u/uniyk

https://www.geopolitechs.org/p/chinas-response-to-the-fccs-escalating

Technologies operates a supply chain data platform. It uses customs, shipping, corporate, and trade data to map supply chain networks from raw materials to final products. In 2025, U.S. Customs and Border Protection selected Altana’s “product passport” system, allowing importers to prove product origin and supply chain compliance to customs in advance. Altana’s core strength is mapping global supply chain networks, and China is one of the most important nodes in global manufacturing and trade networks. If Chinese companies cannot directly provide data to Altana, purchase its services, or participate in product passport cooperation, Altana can still rely on U.S. customs data, shipping data, and overseas customers to continue analyzing Chinese supply chains, but the completeness of its data and its verification capacity will clearly be affected. For a company whose core selling point is end-to-end supply chain visibility, this impact may be greater than the direct loss of China revenue.

The Responsible Business Alliance, or RBA, is a very important industry organization in global electronics, automotive, and consumer goods supply chains. It develops supply chain codes of conduct and provides factory audits, forced labor-specific assessments, risk questionnaires, training, and corrective action tools. Many multinational companies require suppliers to accept RBA standards or audits. Many of RBA’s activities take place at the level of Chinese factories and suppliers. Now that it has been placed on the list, organizations and individuals within China, in principle, can no longer conduct relevant transactions and cooperation with it. This may affect its membership fees, factory audits, training, data submissions, and supplier assessments. In reality, however, many RBA services are purchased centrally by multinational headquarters, which then require their Chinese subsidiaries and suppliers to implement them. How regulators will define such intra-group arrangements in the future, and whether contracts signed overseas will be treated as extending to audit activities inside China, remains to be seen.

Altana

It is worth noting that the RBA is one of the world’s most widely adopted supply chain compliance frameworks. Many multinational companies—including Apple, Dell, HP, Intel, Tesla, and Bosch—are RBA members and require their suppliers to comply with its standards. If RBA is no longer able to conduct audits in China as a result of its designation on China’s countermeasures list, many Chinese suppliers may be unable to obtain new RBA certifications or renew existing ones. Overseas customers may then require Chinese companies to adopt alternative certification schemes or conduct supplier audits themselves. This could have a meaningful impact on sectors such as electronics, automotive, new energy, semiconductors, and EMS manufacturing. Much will depend on how the countermeasures are implemented in practice. If the restrictions were to materially affect Chinese companies’ ability to meet supply chain compliance requirements, the exemption mechanism under China’s Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law could potentially be used to waive the relevant restrictions.

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/e3795a15b52f3b438b003829095c97024900af0d/comments

单纯在谷歌上搜中国，火箭和雅虎三个关键词，排名前几个文章下的评论区几乎没有反华言论，三篇文章只看到一个说中国豆腐渣工程的，和一个单纯反对中国，说中国在国际上不合群的，剩下也就说中国已经发达了，要废掉最惠国待遇云云。而主流评论当然也不会亲华就是了，很多反思日本现状的，哀叹未来的。感觉是在事实面前没法反驳，也不愿称赞，于是只有反思。

不过也有满口赞誉的，发言翻译过来我还以为是央视的通稿，这应该是极少数（尽管在这篇文章下是最高赞评论）

首创网系回收