u/Still-Goal-9314

It's a shame that Wilder didn't develop his left hand to be just as reliable or even as destructive as his right hand. Compared to other modern heavyweight punchers, Wilder's power seems to be exclusive towards his right cross/overhand. Never has he ever KOd someone using a left hook.

IDK why none of his trainers, particularly Breland, ever addressed this. Manny Pacquiao, who used to rely solely on his left straight, was able to develop his right hook (Manila Ice) into an asset in his arsenal. It's a shame that none of Wilder's team ever helped him develop a left hook to make him an even more destructive puncher. I doubt this is something that has much of a learning curve as the footwork he lacks.

https://preview.redd.it/4yfz0mslv82h1.png?width=299&format=png&auto=webp&s=29b82bab28102a00d2bf7737b666d0b40d6a526b

https://preview.redd.it/s0iv5qfov82h1.png?width=284&format=png&auto=webp&s=c6ee99e6157cfdab0211e1395c0b3b6786d1dd8b

Right now, I'm in the process of trying to gain an in-depth understanding of MS Excel, as well as how to use it in various cases - whether trying to collect data, building dashboards, and interpreting data results. Now the question is, should I try mastering Excel first before moving towards Power BI, or is it inconsequential?

Also, how exactly is Power BI needed when MS Excel in itself is capable of housing dashboards and charts?

Yes, I might get downvoted for this, but what exactly is the consequence if the voting privilege is reserved only to college graduates? What does this entail from a nation-building perspective and future government policies for the country. Much of the argument I hear from individuals tends to fall under legalism and a priori perspectives; that such a policy violates the tenets of democracy and promotes discrimination.

However, I have yet to see any comprehensive explanation on why it's such a bad idea. Won't this exclusivity lead to far more rational outcomes since educated individuals are likely to be able to exert more critical thinking? In my country, the masses are guilty of voting for celebrity politicians who have no credentials. Some of them even claimed that they voted for the celebrity because he's good-looking.

Note: Yes, some educated individuals also have questionable intellect sometimes, but let's face it, they are likely to be more rational.

Technically, it's not only from the US since my country pretty much mirrors America's justice system, but anyways. Does the Last Clear Chance Doctrine even make sense from a consequentialist standpoint? I know that it was made to disincentivize drivers from insisting on their right of way, thus preventing accidents and them running over non-traffic-law-compliant citizens, but the question is, who in their mind would even think of running over someone?

No, I'm not saying that people are inherently good, but who would want the hassle of seeing their car outright damaged after hitting a fellow vehicle or even a pedestrian? Also, I doubt the average person would ever think of trying to take someone off in the road. The way I see it, the doctrine has only done more harm than good since it promotes a dynamics where the liability falls under the compliant driver rather than the one who didn't follow the traffic rules.

I

Alright, I know this sounds stupid but hear me out. Do congenital amputees, aka individuals born with only one hand, have a dominant hand laterality in terms of motor/gross skills?

I know that they can only technically use one hand due to the absence of the other, but what are the chances that their laterality for the present hand is poor due to their brain wiring being in favor of the opposite side, which never materialized? For example, if Bill Gates - a notable lefty - were somewhat born without his left hand intact, would his laterality automatically shift to his right or would his performance in his right hand be poor relative to his left hand that never came about?

Other than Ani boy - who has the highest midichlorian count as shown in "The Phantom Menace" and supporting novels, as well as Yoda, who was referenced despite being powerful, below Ani's count - are there any sources from either legends or canon that show the midichlorians of other force users?

I keep on seeing other SW YouTubers claim that below Ani is Valkorion, then Luke, then Sidious onwards, though IDK if these are real or they're just pulling it out of their arse.

What is the best free Gen AI tool for large data hoarding/mining? I plan to create a data directory of video games from 2020 to 2026 and paste it into Excel, but when I used various free AIs, like Gemini, I realized that they're incapable of gathering several types of data at once and could only take up to around 50 games on a table.

What's more is that speaking to Gemini is like speaking to a demented grandma; when I ask for it to continue the list it proceeds to create a new table that doesn't follow the format that I've ordered it to follow initially. ChatGPT has limited chunks, while Deepseek sometimes misses out on the instructions.

