u/konfitura17

First of all, I want to thank all the Fiora mains who responded to my last post it was really interesting reading your opinion. Now I’ve got a question for Camille mains. I’m a Riven main Gold/Plat elo, and I’ve been hearing a lot of people say that Camille is currently in a really weak spot. I also remember Drututt saying she’s basically dead or just very weak right now. I don’t play Camille myself, so I’m curious what exactly is causing this. Is it her laning phase, items, matchups, or something else? I also have to say I kinda miss fighting against her, she always felt like a really interesting and skill based matchup. I’d love to hear your thoughts, especially from people who have been maining Camille for a long time

Riot announced league Classic and I’m wondering if anyone is going to play it. I’ve never played the old seasons, so I don’t really know what to expect. I’m curious if it will feel like a completely different game or just an older version of League. It would be cool to try it, especially since I heard Riven was really strong back then. She was added at the end of Season 1, so she still counts as part of that early League era. It would be nice to see the old animations and the original feel of the game. What do you think? Is it worth going back to that version or not?

Hey guys, I’ve been playing a lot of ranked lately, and I’ve noticed I almost never see Fiora any more. I’m a Riven main myself, so I really enjoy skill matchups, and that’s why I kinda miss her on top lane. Fiora has always felt like one of the most skill-expressive matchups in the game and it used to be really fun to play against her. I’m in Gold/Plat elo, and this season I’ve only faced Fiora like 7 times total, and that’s it other than that she basically doesn’t exist in my games. I’m wondering if it’s just my MMR/elo or if something changed and people just stopped picking her that much

I recently came across this artwork of Ned Stark and started wondering how well it matches how people actually imagine him from the books. I saw a similar post before with an illustration of Tyrion Lannister, and it’s hard not to agree, it’s really difficult to find good book accurate fanart of Tyrion, because most artists tend to make him look much more attractive than he’s described in the books.

I also really like art eddard stark by Amok https://awoiaf.westeros.org/index.php/Eddard_Stark

Since the Venator was introduced, I’ve noticed that the Imperial class Star Destroyer has increasingly been looked down on and treated as a “worse” ship. People often say it’s ugly, outdated, or that the Empire doesn’t know how to design ships. Honestly, I don’t really agree with that. The Venator is a great carrier and works very well in a fighter support role, but it’s a completely different type of ship built for a different doctrine. The Imperial was never meant to be a carrier it’s a line warship designed to dominate battles, win direct engagements, and project power through heavy firepower and presence. It’s not just a combat vessel, but also a symbol of the Empire’s strengthen.I feel like these two ships are often compared in a way that doesn’t really make sense, because they serve different purposes. The Venator isn’t “better” it’s just different. And the Imperial isn’t “worse” it’s simply designed for a different rolę. That’s why I think the Imperial class Star Destroyer deserves more respect than it usually gets in comparisons with the Venator

Hey! I’m starting a roleplay game with my friends, and right now I’m trying to figure out what the differences are between these ships, what each of them is used for, and which ones are actually the best in practice. I’m also curious why the Empire created multiple variants instead of just one universal ship. Also, which would be the best ship in a post-Empire setting? If anyone knows about this, I’d really appreciate an explanation.

1 Photo Vindictor

2 Photo Enforcer

3 Photo Immobilizer 418

You've just been appointed by Ardus Kaine as Chief of the General Staff of the Pentastar Alignment. Your job is to build a fleet capable of defending Alignment space from rival warlords, keeping the New Republic at bay, and doing all of that without bankrupting the state or stretching logistics beyond their limits. What kind of fleet would you build Would you rely on large capital ships like ISD as the backbone of the navy, or focus on smaller and more mobile task forces? How important would carriers and starfighters be compared to raw firepower? Would you invest in a few powerful fleets or spread your forces across multiple Sector? Most importantly, what do you think the Pentastar Alignment actually needed to survive after Endor and outlast the other Imperial successors? Curious to hear your fleet ideas, doctrines, and overall strategies

It feels like the Imperial I and II class Star Destroyer stopped being very effective after Endor. Before, it worked because the Empire controlled entire systems and could force enemies to fight on its terms. But after the collapse of the Empire and clashes with the New Republic, warfare became faster and more scattered. In that kind of environment, ISDs feel slow, expensive, and easy to avoid, which reduces their advantage a lot. So what kind of ship would actually be better for a post-Empire force? Something smaller, cheaper, and more mobile, working in groups instead of relying on one massive floating fortress? Was the ISD already outdated at that point, or could it still have been effective with the right tactics?

