u/ElvisGrizzly

Does anyone have experience in switching from Rybelsus to Wegovy pill?

I'm considering it and wondering 1 - what are the dosage matches (I'm at 14mg rybelsus) and 2 - what has your experience been so far?

reddit.com
u/ElvisGrizzly — 4 days ago
▲ 7 r/luminarneo+1 crossposts

Can someone explain to me why RAW files look so much worse when opened for edit on LUMINAR as opposed to Apple Photos editing or Photomator or Pixelmator Pro?

This is the same RAW photo shot on iphone 15 pro max in DNG opened in all four programs. The luminar is opened as an extension but it's the same if you open it natively. Is there a setting I'm not seeing that's making it worse? There used to be some camera profiles you could switch RAW photos to that made them somewhat better in the Develop section but that's since gone away. Why is your starting RAW iphone photo worse in Luminar and how do you fix that?

u/ElvisGrizzly — 4 hours ago

Okay so based on that Ken Martin interview, WHAT is possibly in the report that has Kenny so determined not to release it?

Ken literally brought up - as part of his campaigning for the gig - that NOT releasing the last autopsy was a mistake. Which means whatever's in there must be pretty bad in some way that he or top donors don't want seen. My guess? One of three things

  1. More Biden age stuff we knew (but now corroborated by someone besides Jake Tapper) - As in dozens of party mid-levels going on record to say they knew Joe was not there anymore and asked people to take action months before they did. And obviously nothing was done. So that kind of clear timeline with multiple folks co-corroborating will obviously add to the "old guard is the worst" narrative while also inflaming the "WE SHOULD HAVE STOOD BY JOE" blueanon crowd on threads. =

  2. Kamala stuff we didn't know - As in some huge failing in the campaign structure (likely the 'sister/basic chief of staff' in charge of things she couldn't fire and who has been implicated in pre-campaign pieces). Or something new. And here he doesn't want to be the white guy seeming to blame the woman of color middling candidate who had only limited time to run because of the old man prez with hubris and no common sense.

  3. Israel and Gaza - That there would be some sort of complete agreement from activists on the ground, especially younger ones, who said "yeah Gaza pissed everyone off we needed to knock doors and we need to recalibrate on Israel." Which with a certain high level donor class is basically like shouting Candyman in the mirror three times.

1 is bad but it basically is all about core Biden apologists. And they are all old and at some point they lose the Old Guard anyway when the lipitor wears off. I don't think it's that one.

2 is more likely but it would have to be really bad to spike the report. Because it's not like they're worried they'll hurt the candidacy of someone who's going to run again and matter. She's going to get bounced at the first debate if she even makes it to one Iowa fair. Even if she wasn't a bad candidate with worse instincts, she's too tied to enabling a guy who got us into this mess with his befuddled old man instincts and a circus of enablers

3 is, I think the the winner winner chicken dinner. Because that's about the future of the party. The other two are backward looking. That one, if you release it, forces the party to say "yeah we need to move on from blanket backing Israel so long as a crazy party holds the reins of the government there." What's crazy is when he decided NOT to release it, the 'back Israel anyway' Dem consensus was a lot stronger and probably the conventional wisdom. Now it's flipped. So he's out of step with his party on it. Not some of the bigger donors I'm sure but definitely the vibe on the ground in general.

Or am I missing some other possible thing he might be spiking this for?

reddit.com
u/ElvisGrizzly — 13 days ago
▲ 2.7k r/tifu

TIFU by thinking all of you were taking too long in the bathroom when really I had a stomach bug for over a decade

So my dad used to spend a lot of time in the bathroom. Like he'd take TWO books in with him. And in one traumatic memory, he once made me bring him my leftover birthday party mickey mouse napkins when he ran out of TP. ("NO. Not MICKEY!")

Anyway as a child it left a mark.

