u/stereomatch

NOTE: please discuss the recommendations below with your doctor

 

I would like to add a note on the skepticism in the mainstream media and among mainstream doctors for IVM (the "horse dewormer" drug - Ivermectin)

While it is true that IVM is not a one drug immediate solution for long haulers or post-vax issues

It should be noted that the signal is there for why it should be part of every protocol

 

There are many signals for it's efficacy that early treatment doctors have observed - I have observed it's post-exposure prophylaxis efficacy in households with index cases during the Delta variant - without the prophylaxis the whole household would fall sick - with it, the cases would be restricted to the index cases

 

However there is one place where it single-handedly shows efficacy is post-COVID19 anosmia/Parosmia (ie taste/smell dysfunction - which affects 1/5 to 1/10 COVID19 cases)

This is why I have been suggesting to early treatment doctors (like the FLCCC/IMA) that anosmia is a good way to present IVM - but most of the effort to normalize IVM use has been in arguing for mortality benefit etc

While anosmia remains an easily verifiable metric - within a few days and a few successive cases, a doctor will build up the confidence that this drug does have activity

 

So far I have seen 100% efficacy in all the recent anosmia cases I have seen - which have been 13-14 anosmia cases (this has been from a pool of 100+ COVID-19 cases)

The most recent anosmia (rarer now) reversal was a couple of months ago - 2 weeks of fatigue and anosmia after a minor case of "flu"/covid19

I told her it should reverse within 2 days and should see some relief in the fatigue (having seen this pattern repeat predictably in all previous cases)

And after 1-2 days she was at 100% smell

And cooked for the first time in 2 weeks - ie fatigue was gone

 

And in the months old cases - also I have seen 100% efficacy - with a longer treatment protocol - in the 3-4 cases I have seen

(though I concede this is not enough data and doesn't cover years old cases)

The pattern generally is that for old cases - more than 1 cycle may be needed - so for example 5 days of IVM 0.4mg/kg - split into morning/evening dose - taken with fatty meal or meal

Then can take a 3 day break - if want to avoid any visual disturbance side effects

Then take another 5 day course

Usually I would ask them to increase their Vitamin D levels as well

 

So just from this information, I feel that IVM should be first drug of choice as part of any protocol

Because of it's efficacy against post-COVID19 anosmia (which is a hard problem)

 

In my experience IVM also has been effective in removing fatigue as well for recent post-COVID19 cases - and in some old cases - both long haulers and post-vax

So it should be part of the protocols

 

Also because of the media paranoia created around IVM as some sort of litmus test for sanity or irrationality - I am unsure if the people who "try" IVM actually have used it for more than a few days

Since it is a relatively safe drug - it can be taken for 5 days - take a 3 day break (if you want to avoid the visual disturbances side effect) - and repeated

So my question is how many long haulers are actually trying longer term IVM use as part of their wider protocol

Instead of trying it for 5 days then writing it off

 

Summary: IVM shows single-drug response for some post-COVID19 persistent side effects like anosmia/Parosmia - which have no other comparable treatments (Stellate Ganglion Block SGB comes in a distant second - smell restraining which is the standard of care is not even partly effective) - which alone makes it an essential component to consider for protocols for long haulers - IVM hesitancy may also contribute to shorter duration use (when the drug can be easily tolerated with repeated dosing with breaks)

 

For more information on post-COVID19 anosmia, you can visit:

r/covid19anosmia

r/ivermectin

 

You would think this information would be welcomed on sub-reddits like:

r/covidlonghaulers

r/anosmia

r/Parosmia

But you would be mistaken - as these - and many of the mainstream sub-reddits - as policy - will perma-ban you if you suggest Ivermectin does anything for COVID-19

Recall that during the pandemic, YouTube actually had Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine mentioned by name in the YouTube terms of service - as unbelievable an overreach as that may seem, that was the state of affairs during the pandemic

NOTE: please discuss the recommendations below with your doctor

 

I would like to add a note on the skepticism in the mainstream media and among mainstream doctors for IVM (the "horse dewormer" drug - Ivermectin)

While it is true that IVM is not a one drug immediate solution for long haulers or post-vax issues

It should be noted that the signal is there for why it should be part of every protocol

 

There are many signals for it's efficacy that early treatment doctors have observed - I have observed it's post-exposure prophylaxis efficacy in households with index cases during the Delta variant - without the prophylaxis the whole household would fall sick - with it, the cases would be restricted to the index cases

 

However there is one place where it single-handedly shows efficacy is post-COVID19 anosmia/Parosmia (ie taste/smell dysfunction - which affects 1/5 to 1/10 COVID19 cases)

This is why I have been suggesting to early treatment doctors (like the FLCCC/IMA) that anosmia is a good way to present IVM - but most of the effort to normalize IVM use has been in arguing for mortality benefit etc

While anosmia remains an easily verifiable metric - within a few days and a few successive cases, a doctor will build up the confidence that this drug does have activity

 

So far I have seen 100% efficacy in all the recent anosmia cases I have seen - which have been 13-14 anosmia cases (this has been from a pool of 100+ COVID-19 cases)

