u/Vansh804009

So i was thinking that, in an examination, we often assume that getting rank 1 is the hardest.

But, many times the person who got rank 1 is not only relatively the best, but also closer to best on an absolute level. So if someone strives towards being the absolute best then they can achieve rank 1.

But now lets say a person wants a specific rank, lets say 22nd, and he wants to be as close as possible(say margin of +-2). Now he needs to be relatively worser than 21 candidates and relatively better than the rest. This is different from targetting being absolute best as in case of rank 1. So it appears, targetting and getting this rank is harder than rank 1.

I want to understand, how can i mathematically approach this? Take and suggest any assumptions or parameters. Also, if we do quantify it can we get a threshold and thus the rank which is hardest to obtain which may fall below 1?

This problem isnt for undermining the importance of rank 1, because most people target rank 1 as they sit in an exam rather than having a specific numeral target other than 1.

Johnny cakes, a man who cooks, turns out to be gay.

Ralph cifferato a man who cooks turns out to be a submissive guy.

So in mind of chase only a man who makes BBQ in his garden can be an alpha male.

Dude doesnt even spectulates, he straight up says it as a confirmation, no benefits of doubt, straight up the negative thing as assumption.

This was also the guy laughing at miz being better than punk on mic for some reason(along with the other guy)

Like is he telling us his experience in bed? Or is he telling us how he got there?

I am sick and tired of wrestlers making a mockery of this buisness.

Anyway, TNA is my favourite wrestling company.

Oba v Brock on night 1, oba vs Roman on night 2. Everyone started parroting this after bully ray and at times not even mentioning him at it lol.

Now triple h doesn't follow it? Wdym you can have 4 big stars on the PLE instead of 3 with better builds by not following this? I don't care how buisness works.

I was temp banned 2 days ago, i appealed the decision and they revoked the ban, finding that my comment is clear. But i got to know about some CQS system? which apparently means that the automod will flag the user after an offense? are my posts getting removed under this only? But if they found my comment to be okay and revoked it, they should unflag me from the system as well? I cant even contact them regarding this because the contact form has no subject regarding this.

Can someone help me regarding this?

I know i know this is a repeated topic, but there is this one thing that i dont understand, i have heard many times in video essays as well that AEW and Tony Khan were wrong in letting CM Punk Go. Its alright if we are only discussing it from a buisness standpoint, but they label it as some personal failure on tony's part.

When i first got to know of it, i thought that he took a brave decision. He knew punk was the biggest draw but chose jack perry and elite over them, although it wasnt such a black and white decision, punk gave some advice as a veteran, perry was an asshole to shoot on him on tv but that was the culture of AEW and punk wasnt a part of creative.

He first landed his hands on perry, choking him, i mean punk was more in the wrong here to lay his hands on a performer just before a show. Tony gave him even a seperate show respecting his differences with the elite, despite that he did that stuff.

Tony rewarded perry and elite for their loyalty, i mean they gave their all to aew, punk came in way after and tbh punishing the bigger star for their mistake is not seen much in the buisness but tony khan did that.

In kayfabe, considering the CM Punk character, who is anti establishment, this also fits? Like a booker favouring the talented younger guy than the veteran who was in the wrong.

Please let me know if i am misunderstanding something.

Is it true? Fan footage provides evidence for the same.

Nelson mandela? Whatever happened there..

Did the same happened with the sopranos? Any dialouge the fans popularized only to find out it doesnt exist and was differently spoken? Any timeline got fucked up moments fans remember differently?

As in they wanted him dead or wanted him recorded in the "act"? I hope the computers come in handy to answer this.

Remember the conversation after Janice finds out the state of livia's house? She goes to Carmella and questions her parenting on just punishing her by having "her credit card withdrawn for 3 weeks" and says "If this was my child.." , she also says that meadow will be out of her hands or smth

And she proved herself right, look at what she did to Bobby's little girl, so caged,no freedom, listening to every command she gives, almost opposite of meadow who is high spirited, free and revolting.

I didnt eat momo(/s) until this year, and when i did i found it..tasteless. Like momo(/s) have no taste and only the chutney served has the taste, part of it may be because its served hot, but genuinenly is that it? Like i have eaten it thrice but still dont get the hype.