So I was determined to spend as little time going #2 as possible. Go in. Do your business, get out. So that's what I did. I worked to develop what I thought to be strong control. To get it out in five minutes tops. With training and straining I thought that's what I'd done and it had continued into my latter adulthood. Especially in public bathrooms, I'd go in, drop one and leave, while shaking my head at the people taking so long to do what clearly was a MUCH shorter operation. All these time wasters, obviously playing with their phones.

Or so I thought.

As part of a promise to get myself checked out after a family member's death, I went overseas (screw you American health prices) and paid for a lot of tests including an endoscopy and a colonoscopy. Turns out I had H. Pylori. That the doctor mused I might have had for at least for a decade. Possibly longer. What's that cause? Among other things, irregular flows in the #2 department.

To treat it I got a very aggressive round of antibiotics. No big deal I thought. I don't love them as they've caused me stomach problems in the past (which I might have taken as a sign but I clearly didn't). But I saw it through to the end this time and finally beat the bacterial colony that apparently had a long term lease in my gut.

Since then I am basically making Wombat level waste bricks (minus the right angles) and it is NOT the process I am used to. Occasionally I've needed to use the handicapped stall when available just so I can have that wall handlebar for leverage.

THIS Is what you people have been doing with your intestines? This WHOLE time?

Well anyway I was wrong. And now I have the time to think about it. Because I am clearly not going anywhere for a much longer portion of my day.

TL,DR: Thought I was great at going to the bathroom. Turned out the bacteria was great at going, not me.

Edit: to be clear, not EVERY one is that bad but more than a few are. Which, again, is proof that the bacteria have been covering for my less than ideal eating habits for a hunk of my adult life. Which is to say yes, now, I'm also working on changing my diet. And I have time to think about that now as well.

reddit.com
u/ElvisGrizzly — 18 days ago

Ken literally brought up - as part of his campaigning for the gig - that NOT releasing the last autopsy was a mistake. Which means whatever's in there must be pretty bad in some way that he or top donors don't want seen. My guess? One of three things

  1. More Biden age stuff we knew (but now corroborated by someone besides Jake Tapper) - As in dozens of party mid-levels going on record to say they knew Joe was not there anymore and asked people to take action months before they did. And obviously nothing was done. So that kind of clear timeline with multiple folks co-corroborating will obviously add to the "old guard is the worst" narrative while also inflaming the "WE SHOULD HAVE STOOD BY JOE" blueanon crowd on threads. =

  2. Kamala stuff we didn't know - As in some huge failing in the campaign structure (likely the 'sister/basic chief of staff' in charge of things she couldn't fire and who has been implicated in pre-campaign pieces). Or something new. And here he doesn't want to be the white guy seeming to blame the woman of color middling candidate who had only limited time to run because of the old man prez with hubris and no common sense.

  3. Israel and Gaza - That there would be some sort of complete agreement from activists on the ground, especially younger ones, who said "yeah Gaza pissed everyone off we needed to knock doors and we need to recalibrate on Israel." Which with a certain high level donor class is basically like shouting Candyman in the mirror three times.

1 is bad but it basically is all about core Biden apologists. And they are all old and at some point they lose the Old Guard anyway when the lipitor wears off. I don't think it's that one.

2 is more likely but it would have to be really bad to spike the report. Because it's not like they're worried they'll hurt the candidacy of someone who's going to run again and matter. She's going to get bounced at the first debate if she even makes it to one Iowa fair. Even if she wasn't a bad candidate with worse instincts, she's too tied to enabling a guy who got us into this mess with his befuddled old man instincts and a circus of enablers

3 is, I think the the winner winner chicken dinner. Because that's about the future of the party. The other two are backward looking. That one, if you release it, forces the party to say "yeah we need to move on from blanket backing Israel so long as a crazy party holds the reins of the government there." What's crazy is when he decided NOT to release it, the 'back Israel anyway' Dem consensus was a lot stronger and probably the conventional wisdom. Now it's flipped. So he's out of step with his party on it. Not some of the bigger donors I'm sure but definitely the vibe on the ground in general.

Or am I missing some other possible thing he might be spiking this for?

reddit.com
u/ElvisGrizzly — 22 days ago