u/AK_14962

I'm looking to start a small study group for students who are genuinely interested in improving at Maths, Physics, Chemistry, English, Computer Science, or other STEM-related subjects.

The idea is pretty simple:

• group study sessions
• Work through difficult problems together
• Explain concepts to each other
• Share useful resources

Any curriculum/exam board is welcome, although I'm particularly interested in IGCSE/GCSE and A-Level students.

If you're interested, comment with:
Grade/Year + subjects + exam board (if applicable) + where are you based (if you don't mind sharing)

If enough people are interested, we can set up a study group.
(Posting this in multiple places so just a heads up that this ain't the only place)

I'm looking to start a small study group for students who are genuinely interested in improving at Maths, Physics, Chemistry, English, Computer Science, or other STEM-related subjects.

The idea is pretty simple:

• group study sessions
• Work through difficult problems together
• Explain concepts to each other
• Share useful resources

Any curriculum/exam board is welcome, although I'm particularly interested in IGCSE/GCSE and A-Level students.

If you're interested, comment with:
Grade/Year + subjects + exam board (if applicable)

If enough people are interested, we can set up a study group.
(Posting this in multiple places so just a heads up that this ain't the only place)

I'm looking to start a small study group for students who are genuinely interested in improving at Maths, Physics, Chemistry, English, Computer Science, or other STEM-related subjects.

The idea is pretty simple:

• group study sessions
• Work through difficult problems together
• Explain concepts to each other
• Share useful resources

Any curriculum/exam board is welcome, although I'm particularly interested in IGCSE/GCSE and A-Level students.

If you're interested, comment with:
Grade/Year + subjects + exam board (if applicable)

If enough people are interested, we can set up a study group.
(Posting this in multiple places so just a heads up that this ain't the only place)

Hi everyone,

I'm Aniruddh, a 15 year old building Consecuencia, a deterministic engineering intelligence platform for aerospace.

The problem I'm trying to solve is one I've seen come up repeatedly in aerospace and other safety critical industries: engineering decisions are documented, but the reasoning behind them gradually gets lost. When requirements change, suppliers update parts, new test results arrive, or designs evolve, it becomes difficult to understand what is affected and whether the original decision is still valid.

Consecuencia is designed to help engineering teams:

• Retrieve the reasoning behind past engineering decisions with complete traceability to supporting evidence.

• Understand downstream impacts before implementing design, manufacturing, supplier, software, or configuration changes.

• Continuously monitor whether previous engineering decisions remain valid as new evidence, test results, design revisions, supplier updates, and quality events emerge.

Unlike probabilistic AI systems, Consecuencia does not invent evidence. Every conclusion must be backed by engineering records, and if the required evidence does not exist, it explicitly reports that.

I'm looking for honest feedback from engineers. Does this solve a problem you've experienced? If not, what am I missing? If yes, how are you handling it today?

I'd really appreciate your thoughts, criticism, and suggestions.

Over the past few months I've been building Consecuencia, a platform designed to help aerospace engineering teams answer questions like:

• Why was this design decision made?
• Has this failure happened before?
• Is this engineering decision still valid after new test results, design revisions, supplier changes, or regulatory updates?

The core idea is simple: every answer must be backed by real engineering records. If the evidence doesn't exist, the system says exactly that instead of generating a plausible answer.

More recently, I've been building a feature that continuously monitors existing engineering decisions and alerts teams when new evidence invalidates the original basis for that decision.

I'm at the stage where I need brutally honest feedback from engineers.

My questions are:

1. Does this solve a problem you've actually experienced?
2. What's the biggest reason you wouldn't adopt something like this?
3. If you were evaluating it for your team, what capability would you expect before even considering a pilot?

I'm not looking for compliments. I'd much rather hear why you think this won't work than have people tell me it's a great idea.

JS felt like mentioning these:

Entrepreneur - B2B (Aerospace) SaaS Startup
State Level Taekwondo Player, likewise for football
Lived in 6 countries (Each Country avg: 1.75 years)

Socials I use: WA, Discord, X and Reddit ofc (no insta or snap so don't even bother if you prefer that)

Js dm me if y'all wanna connect, if you're looking for a goon partner or are some fuckass pedo do not fuckin dm me

(I'm AK)