
When the newsletter drops...
and you're forced to consider the crippling weight of debt vs the weight of fine tartan threads upon your shoulders...

and you're forced to consider the crippling weight of debt vs the weight of fine tartan threads upon your shoulders...
SmartBuyGlasses the only option or have you had success somewhere else?
My provider left my dr office, saw a new one yesterday. We only have one, there's no option (small town).
I have a diagnosis, from a qualified physician in a testing facility when I lived in a larger metropolitan area, I legitimately have adhd. This new nurse practitioner did the hour long "why can't you take deep breaths when unable to focus?" and "yoga helps with concentration" and gave me this sheet.
I am *concerned* this is the shit rfk is pushing, in addition to less meds in our meds. Like we're collectively being weaned off of it. In which case I will lose my job, without a doubt. Fuck.
(What the fuck is a skibidi?)
Big thank you to whomever alerted us to the "as is" sale on QVC. I was able to grab these before they were gone; 4 out of 5 arrived in original packaging, all were in perfect shape.
AI DATA CENTERS AND OREGON’S POWER GRID: IMPACT, POLICY RESPONSE, AND WHAT RESIDENTS CAN DO A data-and-reference-based briefing
BACKGROUND
As AI infrastructure investment surges across the United States, Oregon has emerged as one of the most concrete case studies of how a state grid absorbs - and pushes back against - the costs of hyperscale data center growth. This compiles two specific questions about Oregon’s situation, along with the data, policy actions, and citizen-engagement pathways relevant to each.
QUESTION 1: “What will be the impact on state of Oregon?”
THE BACKDROP
Oregon currently hosts more than 120 data centers, concentrated heavily around Hillsboro and The Dalles, home to major facilities operated by companies including Google and Amazon. (Source: OPB, May 12, 2026)
The cost of that growth has been landing on ordinary ratepayers:
THE POLICY RESPONSE: THE POWER ACT
In 2025, the Oregon Legislature passed House Bill 3546, known as the POWER Act (“Protecting Oregonians With Energy Responsibility”), with bipartisan support. The law:
IMPLEMENTATION: THE MAY 2026 PUC ORDER
The Oregon Public Utility Commission (PUC) issued its first POWER Act implementation order on May 5, 2026, establishing a new rate classification for large data centers in PGE territory, known as “Schedule 96.” Key provisions:
THE ACTUAL RATE CHANGES (effective June 10, 2026)
| Customer class | Rate change |
|---|---|
| Large-load data center customers | +29% energy costs |
| Residential customers | -1.3% |
| Small business customers | -3.7% |
(Source: PGE filing, reported by Data Center Dynamics)
At least 16 data centers were immediately affected by the new rate structure.
INDUSTRY PUSHBACK
The Data Center Coalition, representing 42 data center owners and operators nationally, criticized the Oregon framework as “out of step” with other states, calling it the most extreme protective mechanism its VP of energy had seen in any jurisdiction. Industry representatives say they support fair cost allocation but objected to the scale of Oregon’s guardrails.
WHAT’S STILL PENDING
Pacific Power, Oregon’s other major investor-owned utility, has its own data center cost proceeding underway at the PUC, with a decision expected November 2026. This is the next major test of whether the POWER Act framework holds across the state’s full utility footprint.
QUESTION 2: “What can Oregon residents do to ensure that data centers do not lobby to kill such bills or laws, or change them to reduce their costs?”
THIS ISN’T HYPOTHETICAL - IT’S ALREADY HAPPENING
Before the May 2026 order was finalized, CUB publicly accused PGE of attempting to circumvent the POWER Act through a rate-filing mechanism called the “Peak Growth Modifier.” CUB argued this proposal would have shifted 34-45% of new infrastructure costs back onto residential customers, despite data centers being the primary driver of that growth. CUB cited a concrete example: PGE built two substations in Washington County, costing $174 million, that serve zero residential customers - yet PGE’s proposed methodology would have assigned 47% of that cost to residential ratepayers. The PUC ultimately sided with consumer advocates in its May 2026 order.
The lesson: the most realistic near-term threat to laws like this isn’t outright repeal - it’s incremental erosion through technical rate-case filings that most residents never see. The countermeasure is the same one that already worked once: organized, legally-standing advocacy that monitors these filings closely.
CONCRETE ACTIONS FOR OREGON RESIDENTS
SOURCES
Additional reference links:
This reflects publicly reported information as of June 2026. Pacific Power’s proceeding outcome (expected November 2026) and the Data Center Advisory Committee’s report (due October 2026) will materially affect this picture going forward.
The last vote will be decided by a poll, rather than a comment. The state with the least votes will be deleted. Vote Cascadia!
Not finding much at all about Emile Belet, other than this gorgeous Underwater Sealife series. Is anyone else familiar?