Is boxing the only sport that picks older generations to win against newer ones? Why is that?
So in all sports I always see everyone saying athletes are bigger, faster stronger. From mma to football to basketball etc etc… it’s always a debate on who would win. Not that everyone picks the newer person or team every time but there is always a debate and it’s always brought up the advancement or tech, health and science.
Yet you ask a boxing fan this and the only time you really hear that in the mainstream is when we bring up heavyweights. Even then most people get ridiculed when you compare an usyk or a fury to someone like Ali or foreman. Going to the lower weights it’s even more skewed. You would down right get laughed at picking canelo over hagler.
My question is what is it about our sport that almost all generations say the new gens could not touch the old gens. Has boxing advanced since say the 60’s or is there only so much you can do with 2 hands so it’s all about style when it comes to a sport 1000’s of years old?