What's the difference between a cult and a strict, fundie, christian church?
Is there a difference?
I was raised in a small, family-led independent fundamentalist Christian church that sat somewhere between Pentecostalism and Brethren traditions. There were about 50 of us, made up of around nine families plus a few single people.
The founder was a huge man with a very black-and-white way of thinking and extremely strict about arbitrary things. Half the church were his children and their families. His sons-in-law became the church elders.
He shouted when he preached. Everyone was afraid of him. I remember my parents being “disciplined” several times, not physically, but sternly spoken to in private over various bits of nonsense.
I left in my early 20s after being kicked off the worship team for dating a non-Christian.
The main thing I remember feeling there was fear. So I guess with that level of fear and control, it was a cult?
After that, I attended a more “progressive” church. People were kind, I never felt afraid, and I could disagree with leadership or other members without repercussions. I eventually left because my faith disappeared, but I never considered that church a cult because the atmosphere felt completely different.
I’m now studying psychotherapy, and in class I mentioned being raised in a cult. A woman in my class asked which church it was, and we realised we had some mutual connections through another church. She was curious about why I called my church a cult when she believes the connected church was not one.
What do we think makes one church a cult and another not a cult?