Lab report quality has dropped noticeably since we moved to fully typed submissions, curious if others are seeing this and how you're handling it
We moved to fully typed lab report submissions at the start of the year and the quality has dropped in ways I didn't expect. Pre-typed submissions had their own problems but they at least showed me what students actually understood about the content. Now I'm getting reports that are shorter, less precise, and harder to assess because the science is buried under the struggle to type it out.
The pattern I keep seeing is that students who are slow typists produce reports that read like they didn't understand the experiment, but when I talk to them verbally they clearly did. The understanding is there. The ability to get it onto a screen in a reasonable amount of time isn't.
I've tried a few workarounds but none of them feel like real solutions. Letting them handwrite and then type doesn't work because it doubles the time. Voice-to-text creates its own mess. I'm starting to think this is really a school-wide keyboarding problem that just shows up most visibly in classes where written output matters. Curious how other teachers in writing-heavy content areas are handling it.