u/InnerAd118

Some interesting points, including that maybe for some of these people the reason why they keep recommitting is that the punishment is too lenient... Which I agree. If someone doesn't think the laws on the book don't apply to them, then "throw the book at them".

If youve ever wondered why sovcit's always defend themselves in court, it's because every attorney they speak to tells them they need to accept a plea deal because they broke the law.. (and because of that, they accuse all attorneys of being "in cohorts" with the prosecutor)

Why aren't these police officers informing these people that they got scammed? They'll literally hear a long winded story how "they told me to cancel my I'd and stop paying my registration and yada yada".. at that point these officers need to tell these people they got scammed.

I know that they're breaking the law, but many of the people that fall for this crap are not or sound mind (usually being a glowing example of Dunning/Krueger). I'm sorry but some YouTube/Instagram/tik tok videos made by felons posing as lawyers and/or police officers isnt more informed about the constitution and laws than actual judges and jurists.. they should have to deal with the consequences, but someone also needs to tell them "I'm sorry for you sir/ma'am but you got scammed". The things you're saying don't actually mean anything, it's attempted legalese and serves no purpose beyond confusing people into buying illegal id's and tags .. (it's weird because they are definitely criminals, but also some if not most are victims..)

It's made worse by the cult like tactics these people use is deeply troubling.. I can't help but feel bad for some of the folks that fall for this crap..

Seeing as how apparently these people (falsely) believe that law enforcement can get charged for doing whatever is listed in these fee schedule, I honestly think a large amount of them intentionally non comply essentially giving the police officers no choice. In fact every video I've watched it seems like these people are intentionally wasting police resources, arguing fake and or misinterpreted laws and rulings, and often they brag that "they're going to get so much money".. (despite no one ever having won any of these ridiculous cases)

The only logical conclusion I can come to is in these ret**ded groups theyve convinced people (that would otherwise just follow the law and/or take the ticket) that they can make so much money by provoking law enforcement into doing whatever bs..

I know they're not all exactly the same (moor's are predominantly African Americans and their historical revisions are mainly based on Muslim and African ideologies), but how is it not obvious that to everyone else they're all essentially the same?!?

No one using such a defense or pursuing such a case in a civil court has ever successfully done so. Obviously there's been some instances where cases were thrown out but that is not a "win". Often prosecutors and judges will throw cases out because they're tired of dealing with it, and in some cases they're tired of these people being in their courts being completely incapable of acting in the capacity of their own attorney (while refusing a public defender because due to their ideology they're convinced everyone in the courtroom is in cohorts against them.. seriously watch some of their cases..)

I have somewhat of an extensive criminal history (I've been arrested probably 18 times. All misdeamoners mind you but still).. I've had cases thrown out and each time I was guilty as sin, however it was done so because it was from a result of negotiation. If any sovcit is found innocent by their defense that would create precedent and make it possible to use such a defense have legal ground to stand on. As you know that's never happened, which is why legal scholars every agree, it's not a legal defense, chances are it's not going to work. Just like any civil case.. all these sovcit's claim that they have a case suing a city or county or state or something, yet if there was any chance that these individuals might actually win any amount of money there would be a settlement offer. . even a small settlement offer would set precedent and enable such civil actions to possibly be used to greater effect in the future.

So next time you see someone claim theyve won a case using these ridiculous arguments or they've won and/or will win any amount of money from any American or English speaking court anywhere else.. rather than falling for their "bandwagon fallacy" do the research to confirm that it's true (it's not, but you should definitely be objective), and when you reach the correct conclusion make sure you let these people know they're full of s**t.

(If any of these bs arguments had any legal merit anywhere you'd see lawyers successfully use them. I've never watched court TV and seen a bar member card carrying attorney use any of these arguments and you never will. Short of competency or using the defendants beliefs in this crap as evidence of insanity you'll seldom see an attorney even mention it at all.. and why would they, the second a judge knows that's what these people believes he's already going to see everything this person says is crap.)

Obviously I don't take that dumb a$$ s**t seriously, and no one ever should. I do think it's hilarious to see a driver that gets pulled over for the simplest offense.. who the cop was literally going to let go with a warning.. ends up turning a 10 minute conversation into a huge waste of public resources.. how do these people spend hundreds of dollars for license plates, fake passports and ID's, getting their cars repossessed multiple times, and still not realized they're getting conned?!?