The most recent anosmia (rarer now) reversal was a couple of months ago - 2 weeks of fatigue and anosmia after a minor case of "flu"/covid19

I told her it should reverse within 2 days and should see some relief in the fatigue (having seen this pattern repeat predictably in all previous cases)

And after 1-2 days she was at 100% smell

And cooked for the first time in 2 weeks - ie fatigue was gone

 

And in the months old cases - also I have seen 100% efficacy - with a longer treatment protocol - in the 3-4 cases I have seen

(though I concede this is not enough data and doesn't cover years old cases)

The pattern generally is that for old cases - more than 1 cycle may be needed - so for example 5 days of IVM 0.4mg/kg - split into morning/evening dose - taken with fatty meal or meal

Then can take a 3 day break - if want to avoid any visual disturbance side effects

Then take another 5 day course

Usually I would ask them to increase their Vitamin D levels as well

 

So just from this information, I feel that IVM should be first drug of choice as part of any protocol

Because of it's efficacy against post-COVID19 anosmia (which is a hard problem)

 

In my experience IVM also has been effective in removing fatigue as well for recent post-COVID19 cases - and in some old cases - both long haulers and post-vax

So it should be part of the protocols

 

Also because of the media paranoia created around IVM as some sort of litmus test for sanity or irrationality - I am unsure if the people who "try" IVM actually have used it for more than a few days

Since it is a relatively safe drug - it can be taken for 5 days - take a 3 day break (if you want to avoid the visual disturbances side effect) - and repeated

So my question is how many long haulers are actually trying longer term IVM use as part of their wider protocol

Instead of trying it for 5 days then writing it off

 

Summary: IVM shows single-drug response for some post-COVID19 persistent side effects like anosmia/Parosmia - which have no other comparable treatments (Stellate Ganglion Block SGB comes in a distant second - smell restraining which is the standard of care is not even partly effective) - which alone makes it an essential component to consider for protocols for long haulers - IVM hesitancy may also contribute to shorter duration use (when the drug can be easily tolerated with repeated dosing with breaks)

 

For more information on post-COVID19 anosmia, you can visit:

r/covid19anosmia

r/ivermectin

 

You would think this information would be welcomed on sub-reddits like:

r/covidlonghaulers

r/anosmia

r/Parosmia

But you would be mistaken - as these - and many of the mainstream sub-reddits - as policy - will perma-ban you if you suggest Ivermectin does anything for COVID-19

Recall that during the pandemic, YouTube actually had Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine mentioned by name in the YouTube terms of service - as unbelievable an overreach as that may seem, that was the state of affairs during the pandemic

NOTE: please discuss the recommendations below with your doctor

 

I would like to add a note on the skepticism in the mainstream media and among mainstream doctors for IVM (the "horse dewormer" drug - Ivermectin)

While it is true that IVM is not a one drug immediate solution for long haulers or post-vax issues

It should be noted that the signal is there for why it should be part of every protocol

 

There are many signals for it's efficacy that early treatment doctors have observed - I have observed it's post-exposure prophylaxis efficacy in households with index cases during the Delta variant - without the prophylaxis the whole household would fall sick - with it, the cases would be restricted to the index cases

 

However there is one place where it single-handedly shows efficacy is post-COVID19 anosmia/Parosmia (ie taste/smell dysfunction - which affects 1/5 to 1/10 COVID19 cases)

This is why I have been suggesting to early treatment doctors (like the FLCCC/IMA) that anosmia is a good way to present IVM - but most of the effort to normalize IVM use has been in arguing for mortality benefit etc

While anosmia remains an easily verifiable metric - within a few days and a few successive cases, a doctor will build up the confidence that this drug does have activity

 

So far I have seen 100% efficacy in all the recent anosmia cases I have seen - which have been 13-14 anosmia cases (this has been from a pool of 100+ COVID-19 cases)

The most recent anosmia (rarer now) reversal was a couple of months ago - 2 weeks of fatigue and anosmia after a minor case of "flu"/covid19

I told her it should reverse within 2 days and should see some relief in the fatigue (having seen this pattern repeat predictably in all previous cases)

And after 1-2 days she was at 100% smell

And cooked for the first time in 2 weeks - ie fatigue was gone

 

And in the months old cases - also I have seen 100% efficacy - with a longer treatment protocol - in the 3-4 cases I have seen

(though I concede this is not enough data and doesn't cover years old cases)

The pattern generally is that for old cases - more than 1 cycle may be needed - so for example 5 days of IVM 0.4mg/kg - split into morning/evening dose - taken with fatty meal or meal

Then can take a 3 day break - if want to avoid any visual disturbance side effects

Then take another 5 day course

Usually I would ask them to increase their Vitamin D levels as well

 

So just from this information, I feel that IVM should be first drug of choice as part of any protocol

Because of it's efficacy against post-COVID19 anosmia (which is a hard problem)

 

In my experience IVM also has been effective in removing fatigue as well for recent post-COVID19 cases - and in some old cases - both long haulers and post-vax

So it should be part of the protocols

 