I’m curious what you all think. If Riven got a skin from one of the music skinlines, which band do you think she would fit best in?

Pentakill, K/DA, Heartsteel, True Damage or something completely different?

And also, which of these music skinlines is your favorite? I’d like to hear your picks and why you think so.

I’m curious about your opinions. Which Imperial ships do you think no longer made sense, were poorly designed, outdated, or simply didn’t perform their intended role as well as they should have? If you could redesign the Imperial fleet, which ships would you phase out, what would you replace them with, and which Clone Wars era ships would you bring back? For the sake of discussion, let’s assume Tarkin has only a limited influence on ship design and naval doctrine, so we focus more on strategic, logistical, and practical considerations. Should the Empire have continued developing some Republic-era designs like the Venator, Acclamator, Arquitens, or Victory instead of focusing almost entirely on massive Star Destroyers and super projects? Or were some Clone Wars ships already obsolete and better left discontinued? In my opinion, the Acclamator should have been brought back into service. It was primarily designed as a troop transport assault ship, capable of rapidly deploying large ground forces, while still carrying enough weaponry to defend itself in standard fleet engagements

In my opinion, 92 fits the Venator’s role as an assault carrier much better and also fits Republic doctrine more. 420 sounds impressive, but when you actually think about it, it creates a lot of problems. You’re not just storing starfighters. You also need room for fuel, ammo, spare parts, maintenance areas, pilots, technicians, and all the logistics needed to keep hundreds of fighters combat-ready. Also, I can’t think of many ships in either Canon or Legends that carry numbers that high while being similar to the Venator. 420 fighters is an enormous amount. I also don’t really see it fitting the Republic’s doctrine. The Republic fought with fleets of multiple Venators working together, not single ships throwing out massive fighter spam. That was closer to the Separatist style relying on numbers and mass production. The Republic was usually portrayed as relying more on better pilots, coordination, flexibility, and higher quality forces. I know there’s an argument that 420 fighters would make sense because the Republic needed to fight the Separatists’ numerical advantage, and I’ve seen discussions making that point. I understand the idea, but I’m not fully convinced. If the Republic’s answer was just “bring even more fighters,” it starts blurring the difference between Republic and Separatist doctrine. Honestly, 92 just feels more believable, scales better with the ship itself, and matches the way the Republic fought the war. My personal theory is that the 420 number might simply come from an author or editor who didn’t fully think through the scale, or maybe it was just a mistake that later got repeated. What do you think 92 or 420?

Hey Guys, I’ve been wondering why Riven players still mostly stick to top lane as her default role, when mid lane might actually solve a lot of her issue. Top lane is currently heavily dominated by ranged and tanks stacking armor and health, and Riven struggles a lot into that. She has no built in armor penetration, no true damage, no % HP damage, no AP scaling, and no Sustain based tank shredding. This makes extended fights into Tank heavy top laners feel pretty rough unless you get ahead early. Meanwhile, mid lane is filled with squishier champions, more roam opportunities, and less pure armor stacking. In theory, this should line up much better with Riven’s kit she excels at burst, skirmishes, and mobility rather than front-to-back tank fights. So my question is: why is Riven still considered a “top lane default” champion when mid lane seems to remove a lot of her worst matchups and plays more into her strengths?
Is it just tradition, wave control, or are there deeper reasons I’m missing?​

Hey Guys, I’m looking for funny and unusual Riven builds for Draft, more for fun than tryhard. Do you have any suggestions? ​(Top, Mid, jg)

Edit: thank you very much for your answers