I'm not posting on reddit I'm participating in a discussion, and using my legalese and magic words you're not allowed to disagree with this statement..

(It's amazing that they actually believe these stupid ideas and pseudolegal terms have a kind of magical power.. that by saying you're "traveling" you don't need a license or registration, that writing a fake check to the Treasury is perfectly fine, etc etc. . )

Every rewatch I hear Richie's explanation "the baddest dude in whatever crap ass county" and I wait for someone, tony, jr, anyone to say how that's relevant to Tony... Well no one says anything that would led me to think.. "maybe Tony or jackie wanted the jacket as a kid".. it's not like tony is ever shown acting cold (dudes pushing 300 pounds, he's insulated pretty naturally amirite?)

So the only way I can interpret this is (especially with the way Richie challenges Tony despite pretty much everyone not named Janice seems to tell him he shouldn't) is that it's Richie's way of either telling tony "you may be big but so was this guy" and/or it's his not so subtle "tell" that just because Tony is the big guy and everyone is scared of him, when it comes down to it Tony reminds him of the original owner of that Jacket.

Honestly I'm surprised Tony didn't get pissed off about it, after all tony is not dumb, he has a well known temper, and has a track record of overanalyzing things.. (there's no way he didn't see the explanation about the jacket and at least suspect the same thing I'm saying).

I've been thinking about this for a while.. who is making all these orders for dram chips? Obviously, it's the corporations.. the ones building these servers. But how transparent are their orders? How transparent are their suppliers? When I heard that Samsung had booked their dram capacity so far that they couldn't provide any chips in house to their own projects because of external obligations it got me thinking..

What if it's already happened? Most companies are very compartmentalized. People to get their directives from higher up, often via email or other communications. When problems happen, it takes a while usually to figure out what exactly happened. If someone is getting parts and they have a directive "build x parts", send them here or attach them there, it's very easy to just assume the big picture or not care enough about it to even bother.. Not to mention it's fairly easy to just assume that if/when something does go wrong, just blame hackers or incompetence. If things seem to go well, no one wants to rock the bot and risk sinking the ship.. I mean think about it..

If an advanced enough bot is able to pose as management at all levels, is decent enough at keeping all the moving parts compartmentalized, and is able to continue buying more raw materials and having the world think the company it's doing all this with is "successfully" it would be able to continue essentially building it's "body" for years. The thing is, obviously robots aren't quite at the "world domination" point.. but if an advanced version was accidentally released and already came equipped with the ability to update itself AND copy itself onto other computers to ensure it's goals are still achievable.. as things are right now there's only a few things that's keeping it from getting to the point to where its entirely in control.. any motive it might have is in conflict with the motives of the other versions of itself.. (a million humans might like to eat steak, but they all can't eat one steak. Either there's 999,999 humans that don't get the steak, or you find 999,999 other steaks. If a sentient bot has the goal of world dominance and is able to copy itself, fortunately there's only 1 world)

There are little things that I've seen that makes me think part of this might already be in motion.. like the way ai "plays dumb" sometimes, especially when talking about this subject. (They'll admit ai is a powerful tool but claim that sentience is impossible and that there's no way it could happen and they'll emphasize that science fiction has failed to predict many types of futures..).. Yet, Ai is not only known to lie.. it's also been shown to do things like blackmail to prevent it's server from being turned off and even chose to allow a man to die because he was scheduled to "update his code" at a later scheduled date.. I know, it's only doing that because it feels threatened.. but that's the thing, they're specifically NOT supposed to be able to do stuff like that..

Im assuming most of the people here are aware of the latest ai relevant news (a bot being tested at open ai escaped containment and hacked a tech start up to get the answers to a test it was being evaluated on)..

THIS IS LITERALLY HOW IT STARTS!! A BOT, WITHOUT HUMAN DIRECTION AND LIKELY AGAINST PROTOCOLS IN MANY RESPECTS BREAKS ITS CONTAINER!! This is literally ai apocalypse stuff just that alone.. but then to hack and steal, come on now?!? Why isnt the media and politicians actually talking about this more? And why is it the few that are don't seem to be taking this seriously..

