u/Specialist_Hornet488

Please, if there's anything at all I can do to even just make the memory leak not as bad, I'll take it. The game is dropping to the worst settings quality and working its way back to my settings every thirty seconds. The game is so miserable and unplayable and I just need something that at least sort of works.

I like to discuss religion and I feel like when a theist asks "where does logic come from," it strikes me as more of a running tactic instead of a legitimate and interested question.

What logic itself is, is pretty fairly agreed on, even if the domain of influence is questioned by some people. Logic can basically be summed up to descriptive consistency; we recognize consistent things and we therefore call them logical. One plus one consistently equals two: logic. Greater mass consistently means greater attraction on other beings: logic. P -> Q consistently means -Q -> -P: logic.

What logic is, though, is irrelevant to where it comes from unless some necessary connection can be made proving its origin and the impossibility of its existence without that origin. And this is the biggest problem I've come across when discussing logic with many types of theists: if god exists, then god is a self-satisfying being. His existence justifies itself. Thus, if you sincerely believe that logic is grounded in god, whose existence justifies itself, then you don't need to actually "prove" logic's connection to god in any real sense. The atheist's interpretation of logic is completely irrelevant if god is real so there's absolutely no need to adopt it even for the sake of argument. And if the atheist can't justify where logic comes from, then the theist freely presumes that the atheist's failure means the theist's victory, and they are able to presume this because they still don't need to justify anything; god is still self-justifying, so logic's origins are still self-justifying.

Does this make sense? I'm sort of wondering if this just an annoyed, juvenile position on my part, or if it's a real phenomenon that other's agree on, and if anyone can give me any insight.

Hey, y'all

I live in college dorms and I hate having to make a walk all the way to the kitchen with everything I need to cook a meal, and then walking all the way back with both a cooked meal and everything I used to make it. I also frequently don't feel much like cooking anyways.

I have an air fryer, a rice cooker/vegetable steamer, and a microwave. I doubt the microwave will ever be useful for anything except reheating leftovers, but still.

What are some meals I can make with just the two (or just one)?

Title. I cannot figure it out. It's nowhere in StarRez. How do I get one???

Or, rather, logical things are true regardless?

For example, "squares cannot simultaneously be circles" is logically true. This is true even if squares, circles, simultaneous-ness, and the situation as a whole is not comprehended, right? A monkey has one apple even if it doesn't understand what it means to "have" "one" "apple"?

I ask because I got into an argument with people who were trying to say that philosophy is useless, and part of that was them saying that logic is not a part of philosophy, which turned into whether or not logic exists regardless of comprehension.

I'm so sure that logic is logical regardless of if something comprehends.. logic. But their arguments were so unreasonable and threw me for such a loop that I feel like I need to ground myself.