Irl there were battles with way more soldiers than can fit in hoi4 like kursk. Also changing combat width would solve the multi turreted tank meta issue and the artillery taking too much space issue (technically artillery should be combat width. There's a reason why irl quantity tanks worked well compared with few powerful ones and it's not represented at all in the game.
The dude scared me when he attacked when I was sending the savolax card, but in the end I won. These guys are strange cause I have so few of them but they are so powerful at the same time. And they cost 20% less than normal jaegers while slowing mine burnout, really nice card. Should I use the 700 wood card to buy savolax jaegers or to torp boom? I'm still not so sure if I should prioritize going fortress age and savolax, booming with torps or building a second attack after the first rush.
Is it safe to assume the guy uses the church rush strat? I am really interested in knowing what he builds
If your civ has a rush strat, always use it. People tend to try fast fortress that they have seen on internet without scouting , and even if they scout they don't use the info. If they don't fast fortress, usually they have some other slow strat without defenses, I won several matches with the guys just surrendering at 6 or 7 minutes cause they have nothing to stop my rush.
I never struggle to produce weapons or ammunition, the main bottleneck is then the cost to pay for it to put in the army. Why do we need hundreds of consumer goods factories but barely 10 wepon factories can equip hundreds of thousands of soldiers?
On one hand their late game units are amazing, on the other their economy becomes terrible since the torps dry up.
So i am a new player, very low elo, and I tried this strat (16 halbs+7 wittelsbach allies by 6:30) two times and won 2 times, once the dude surrendered at 7 mins because he had no defenses setup at all... sometimes I wonder if these aren't AIs because they have like 500ranked games played (I checked on free food party, shame on me), and yet they seem to build very slowly
Dutch scare me cause I'm pretty sure caroleans + leather canon/falconets lose to skirm goon, is my only hope to make jagers?
The obvious one is carolean + leather canon/falconet. I know about Pikes + leather canon and jager + hakkapelita. Are there other ones? How do they compare with each other?
How am I supposed to win in those circumstances, it's unfair. Will I have to lose 20 more games to reach a playable rank for me?
I remember that a cho gath could literally one shot some ADCs with feast in late game (with gargoyle active), but now every ADC seems to have like 2500 or 2700 health in late. I know the gargoyle helped a lot, but even with this item now the feat wouldn't be possible.
I'm not talking about weird zaunian stuff like what made doctor Mundo. I'm talking about Darius, Braum, K'sante and the few other insanely buff human characters. Braum's shield or K'sante's N'tofos must weight in the hundreds of kilograms, and yet they manage to move them around like a normal person would hold a frying pan/regular fighting sticks. K' sante's arms are literally bigger than most human champions' chest! So you're not gonna tell me he's natty.
I'm currently playing in emerald, and I have this problem of my botlanes to fall behind or feed more than half of the times, which statistically shouldn't be the case, so maybe I don't give them the help they need? Winning late game with a weak botlane is very difficult so I tend to lose those games, and I'd like to solve the issue. In late game it's not even worth it to peel them instead of attacking ennemy backline since they deal no damage anyway (in a few games I did as full tank malphite or full tank cho gath I did twice my adc's damage, which is kinda messed up). My laner rarely seems to do a lot to carry his botlane, and usually the diference starts before the end of the laning phase.
So I took states general became emperor of china and now I still get the elections and I have the statist vs monarchists mechanic.
My teacher says that they use a lot of graphite to improve neutron economy, but then if the reactor is overmoderated it makes the neutron economy worse. My guess is that when the reactor is at full power and most of the water is steam, the reactor actually becomes undermoderated and boiling any more water would reduce k_eff, hence why in TV shows they always say the reactor is unstable at low power. Did soviet engineers make an overmoderated reactor on purpose? because it seems to be a bad idea since it makes safety and effectiveness worse, so there's probably a catch that I don't understand/know about.
Also, why would they put graphite tips on control rods if the reactor was already overmoderated? wouldn't it just reduce even more the reactivity?
R5: it's almost 1700, I feel like I have been a bit slow. I could have been much faster if I formed sardinia piedmont for admin eff and italy for ccr and improve relations, but it would have made the challenge pointless (why not start as savoy ar saluzzo if I'm going for sardinia piedmont lol). Could probably still go for WC now that I have 1.5M soldiers, 2000 ducats per months and finally good ideas.
I played trynda again after a long time, and unless a team with few cc. mobility and only squishes it feels super weak. Every time my ennemy build palted steelcaps and mini thornmail and I do no damage. I feel like I am an adc but with no range and that gets kited. Can't even 1v1 trundle or garen past steelcaps. For me trynda just feels like a weaker trundle
Personally I expand fast enough that I can't have every building slot filled in every province by 1600. I know that I don't need that and I often play without military or economic ideas early on on normal difficulty. But on very hard or with xorme AI I feel like I kinda need to build up my country and have decent military capabilities, especially with xorme where AI often have insane numbers with optimized idea groups for military. Many people say money is easy in this game, but are they like not building their country or expanding fast enough? Or do they just get loans to build military and expand like that all game around?
Since mortal reminder gives roughly equivalent stats as serylda and grievous wound, I usually pick it instead, and I don't mind the 25% crit chance. However I see this item recommended by noone, but then should I pick the chemsword for the anti heal, or just the grievous wound 800gold item and keep it till late game?
Hello,
so I have had pc crashes randomly, even on no load (browsing internet, being on desktop) for a few years (I think since when I changed my gtx 1060 3gb for an rtx 3070). These crashes were pretty rare for a long time (once or twice a week maybe), I tried to solve them but didn't succeed, so I decided that it wasn't so bad since it didn't happen too often. However these last 2 weeks I have had several crashes each day. It always make some weird black screen with horizontal white and coloured lines and then restarts my computer. The reliability history and Windbg say it is error 13a KERNEL_MODE_HEAP_CORRUPTION.
My specs are:
MOBO: Asus Tuf gaming B650 plus wifi
GPU: rtx 3070
CPU: ryzen 7800x3d
RAM: 2x16gb corsair vengeance 6000MHz DDR5
Some PSU with 750 or 850W power outpu (don't remember exactly which one, it's from corsair, but I picked one with like 200W too much for my config anyways and it didn't make issues when I had my older config, so I don't think it's the issue)
Windows: 11
What I have tried to fix it yet:
deactivate PBO and EXPO in my BIOS
install latest BIOS
test both sticks of RAM individually (only one plugged at a time)
clean GPU drivers reinstall with DDU
Remove the GPU
So far, none of these worked
What should I do now? I heard I could try to reinstall windows, but I wonder if the problem really comes from that