Sidious, Valkorion, Kun, Krayt, and Caedus. The name of these 5 Sith Lords tend to come out in every discussion of who the most powerful Sith is in history. Now, which Jedi team of 5 members, across all eras, is capable of matching or beating these 5 OP Sith Lords

Note: One can use a light side user that may not necessarily be a Jedi. Also, all characters are in composite mode.

https://preview.redd.it/ijczljia9i1h1.png?width=225&format=png&auto=webp&s=56f84993cb49bf153df19f7b504c6cf828d5d46e

https://preview.redd.it/it7z8a3d9i1h1.png?width=300&format=png&auto=webp&s=917ccceabcce4a34f8e750398375712eaacf8503

https://preview.redd.it/x78i7grf9i1h1.png?width=290&format=png&auto=webp&s=9f1aefb46543ab16453384b03c9b89adae381214

https://preview.redd.it/hmkpk7ki9i1h1.png?width=220&format=png&auto=webp&s=04f4819a1babae00e7ff7cdcb99f24326b8e4369

https://preview.redd.it/mnggbgrk9i1h1.png?width=241&format=png&auto=webp&s=bcdb378891146545920cfe155cfe6af83e461224

So we do know the lore that the Daedric Princes ganged up on Jyggalag and cursed him to live as the Prince of Madness, Sheogorath; an antithesis to everything the Prince of Order stands for.

Despite being a nerfed version of Jyggalag, Sheo has bested other Princes in various contests, such as creating a familiar capable of overpowering Hircine's own, tricking Malacath into killing his own son, and outsmarting Vaermina on time. Now the princes seem to still see Sheo as less of a threat than Jyggy is, given that they don't seem to gang up on him anymore as his present Mad God version. If the Princes are willing to tolerate someone as unpredictable as Sheo, I can only wonder what abilities Jyggalag has to compel them to "off him."

https://preview.redd.it/dtqhr91f3i1h1.png?width=168&format=png&auto=webp&s=7a3e5809fee15ac6350d6cb6206471376e0590fe

https://preview.redd.it/f4i81a1f3i1h1.jpg?width=168&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e990f02cf576d4cccda80d945f545beb888ff50d

Whether it's during my university days or during my time now as a young employee, I am someone guilty of taking too long for my tasks. I've noticed that people around me are significantly faster when it comes to making power point presentations, creating spreadsheets, and making action plans. What's more is that sometimes I get too buried with tasks that I've exerted too much effort on, that I end up sunk-cost: refusing to pivot out of dismay that my effort has gone to waste.

Are there any methodologies or drills I can do to stop myself from stalling?

In this decade's heavyweight division, the likes of Wardley, Dubois, Joyce, Joshua, Zhang, and Wilder are pretty much known for their destructive punching power. The question is, how would you folks rank these heavies in terms of their raw punching force, and who do you think has the hardest punch among them?

On a related note, who is the best puncher among these men? Best puncher may not mean having the hardest punch, but being the best at scoring decisive blows and follow-throughs to score a knockout.

https://preview.redd.it/9nj2bncagb1h1.png?width=259&format=png&auto=webp&s=408e8e160f24d4f2184daa5bcc5b3ab8b554361c

https://preview.redd.it/qhwqgs6cgb1h1.png?width=300&format=png&auto=webp&s=e433140d5452c888888342700d632c8b92fc7306

https://preview.redd.it/kv8si07egb1h1.png?width=300&format=png&auto=webp&s=d5f77cffd2d718d2f7e74fe9f647bed8f1a417a8

No, no I'm not a creep. I am a freelance social media marketer hired to evaluate 3 Only Fans models' images and benchmark them against OnlyFans pictures that have the most retweets and bookmarks. Now, this agency wants me to analyze the visual elements that cause these OF pictures to be highly rated. I tried using Deepseek, GPT, Gemini, and Claude, but they would not let me attach the same images due to policy concerns.

I just want to finish the job and get my paycheck by next week.

Hello folks. I just landed a job in a socmed management role. My boss tasked me with evaluating three OF creators by benchmarking them against popular OF models' pictures.

