Clarification on my problems with the Caucasian Archer, and an apology for my conduct.
I am sorry for how I conducted myself during this, after sleeping on this for a bit, I realize that for how annoyed I felt during all of the "but the Armenians already have 3rd class archers: Caucasian Archers!" I don't think I really took enough time to properly explain the issues I have with them, and for that, I am sorry, too, as I should've taken more care into giving you a properly structured argument. I realize now that I probably did come off as fairly demanding and maybe a little bit rude, but I'm going to try to correct that in as succinct and extensive way as possible so that any confusion would be cleared up on this. I will also try to address all of the arguments that everyone else had brought up to me.
The naming terminology is honestly my biggest issue with this, every archer unit on the entire map has either their own specific archers unique to them, like the Cretans or Rhodians, or have their own culturally generic ones, Greek, Thracian, Celtic, Germanic, etc. This goes for all the ranged units, also, except for Armenia's 3rd class archers. The Spartans have helots and Skiritai, but those are clearly their slaves and one of their most historically powerful allies, the Epirotes have Akarnanian Slingers, who were one of the Greek tribes that made up their kingdom, these "uniques" as a Civ player would call them are clearly their own people or very closely aligned.
Now, instead of being named after themselves, the Caucasians are the only ones filling that role of 3rd class archer, as if they're completely favoring Caucasian mercenaries over the bowmen in the rest of their domain. It makes it look like favoritism for foreigners in a culture that absolutely would've had their own lower class bowmen able to serve! Their name in combination with their unit description only stating that their origin is "Hardy men levied from the Caucasus" makes it look like they're not Armenians living in the lands they hold in the mountains, but are Caucasians themselves, foreigners, and I just don't think it plausible that an Eastern Faction wouldn't have their own peasant archers that they could call to war, I mean, the bow and arrow is an indespensible part of the Easterner's kit both historically and the game. No other unit in their roster that explains where they came from specifically names the Caucasus, other than the Caucasian Spearmen.
Armenian Highlanders: "Fierce warriors from the Armenian highlands..."
Armenian Javelinmen: "Levied from the hamlets and villages across the Armenian steppe..."
Armenian Skirmisher Cavalry: "...well suited to the mountainous home of the Armenians"
Armenian Horse Archers: "Armenia, despite its rugged geography, is a land of rich meadows and is able to support cavalry in great numbers"
Who are they supposed to be? Are they Armenian Archers levied from the Caucasus or Caucasians taking up the bow for a foreign king? Going by the logic of the Caucasian Spearmen then I believe it's only natural to assume the latter and question the "absence" of a "native" Armenian Archer unit from the roster. This apparent "gap" becomes all the more jarring when the Heavy Archer is taken into consideration, as these guys are unquestionably native.
As for the argument that the Armenians were "technically" Caucasian or that they were primarily a Caucasian people, no, they weren't, the both of them were their own unique peoples and were sister nations, and while their influence certainly extended into the Caucasus, if anything the Caucasians could be considered an extension and culturally continuous with the Urartan Kingdom which both they and the Armenians descended from. The vast majority of the Armenian's own homeland was the Easternmost Hills, Steppe, and meadows of Anatolia to the West of the region, they were neighbors to a lot more Anatolians than they were Caucasians, their subjects for starters, the Sophenes, Lesser Armenians, and Kardukoi, as well as the Medians. The two lands and two peoples are distinct enough for both to have their own units and aesthetics.
I believe I've explained every problem I have with this unit as succinctly and fairly as possible, and I want to take the opportunity to, again, apologize for any misbehavior on my part during this incident. @Kam, I am sorry for saying that the answers you were given me were annoying, but you did respond to multiples of my comments with that exact same answer, which doesn't excuse my part in this, I'm just explaining why I felt annoyed. And I am sorry for the needless drama this has caused.
Except for that guy who accused me of trolling, seriously, I may not have behaved the best, but I will not tolerate people saying I'm coming from a place of insincerity or mockery with this sub when I have been nothing but earnest and genuine even if my conduct was bad.
EDIT: Why are Schizos downvoting my post? I explain my issue succinctly and with clear language, apologize for my misconduct and this is my reception? God it's like people here are allergic to sincerity, do the people downvoting even post or interact with the community here?