Everyone has always hated the truth speakers, the prophets. People don't like listening to hard truths but I am hear to share facts and my arguments are always backed up by data and stats.
These clubs in my opinion have a history that is overrated.
Man utd - They have great history yes but they have 3 champions leagues only. They don't even have the most league titles anymore. Historically I can name 6 or 7 clubs that are more successful
Arsenal - Their history is what exactly? All they mention is a useless achievement which is invincibles. They have 0 ucls which is the biggest trophy.
Spurs - yes Ik they aren't rated that high but they should be rated even lower. They don't have a better history than Everton or Villa. They have only 2 league titles and 0 ucls.
Now on to underrated
Man City: first of all everyone thinks they didn't win anything before 2008 when they had as many titles as spurs but one has history apparently and the other does not. Secondly, people think recent success isn't history. Yes it is. The treble that man city won is part of their history now. The titles they have won under pep are all a part of their history. They have 10 league titles now which is a lot and they are probably gonna win a lot more in the future
PSG: same argument as city. People think recent success isn't history. The back to back ucls they have won have already been added to their history now and their success in the last 2 decades makes them a very successful club
Liverpool: Yes I know everyone knows how successful they are but I feel like they still get underrated. I personally put them as the most successful club of all time after real Madrid. They have the most league titles and the most ucls in premier league history. Man utd doesn't even come close when they have less trophies same titles and half the amount of ucls. Therefore, comparing these clubs history imo is stupid
There never was. It's big 5. Before city it was big 4. Finishing high consistently means fuck all of you're not gonna win shit. Spurs is a small club historically and presently. They are a nothing club. They have won 2 premier league. 2 Premier league titles and that's it. They won a fucking Europa league after God knows how long. They have no recent success and they have no past success. Infact I highly doubt I'd put them in the top 10 clubs in the league
Henry
Aguero
Alan shearer
Harry Kane
Haaland
Eyetest will tell you that hazard is better than salah when it's not actually true. One thing I'll say is this. The eyetest of someone who is qualified and knows football well and isn't just using eyetest to justify why a player he personally finds enjoyable to watch is better, I'll trust that opinion. However, nowadays people use eyetest in a wrong sense as in a player who is more beautiful to watch is better. That's not always the case. Ik stats can be misleading and they can be manipulated as well. However, if I need to choose from someone who I prefer to watch someone who actually produces numbers I'd say the guy producing the numbers is usually better 90 percent of the time.
Rooney was never actually that good. He showed glimpses of brilliance and potential to be the best but that's it. He had 2 great goalscoring seasons, one where he scored 26 goals the other he scored 27. That's it. Compared that to haaland, the guy scoring 27 in his off season as much as Rooneys best. Now ik Rooney could do more but then why is he considered better than Harry Kane who's goal per game ratio is far superior for a worse club and is also just as complete as Rooney. My point isn't that he isn't good, it's that he is overrated. Is he better than drogba, Jamie vardy etc? Yes I do think so. I don't think he is close to Henry. I think he is below aguero Kane and haaland. So while I agree he is a legend I still think he is overrated.
Benzema is a one season wonder. As in not that he had one good season but 1 season where he performed at a level that was able to match the best of the best strikers ie Suarez and lewandowski. No one rated him before this and his PR went through the roof after that. But one such season isn't enough to put him top 5. So here are 5 better strikers
Suarez
Lewandowski
Harry Kane
Aguero
Antoine griezmann
I would place him 6th after griezmann which is fair cuz I do rate him highly. I just think he has gotten a bit overrated
Everyone hating city for the exact thing every club has but conveniently they werent charged for it cuz there was no ffp back then. Now that the top clubs have established themselves they wanted to keep them there.
Respect man city for fighting back and not playing by these shitty rules
I never rated rodri anyway. I've always said he is overrated and he def robbed vini of his ballon dor as well.
Barcelona just wasted 65 mil and they don't even know it 😭. He is so finished. Nico gonzalez is far better anyway
Assanal know Man City are better and they just got lucky so they paid Enzo maresca to come to city to destroy what pep has built
I think I've watched alot of popular and well liked shows such as game of thrones, breaking bad, sopranos etc. however, none of them have had an impact on me like mr robot. From beginning to end it is just perfect. Even season 2 that gets a lot of hate was like a 10/10 season for me.
2022 man city concede 3 goals and lose in the community shield, then they win treble.
2026 man city concede 3 goals again and lose in community shield.
So we all know what's about to happen
It was actually only cr7. Benzema peaked after him, bale was mostly injured. MSN was 10 times better
I came here long time ago and I was told I work hard and do my studies so I will get pr but I they did not give me PR. Why? It's so unfair
You can dislike a player all you want but the facts are the facts. Look at Harry Kane for example. He also joined Bayern like Neymar did with PSG with the main goal being to win a champions league. Are you telling me that if he doesn't do that he has been a failure? Ik he likely will but still.
PSG on the other hand, was a club that had never even won a champions league. You can't just say Neymar failed at PSG because they didn't win a champions league with them. Here are the neymars stats for psg. 118 goals 77 assists 173 games. If this is a failure to you then I don't know what to say. Literally more goals contributions than number of games played. And ok let's just say that's because it ligue 1 so his stats are inflated let's look at ucl stats for PSG then. 22 goals 16 assist in 41 appearances.
But apparently the narrative around Neymar is that he just had a few good seasons at Barcelona and then "failed" at PSG. You're telling these are the stats of someone who failed?
What's even worse is people saying he failed for Brazil. The guy is literally their top scorer in a nation with a huge history of legends including Pele romario r9 Kaka Ronaldinho Ronaldo etc. in world cups he has 13 goal contributions in 15 games. If you watched the 2014 wc you will know how insane he was and the way he carried that team and they completely fell apart without him. Then in 2022 wc in qatar he literally took the ball from halfway line linked up with a teammate to score a winning goal in the final mins against Croatia and that still wasn't enough as they conceded right afterwards. Everyone forgets how Neymar has been let down time and time again by his teammates and yet they all just blame him for his country's failures.
The biggest myth against Neymar is that his peak was short and doesn't have longevity. That is completely false. If you have any ball knowledge you'd know that Neymar was at his prime from 2010 all the way until 2022. Ronaldinho doesnt even come close to that level of longevity/consistency