
r/linguisticshumor

How it feels being each level of a language
A1: Just a little bit of everything, maybe one or two words per sentence. No full sentences! I suck, but I’m happy.
A2: If it’s in simple, <10 word sentences, I’m almost fluent! I don’t suck!
B1: I understand everything based on vibes, and can come up with a passable response. I might suck?
B2: I understand normal conversations, but speak incorrectly. Technically fluent, in the sense of flowing, but damn I suck.
C1: I can understand everything, speak correctly a lot of the time, but still sound unnatural. Damn, I suck.
C2: ???? (Please tell me your experiences)
Dont speak Chinese but I understand this perfectly
Is there a pseudo-linguistics theory popular in your country?
In Korea, there are fools who connect Tamil and Korean, and since Korean is an isolated language with no connection to any language in its basic vocabulary, excluding loanwords like Sino-Korean words, it seems to stem from a desire to find a sister language somehow.
It is truly ridiculous. 🤣🤣🤣
Similarly, Lahu in Thailand is another language that becomes a victim of this, but it is less mainstream compared to Tamil.
The grammar of Korean, Japanese, Mongolian, and Turkish is surprisingly similar, and it was once the mainstream theory that they belonged to the same language family, but the problem is that there is no lexical evidence whatsoever. Older generations who went to school in the past still believe this theory, but they are just slow to update their knowledge, and they are not stupid.
These kind of videos some times feel like ragebait
Etymology of "ZOO" in the major languages of Mainland Southeast Asian and East Asian countries
Writing systems featured in the image:
[Quốc Âm Tân Tự | Hangul | Kana | Zhuyin | 漢字 | Âksâr Khmêr | Akson Thai | Akson Lao | Mranma Akkhara | Devanagari | Latin script & Chữ Quốc ngữ]
New math operator just dropped!
Aren't these flipped?
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E0%A6%B0%E0%A7%81%E0%A6%9F%E0%A6%BF#Bengali
(I mean that the IPA for the first one looks like it starts with a trill, but sounds like it starts with an approximant, and the reverse is true of the other one.)
I feel like the approximant is more common in Rarhi Bengali than most sources say, anecdotally my dad uses it and he's from the Rarh region in West Bengal
A common misconception
Vowel and consonant length in Hungarian and Finnish have nothing to do with each other.
Guess the region where this language is spoken (and the language if you can)
Why are GOOSE and TUNE analysed as having the same vowel?
So goose and tune both have [uː ~ uw], but tune, as well as many (most? all?) other long-u words, originate from Norman French through Middle English /yː/ which evolved into [juː]. They merged into words that used to have [ɪw] and [ew] like new and threw. Later the [juː] was affected by yod-dropping and yod-coalescence in different dialects, so you get [nuw ~ njuː] and [tuːn ~ tjuːn ~ t͡ʃuːn] which only merges with goose/toon words under yod-dropping, since toon is also [tuːn].
My question is why is the [j] in the TUNE set (and I guess in CURE as well if you split it from a hypothetical TOUR set) is considered part of the onset consonant cluster and not a rising diphthong in the nucleus. Is the reason etymological, phonological, something else? It's odd to me that long U represents a two-phoneme sequence when other diphthongs like /o͡ʊ/ and /a͡ɪ/ are treated as a single vowel phoneme?
E: just realised I posted this to the humour sub, meh. Hopefully you guys can still help but feel free to jerk instead