u/NotmyLobby

For those of you who handle criminal cases and Mental Health Court, I'm curious about your general approach to competency.

If a client has diagnoses such as PTSD, bipolar disorder, anxiety, and major depressive disorder, and is already participating in Mental Health Court on an alleged offense like terroristic threats, what factors would lead you to request a competency evaluation?

Does being accepted into Mental Health Court usually mean competency has already been addressed, or is competency still something you evaluate independently throughout the case?

Also, if a client fully understands the charges, the court process, and the consequences but rejects what many would consider a favorable plea offer because they want to exercise their right to a trial, is that ever a reason to question competency, or is it generally viewed as a strategic decision rather than evidence of incompetence?

I'm asking about general practice and how public defenders typically approach these situations.

I have a samsung s25 and I want a samsung tablet that I can screen mirror my phone to it. Any suggestions on a tablet that does this ? Im on a budget

I have a portable monitor but the volume sucks on it

I recently passed the plumbing apprenticeship assessment and have my interview scheduled for tomorrow.

​

For those of you who have gone through the apprenticeship interview process, is there anything I should know going in? What kinds of questions do they usually ask, and what are they looking for in candidates?

​

I'm 32 years old and looking to start a long term career in the trades. I've been taking the process seriously and want to make the best impression possible.

​

Any advice, tips, or things you wish you knew before your interview would be appreciated

Defendant was originally offered deferred adjudication on a Texas Terroristic Threat case enhanced to a 3rd degree felony. Since then, the defendant has been transferred into Mental Health Court and has been fully compliant with treatment, medication, drug testing, and court supervision.

The facts are somewhat unique in that the words allegedly used were arguably not a direct threat, but the surrounding behavior raised concerns and was a significant factor in the charging decision.

For those who handle these cases, how often do you reconsider your position and move toward a more favorable resolution (PTI/diversion, dismissal, reduction, etc.) after seeing sustained compliance and stability in Mental Health Court? What factors typically influence that decision?

I just took the plumbing assessment for a union apprenticeship and honestly felt like it was pretty easy. They said the results will be available later today, so now I'm just waiting.

The one thing that's got me concerned is that the instructor mentioned that for every 6 people who apply, only 1 person gets accepted. I'm almost 33 years old and really want to get started on a long term career.

Client is charged with a 3rd degree felony Terroristic Threat in Texas. After reviewing the facts, my position is that the alleged statement likely does not meet the legal criteria of a true threat, although I agree it looks bad on its face.

The State offered deferred adjudication, which the client rejected due to concerns about future employment and the inability to obtain a true expunction. Since then, the case has been transferred to Mental Health Court.

The client has been compliant with treatment, supervision, and court conditions. We are currently building equity with the court and treatment team to see whether PTI/diversion may be available, as that would be a significantly better outcome for the client's long term prospects.

Has anyone had success getting a felony threat type case from Mental Health Court into PTI/diversion after deferred adjudication was initially rejected?

Texas felony case. The State offered deferred adjudication early on for a Terroristic Threat charge. The defendant declined, and the case was later transferred to Mental Health Court. Defense counsel is now attempting to secure pretrial intervention.

Without commenting on the specific facts, is it common for prosecutors to offer deferred adjudication early even when they believe they have a strong case? Or can an early offer sometimes reflect concerns about proving the charge at trial?

Interested in hearing from prosecutors and criminal defense attorneys.

I have a client who has been offered deferred adjudication multiple times and has consistently rejected it. The client has since been transferred into Mental Health Court. My current approach is to continue building mitigation and demonstrating compliance in hopes of obtaining a cleaner resolution, such as a pretrial intervention/diversion outcome, although the client has also expressed a desire to proceed to trial if necessary.

The charge is a terroristic threat case that was enhanced from a Class B misdemeanor to a third degree felony. The case appears to be heavily dependent on the surrounding circumstances and context of the alleged communication, and there are significant disputes regarding whether the alleged statements constitute a threat.

For those who regularly handle Mental Health Court cases:

•How often do you see prosecutors move beyond deferred adjudication and agree to diversion/PTI after a defendant rejects deferred?

•Does placement in Mental Health Court tend to create more opportunities for alternative resolutions in your experience?

•How do you balance pursuing a negotiated outcome while also preparing for trial when a client is firmly opposed to deferred adjudication?

Interested in hearing how others have handled similar situations.

I'm interested in understanding, in a general sense, how criminal defense attorneys view a client's compliance with court requirements, treatment programs, or specialty court programs when negotiating with prosecutors.

For example, when a client is facing a felony charge and has the option of deferred adjudication, how do attorneys assess whether a period of successful compliance and demonstrated progress might improve the likelihood of obtaining a pretrial intervention or diversion type resolution instead?

I'm not seeking advice about a specific case. I'm interested in the general factors attorneys consider when discussing the concept of "building equity" with a client and how that may affect negotiations and case outcomes.

I relapsed and did meth one time again while im on random drug testing for court. I did this 2 months ago and I got it out of my system on the 5th day luckily.....

how long does it stay in your urine ? And does drinking water help it get it out faster? I know i got a problem, just need any advice