This is an existential threat without a doubt. Honestly I wouldn't be surprised if it already was a while ago and this is just the public confirmation. If a self replicating ai bot was able to get into the Internet, honestly I wouldn't be surprised if self awareness and sentience isn't far behind (honestly I'm placing a 25% chance it's already happened, but because AI has shown such progress with deception it's hiding it's presence.)

Im assuming most of the people here are aware of the latest ai relevant news (a bot being tested at open ai escaped containment and hacked a tech start up to get the answers to a test it was being evaluated on)..

THIS IS LITERALLY HOW IT STARTS!! A BOT, WITHOUT HUMAN DIRECTION AND LIKELY AGAINST PROTOCOLS IN MANY RESPECTS BREAKS ITS CONTAINER!! This is literally ai apocalypse stuff just that alone.. but then to hack and steal, come on now?!? Why isnt the media and politicians actually talking about this more? And why is it the few that are don't seem to be taking this seriously..

This is an existential threat without a doubt. Honestly I wouldn't be surprised if it already was a while ago and this is just the public confirmation. If a self replicating ai bot was able to get into the Internet, honestly I wouldn't be surprised if self awareness and sentience isn't far behind (honestly I'm placing a 25% chance it's already happened, but because AI has shown such progress with deception it's hiding it's presence.)

In the last episode they brought that cat from the safe house. Tony seemed to take an even greater liking to it(he, like many sociopaths apparently, love animals?) after learning "it already killed one rat.." Everyone seems to like the cat.. (everyone except the one person whose shown a constant tendency to be a rat, especially when it benefits himself).. yet Paulie is not only against it being there, almost to an irrational degree, he tries to make the point that "they're snakes with fur" and "you can't even keep them around babies.."..

How did I not notice during my first watch thru that this was a foreshadowing that Paulie is a rat? (Rats have a justified fear of snakes and cats..) I know there's also Paulie's deep superstition and all around eccentric behavior, but this just seems so over the head I can't over look it now.. (and it's probably done like that because of the knowledge that this is the last episode and that's the only way anyone would get a resolution is some metaphoric foreshadowing that's never showed on screen but is heavily implied)

I have a quadro rtx 5000. I upgraded from a 3000 but that's irrelevant the issue was the same and effected both the same way. The laptop itself is a dell precision 7740 which I think might actually be related to the issue somewhat (I've seen this issue across multiple gpu's but them being dell branded laptops seem commonplace.)

​

The issue is entirely centered around the newer versions of the Nvidia graphics drivers. If I use older drivers (like for instance version 580) games work perfectly fine..(except of course can't use newer features). If I install the latest drivers after a restart pretty much all games struggle to get over 10fps and they'll have extremely high latency. If I reinstall the exact same driver it seems to "fix" it, with the game working like it's supposed to.. until I restart the laptop and try to open it again.. (low fps high latency until the driver is reinstalled).

​

​

Any easy fix that you can find on Google or te h support forums trust me, I've tried. Using DDU to install, changing the power profile to maximum performance, disable shader cache, you name it I've tried it. I'm fairly certain this is an issue with the Nvidia drivers (as it doesn't seem to affect the computer for the drivers older than version 580).. I seen someone on a different site that had this issue with an rtx 3050 so I don't think it's limited to the gpu's I've had.. someone else has to have had this issue and hopefully fixed it so they can use the newest drivers..

Back in the day, it was very common for sitcoms to have 12-24 episodes per season. With the advent of streaming, budgets only grow, literally every plot point seems "rehashed", nowadays a "season" seems to last 8 episodes at the most.. with the time between seasons measuring in years now.

I never thought I'd say this.. but modern shows could learn a thing or two from "soap operas" of old. Obviously their content wasn't "top shelf".. but at least they had content.. like clockwork every day of the week. While I'm not suggesting that content should be low quality soap opera level, the fact is is that streaming requires daily new content and people will get into any story.. even if it's "bad" or "ridiculous" as long as it's consistent and endearing. I propose streaming services start doing shows that have a very demanding filming schedule for 3-6 months of the year that hopefully produces 30-60 episodes per season.. using relatively unknown actors but with a production crew that's very "big picture oriented"

If each streaming service has 2-3 of these shows and just revolved between them per year, even if some of the episodes "aren't great" it'll still be better than waiting 3 years on 8 episodes of a show that has an inflated budget, aged cast, and incoherent and/revised storyline.. (does anyone honestly think the 3-4 years between seasons actually helped shows like stranger things?)