The Queens of Manticore

I’ve read the Manticore Ascendant books and most of the original Honor Harrington books as well, and it seems to me the Queens of Manticore seem to be the only monarchs of that star nation that actually accomplish anything (thought I say that as loosely as I can since they are constitutional monarchs and therefore can’t really accomplish much of anything). The two Kings in the Manticore shown in Ascendant don’t seem to accomplish anything or do anything to neutralize their opposition, as opposed to Elizabeth II who all but violates the constitution by having her children of a peer of the realm be legitimatized

reddit.com
u/EmperorTrajan117 — 11 days ago

I know this is an absolutist subreddit, but are there any Constitutional Monarchs you admire?

I personally admire George III because he was very active in his government, at least until 1810 when his condition permanently deteriorated

reddit.com
u/EmperorTrajan117 — 14 days ago

On Tyranny

I believe, much like Nazi and Genocide, the words Tyrant and Tyranny are often thrown about so many times that it’s lost its meaning. Having been an absolute monarchist for many years, I have come to ask myself a question; what is tyranny. For me, in the end I go with the Aristotelian meaning of both monarchy and tyranny; Monarchy is the rule of one for the good of all while Tyranny is the rule of one for the good of self. It also makes me realize how often we make certain rulers out to be tyrants because they make decisions we don’t agree with, which shows how many of us don’t see a bigger picture beyond our personal lives or circle. What makes a Tyrant? Is it brutality? Not really, some of the greatest Kings and Emperors had to be brutal at times. Is it the fact they wield absolute power and the people have no say? Certainly not, since that is just envy and pride talking. What about when a ruler makes a questionable decision one doesn’t agree with? Not that either, controversial does not mean tyrannical. Tyranny is when the ruler rules only for the benefit of himself; Caligula, Commodus, Nero, Richard II, Alexios IV, those were tyrants. Justinian I, Vald the Impaler, Ivan IV “the Terrible”, all three of them Could be brutal, but they were not tyrants.

reddit.com
u/EmperorTrajan117 — 1 month ago

Does anyone have major examples of a failed Revolution against an Absolute Monarchy?

The only one I can think of is the Decembrist Revolt of 1825 In imperial Russia

u/EmperorTrajan117 — 1 month ago
▲ 24 r/absolutemonarchism+1 crossposts

What are your opinions on the Fronde

For me, maybe it’s my monarchist bias, but I sided with the King the whole time. It’s like the reverse English Civil War, except this time no King lost his head and the Royalists won

u/EmperorTrajan117 — 1 month ago

Has Anyone Else been ridiculed for being an Absolute Monarchist?

Being an American, I have faced my fair share of ridicule both online and in real time for being an absolute monarchist. Has anyone else felt that same ridicule? Tell your story

reddit.com
u/EmperorTrajan117 — 2 months ago

If Korra’s actions changed the world more in a few Years than all the previous Avatars did in their lifetimes…that means that all the previous Avatars failed in their duties

Think about it. Korra did all of this, what the hell was wrong with the other Avatars? They should’ve been doing this all along. This clearly shows that Aang, Roku, Kiyoshi, all of them were failures as Avatars because they didn’t change the world like she did

u/EmperorTrajan117 — 2 months ago