandwidth, OCuLink’s direct PCIe path keeps latency lower and data flow more stable.
This becomes especially noticeable when the GPU is under heavy load.
2. Real Gaming Benchmarks: OCuLink Leads
Multiple independent tests all land on the same conclusion:
Across all sources, the pattern is consistent: OCuLink is 10–20% faster in real games, sometimes more in titles that stream assets aggressively.
3. Bandwidth Measurements Back It Up
Even when Thunderbolt 5 gets close on raw throughput, it still falls short:
These numbers come from Try Some Tech’s measurements, cited by WhatPSU and Guru3D. OCuLink simply moves more data, more consistently.
4. Ray Tracing Shows the Gap Even More
Ray‑traced games push a lot more CPU↔GPU traffic. XDA notes that even with TB5’s improvements, ray‑traced titles still show lower averages and less consistent frame delivery on Thunderbolt 5 compared to OCuLink.
This is exactly the kind of workload where controller overhead hurts.
5. AI Workloads Tell a Different Story (But Still Favor OCuLink)
For AI inference, once the model is loaded, the link matters less — but not zero:
This comes from LocalAI Master’s controlled testing across TB4, USB4, TB5, and OCuLink. If you swap models often, OCuLink is a huge quality‑of‑life upgrade.
So Which One Should You Use?
OCuLink
Thunderbolt 5
TLDR
Thunderbolt 5 is the best Thunderbolt has ever been, but it still isn’t OCuLink.
If you care about maximum gaming performance, smooth frame delivery, or bandwidth‑heavy workloads, OCuLink remains the superior choice. If you care about convenience, charging, and plug‑and‑play, Thunderbolt 5 is the more practical option.
But in a pure performance fight? OCuLink still wins.
My gaming results.
My 5 Game Review - https://youtu.be/H5wCHu7dq8Q
I also tested the three newest Spiderman games on the GME1s - https://youtu.be/ybfBtKM0Yeg
Here are more games comparing the performance of a Radeon 890m to the GME1s
My opinion of NimoPC in general.
NimoPC has built its reputation around compact systems that prioritize their customers savings, thermal efficiency, and high‑bandwidth I/O rather than cosmetic features. Their designs tend to follow a workstation‑first philosophy: High performance, clean VRM layouts, and heatsinks that are overpowered relative to the chassis volume. Across their laptops and mini PCs, Nimo consistently integrates features that most mainstream OEMs avoid due to cost or complexity. Native OCuLink ports, full‑speed USB4 controllers, and PCIe topologies that don’t bottleneck the GPU or NVMe drives. It’s clear their engineering team optimizes around sustained performance rather than peak boost numbers.
What stands out most is how NimoPC approaches system integration. Their devices often use over engineered heatsinks, multiple fans, and direct‑touch heatpipe arrays even in sub‑liter enclosures, remaining stable under continuous AI inference, gaming, or GPU‑accelerated workloads. NimoPC hardware behaves more like a scaled‑down workstation platform than a consumer device. For users running local AI models, Games, GPU‑heavy workflows, or high‑bandwidth external accelerators, the company’s machines offer a level of electrical and thermal headroom that’s rare in this size class.
Final Thoughts
The Nimo GME1s is one of the most thoughtfully designed eGPU docks I’ve used. It’s compact, quiet, stable, and delivers the RX 7600M XT’s performance without the usual bandwidth penalties—especially over OCuLink.
If you’re a student, gamer, creator, or someone who travels with a business, thin‑and‑light laptop or handheld PC, this thing makes a huge difference. It’s not trying to replace a desktop GPU; it’s trying to give you real performance in a portable, self‑contained
Package.
…..And it succeeds.
Links to the devices I own. Prices are current prices and are subject to change.
My eGPU - Nimo Claw RX 7600M XT eGPU Dock | Nimo$599.99
My main laptop - Nimo 17.3" AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Laptop with 144HZ Refresh Rate | Nimo$859.99
My Mini PC - Nimo's Office & Gaming AI PC - AMD Ryzen™ AI Max+ 395 | Nimo$2,999.99
My Wife’s Laptop - Nimo 15.6" N155 R7 6800H FHD Laptop | Nimo$419.99
My Son’s Laptop – To be determined, lol.
I am from the United States. Never been outside the country but I have visited several States.
Specifically, do you take an image and reduce its color count so that it can be easily embroidered?
I think this may run on a 1050ti. If anyone has/can try it on one please let me know if you can average 30fps 720p/fsr max performance if needed.
Amazing performance out of this new eGPU from NimoPC.
I went from averaging 40ish FPS outside in Oblivion Remake on high with FSR and framegen to averaging over 100fps no framegen and no fsr ultra settings. The only problem is since I have two nvme drives in my laptop the connection for my eGPU is at 4x PCIe instead of 8x PCIe. I am losing a good 15 to 25% performance on my eGPU because of it. If anyone is interested in this here is a link to the sales page.
Nimo Claw RX 7600M XT eGPU Dock | Nimo$599.99
I will say the Ray Tracing performance of the eGPU is disappointing but that's not Nimo's fault. It's just that way with RDNA 3 and eGPUs. Here is some testing I did as well to show the difference between the two GPUs.
It runs pretty well. I think it may run on several different iGPU's if you can handle super low resolutions.