Also because of the media paranoia created around IVM as some sort of litmus test for sanity or irrationality - I am unsure if the people who "try" IVM actually have used it for more than a few days

Since it is a relatively safe drug - it can be taken for 5 days - take a 3 day break (if you want to avoid the visual disturbances side effect) - and repeated

So my question is how many long haulers are actually trying longer term IVM use as part of their wider protocol

Instead of trying it for 5 days then writing it off

 

Summary: IVM shows single-drug response for some post-COVID19 persistent side effects like anosmia/Parosmia - which have no other comparable treatments (Stellate Ganglion Block SGB comes in a distant second - smell restraining which is the standard of care is not even partly effective) - which alone makes it an essential component to consider for protocols for long haulers - IVM hesitancy may also contribute to shorter duration use (when the drug can be easily tolerated with repeated dosing with breaks)

 

For more information on post-COVID19 anosmia, you can visit:

r/covid19anosmia

r/ivermectin

 

You would think this information would be welcomed on sub-reddits like:

r/covidlonghaulers

r/anosmia

r/Parosmia

But you would be mistaken - as these - and many of the mainstream sub-reddits - as policy - will perma-ban you if you suggest Ivermectin does anything for COVID-19

Recall that during the pandemic, YouTube actually had Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine mentioned by name in the YouTube terms of service - as unbelievable an overreach as that may seem, that was the state of affairs during the pandemic

I would like to add a note on the skepticism in the mainstream media and among mainstream doctors for IVM (the "horse dewormer" drug - Ivermectin)

While it is true that IVM is not a one drug immediate solution for long haulers or post-vax issues

It should be noted that the signal is there for why it should be part of every protocol

 

There are many signals for it's efficacy that early treatment doctors have observed - I have observed it's post-exposure prophylaxis efficacy in households with index cases during the Delta variant - without the prophylaxis the whole household would fall sick - with it, the cases would be restricted to the index cases

 

However there is one place where it single-handedly shows efficacy is post-COVID19 anosmia/Parosmia (ie taste/smell dysfunction - which affects 1/5 to 1/10 COVID19 cases)

This is why I have been suggesting to early treatment doctors (like the FLCCC/IMA) that anosmia is a good way to present IVM - but most of the effort to normalize IVM use has been in arguing for mortality benefit etc

While anosmia remains an easily verifiable metric - within a few days and a few successive cases, a doctor will build up the confidence that this drug does have activity

 

So far I have seen 100% efficacy in all the recent anosmia cases I have seen - which have been 13-14 anosmia cases (this has been from a pool of 100+ COVID-19 cases)

The most recent anosmia (rarer now) reversal was a couple of months ago - 2 weeks of fatigue and anosmia after a minor case of "flu"/covid19

I told her it should reverse within 2 days and should see some relief in the fatigue (having seen this pattern repeat predictably in all previous cases)

And after 1-2 days she was at 100% smell

And cooked for the first time in 2 weeks - ie fatigue was gone

 

And in the months old cases - also I have seen 100% efficacy - with a longer treatment protocol - in the 3-4 cases I have seen

(though I concede this is not enough data and doesn't cover years old cases)

The pattern generally is that for old cases - more than 1 cycle may be needed - so for example 5 days of IVM 0.4mg/kg - split into morning/evening dose - taken with fatty meal or meal

Then can take a 3 day break - if want to avoid any visual disturbance side effects

Then take another 5 day course

Usually I would ask them to increase their Vitamin D levels as well

 

So just from this information, I feel that IVM should be first drug of choice as part of any protocol

Because of it's efficacy against post-COVID19 anosmia (which is a hard problem)

 

In my experience IVM also has been effective in removing fatigue as well for recent post-COVID19 cases - and in some old cases - both long haulers and post-vax

So it should be part of the protocols

 

Also because of the media paranoia created around IVM as some sort of litmus test for sanity or irrationality - I am unsure if the people who "try" IVM actually have used it for more than a few days

Since it is a relatively safe drug - it can be taken for 5 days - take a 3 day break (if you want to avoid the visual disturbances side effect) - and repeated

So my question is how many long haulers are actually trying longer term IVM use as part of their wider protocol

Instead of trying it for 5 days then writing it off

 

Summary: IVM shows single-drug response for some post-COVID19 persistent side effects like anosmia/Parosmia - which have no other comparable treatments (Stellate Ganglion Block SGB comes in a distant second - smell restraining which is the standard of care is not even partly effective) - which alone makes it an essential component to consider for protocols for long haulers - IVM hesitancy may also contribute to shorter duration use (when the drug can be easily tolerated with repeated dosing with breaks)

 

For more information on post-COVID19 anosmia, you can visit:

r/covid19anosmia

r/ivermectin

 

You would think this information would be welcomed on sub-reddits like:

r/covidlonghaulers

r/anosmia

r/Parosmia

But you would be mistaken - as these - and many of the mainstream sub-reddits - as policy - will perma-ban you if you suggest Ivermectin does anything for COVID-19

Recall that during the pandemic, YouTube actually had Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine mentioned by name in the YouTube terms of service - as unbelievable an overreach as that may seem, that was the state of affairs during the pandemic