My boss gave me a dataset that has these metrics in it - Likes, Reposts, and Impressions, Quotes, Retweets, Comments, Bookmarks - and wants me to use them as a basis. Meaning the OF creators with the highest likes, reposts, and impressions are going to be my basis. How exactly do I use these metrics, and what are they for? What's the most important metric in X, and which of those 3 should I prioritize (Twitter)

Hello folks. I just landed a job in a socmed management role. My boss tasked me with evaluating three OF creators by benchmarking them against popular OF models' pictures.

My boss gave me a dataset that has these metrics in it - Likes, Reposts, and Impressions, Quotes, Retweets, Comments, Bookmarks - and wants me to use them as a basis. Meaning the OF creators with the highest likes, reposts, and impressions are going to be my basis. How exactly do I use these metrics, and what are they for? What's the most important metric in X, and which of those 3 should I prioritize (Twitter)

Both game consoles are considered to be console war failures and a start of both Microsoft and Sega's decline in sales and video game reception. The question is, which had it worse? Are Xbox One's failures reminiscent of how Sega fumbled the bag in the mid to late 90s, or is that going too far?

These 2 heavyweights are known for their ferocious punching power that can nearly put opponents into a coma. Unfortunately, both fighters seem to be reliant on their destructive power, which ends up compromising their defense and knowledge other boxing toolkits. The question is, who is more one-dimensional among these 2 power punchers, and how would you compare their styles and weaknesses, chin, etc?

Game consoles such as PS5, Xbox Series X, and Switch 2 have backward compatibility integrated within their system. Now, what's the difference if I use a PS5 copy of a game, play it with a PS5, vs when I use a PS4 copy in the PS5? Is there a significant difference in how the console depicts them on screen?

I have certain discs of games in here that are from the previous generation, and I want to play them on my latest console. Is there a difference in resolution between the copies' generation, or is the resolution solely based on the hardware?

For context, I keep on hearing about how Wardley took significant damage from his fight with Dubois and physically, this may have already finished him as well as his professional career. Didn't other heavyweight boxers in history receive the same significant beating he had and bounce back for another couple of great fights?

George Foreman took several heavy blows from Lyle, Stewart, and Holyfield, yet no one claimed he was finished after those aforementioned matches. The sight of Holyfield getting floored by Moorer and getting severely knocked out by Bowe was just as terrifying, but he was still able to secure several more fights. Also, didn't old school HW boxers from the old era normally take just as much damage and still continue with their career. Unless there's a mythical ability that gives past heavyweights a chance to recover, I don't understand people who claim that the strikes he took from Dubois finished him.

https://preview.redd.it/l581447e1h0h1.png?width=275&format=png&auto=webp&s=22fb8ebeebc46099767782e4985cb05bda385d19

https://preview.redd.it/utlbteml1h0h1.jpg?width=182&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=fa3614638041899d96156b488bdd6553dc143807

https://preview.redd.it/f7rv20fz1h0h1.png?width=259&format=png&auto=webp&s=738cf5e6db38175669336317071c5d764cd1c121

Heya folks, I have been an avid Playstation fan and owner since the PS1 days, with my latest console being the PS4. Right now, I want to explore the competitor consoles for the heck of it and am currently on the fence on whether I should purchase an Xbox One or a Series X. Does Xbox One have games that Series X doesn't have in their backward compatibility database? Otherwise, I might purchase the Xbox One due to it being cheaper and theoretically having a larger game database due to its maturity.

Edit: On a related note, is it true that I can emulate all old games across various old consoles through the Xbox Series X? I'm a sucker for nostalgia, so this is a game changer for me!

Hello, I am currently an owner of every PlayStation, up to PS4. I want to experience the other side, whether it be the Xbox or Nintendo products. The question is, which would be a better bang for my buck? Picking Xbox One or Switch 1 since the game list for both is pretty much at its peak in terms of availability? Or should I opt for a Switch 2 or Series X since they're the latest consoles and may offer more compelling features?

I'm worried that the latest consoles may not have decent game availability since they're rather new. Also, would you guys recommend me to go for a Switch product or an Xbox product?