Why don't the regions around Luxembourg profit more from their geographic location?
Luxembourg is in the centre of a triangle of three countries: Germany, France and Belgium.
The Grand Duchy is the richest state in the EU, so you'd expect the other regions to also see a lot of impact from such developments.
However, the neighbouring regions are all mostly doing badly:
- The Eifel region in Germany is a relatively poor region for Western German standards
- the Belgian Luxembourg province is the worst doing part of the already economically weak Wallonia
- the northern part of Lorraine is also not really having an economic boom. Sure, it's a bit better than the German and Belgian counterparts, but considering it has a big economy of it's own and should profit the most from it's proximity to Luxembourg (Thionville and Metz are really close and have decent infrastructure connecting them to Lux).
Why is that?
Is it because the economic structure of Luxembourg doesn't allow for such a thing to happen, or is it because local politicians can't see or use the opportunities?
I'd argue, for example, that the Eifel region would profit massively if it advertised itself as a go to region for Luxembourgers to live there and pay less for an appartment or house, but also do an initiative that expands existing cities to cater to Luxembourgers. Part of it is also a result of neglect from higher up, i think. For example, to this day there is no direct fast link between Cologne and Luxembourg, because the A1 motorway still isn't completed. Same goes for train connections.