u/yedanapuddi

I know people will say it's all on % basis which considers s different baseline for both the countries but in order to get the fastest growing tag, at least the gap with the next largest economy should reduce. But here it's increasing!

If India was still part of the empire at least the hassle of getting a visa would've been less I guess? If they did enforce an internal passport system.

Most people migrate because of better "quality of life". Would quality of life have been slightly better if india was still part of the empire?

Need help on behalf of a friend if possible

Did they ever got into any type of conflict in comics?

Or do the fans prefer him to get humiliated forever?

It looks like this is not the first time india was in economic crisis.

It hit crisis a few times before and the soviet union bailed it out.

After the 90s there was no soviet union and hence india had to turn to the IMF.

IMF was not that generous. So it makes me wonder.

Or are all three used together since there is some bifurcation depending on the task like copilot is used to work with MS OFFICE, claude with summarising documents, chatgpt for general use etc?

I am hearing chatgpt the most but want to know from people in the industry.

It looks like this thing bats & WW had for each other abruptly came to an end after the time reset.

From that episode onwards till the end there was no romance or flirting.

Even after partition and centuries of British exploitation, india was still among the top 10 economies in the world in the 1950s.

But instead of improving this ranking I believe kept tumbling and it went completely outside the top 10 by around 90s.

It should've either maintained or even climbed in the ranking.

So from whatever research I have personally done it looks like both india and China dominated global economy before the rise of European powers.

But what india & china had & even have in common today is their share of global population was also high.

We all know the way GDP is calculated, countries with high population have an advantage. This advantage was even more pronounced during the pre machine industrial era.

So was india rich because every indian was rich or was it because there were just too many people with low standard of living like it is today?

If spending was adjusted for both inflation and the % share of total global military spending that time.

People usually say that today's western countries should not be hated for their colonial past because colonialism is something every major nation states engaged in throughout history.

But from whatever history i have read it seems unlike other powers, the primary face of European colonialism were the for-profit private business entities named the east india company. It's not just the British. Even french Portugal and the Dutch had them.

Initially they all came in the name of just doing business and then the rest is history. In principle it was all free market capitalism.

After this experience almost every country in Asia & Africa adopted socialist welfare state driven and protectionist economic policy. As if they were thinking that opening up their economies would lead to a repeat of history.

The only Asian country which I think did not go this path is japan. Maybe because it did not get colonzied by a European power. Guess same applies to korea and taiwan as well.

As per history and the trials that took place it was obvious what was really going on in the minds of general dyer himself but is it ever mentioned in the history of what the soldiers were thinking?

Was it just a soldier following orders or was there anything more to it. Because I don't think any sane person would believe that opening fire on an unarmed defenceless crowd mixed with women and children is a rational thing to do.

They could've initially asked the crowd to surrender and get down on the ground.

Is this something that only happens in consulting or in other job professions as well?