
Danica changes how we should consider Teyvat's 'present'
Traveler has gone to 6 Lantern Rites. Lantern Rite is an annual festival in Liyue, meaning the Traveler should have been traveling for about 6 years. However, children such as Diona, Timmie, Yaoyao etc. have not aged a day in this time.
This led many people to view the 'present' as a floating timeline: Anything mentioned as happening 'x years ago' would be x years before the game started. Anything that happened during the events of the story is just 'Some Time Ago'.
Like how a comic or cartoon series could have 20 christmas specials without the characters aging a day or any real time passing. Like The Simpsons or Marvel Comics.
However, recent dialogues in Snezhnaya make this entire notion moot.
Danica's timeline:
- She is raised learning how to be a maid..
- She spends 8 years traveling Teyvat.
- During her Travels, she is unable to enter Inazuma due to the Sakoku Decree.
- She returns to Snezhnaya.
- She spends 3 years and 2 months in her position as a maid.
This means the Sakoku Decree was active at minimum 3 years and 2 months before the 'present' story in Snezhnaya.
--
Sakoku Decree:
- Was called into effect alongside the Vision Hunt Decree
- Had been in effect since the previous year by the time of the Osial crisis
- Was abolished after Traveler's interventions in Inazuma
The Sakoku Decree must have been in effect for somewhere between 1-2 years before its abolishment.
Side note: Paimon mentions in this conversation that she remembers Inazuma's situation 1 year ago. Is she talking about before, or after she was in the water? We presumably spent months with her before setting out for Mondstadt, so it could be about after.
--
If Danica followed floating timeline rules, her attempt to enter Inazuma could not have been thwarted by the Sakoku Decree, as it would have to have taken place 2 years before the Sakoku Decree was called into effect.
Getting a clear view on the exact year is a bit difficult
This definitely reframes how we should consider what characters say about the passage of time. If someone says 'this happens x years ago', it's not x years before the events of the game. It's x years before that exact moment.
Which does of course beg the question: What's wrong with the children?