Looking for moderators
Hi,
I'm leaving. I'd like to get a couple of mods here before I go!
Leave a comment and we can chat afterwards.
Hi,
I'm leaving. I'd like to get a couple of mods here before I go!
Leave a comment and we can chat afterwards.
Hi,
As I will be leaving the team I'd like to first add a moderator or two so that the subreddit does not fall completely unmoderated!
Drop a comment here if you're interested!
Hi,
I've been around for 2 years as the top mod. The sub grew from 40k members to 600k users in that timespan - that's an order of magnitude. I've been here trying to make your lives easier and I like to think I've done a decent job. At least you've been telling me nice things about my style and I appreciate that.
Reddit recently rolled out an age check for EU-based members. Non-age verified redditors cannot view mature content. Any post made under the "NSFW" tag, any NSFW subreddit and any profile with even a single NSFW contribution is off-limits to me. I get the pictured pop-up and it's making my ability to tell bad actors from good contributors just that much harder when I'm unable to view a user's profile (at all). It's not like they hide the mature content, I just can't access the profile. Normally I'd be able to see +-30 days of the user's all contributions (even if their profile is curated) which Reddit thinks is a good idea "for moderation [purposes]". Apparently if they've ever posted a picture of a rotten tomato on a food sub with the NSFW tag enabled I need to be procted from that. Then it's not longer a good idea to show any of the other contributions.
On top of this Reddit is hiding my own content tagged as "NSFW" from ... me. If I post on r/bugs (the subreddit where you're supposed to report bugs with the platform) saying "Hey, I cannot view my own NSFW posts" I will be unable to see it. Ask me how I know.
I hope you see why this could be a problem.
I chose the third option. I love you all but killing the 3rd party API access, introducing pointless AI tools & mandatory filters, then killing the API self-serve tool and now hiding some essentials is taking a toll on me. There's no drama in the mod team and nothing wrong with you - purely a Reddit issue. I will be around for a few days to address some loose ends but then it'll be time to log out, uninstall the app and turn the lights off.
Wish the remaining team good luck and be supportive of them!
Feel free to chat with me while I'm still around. Just leave a comment! :)
Inspired by: https://www.reddit.com/r/mtg/s/vum8CDaty4
This isn't pertaining to any particular era or meta but the card showcases that colour's most iconic effect and does it so in a recognisable way.
"Best, barely unplayable" means that the card always has a slightly better alternative that costs a little less for this effect or it has a similarly costed alternative with upsides.
For white I picked [[Glorious Anthem]]. White is known for tokens, Auras, small creatures, protective spells, Vigilance, Angels and - my pick - static effects granting upsides to creatures. Sure, [[Healing Salve]] is probably the most useless and widely recognised protection spell but I wanted to include a card that actually does something. The overarching theme seems to be "be smol, get stronk" and I felt like Glorious Anthem fit that bill best.
For blue I picked [[Divination]]. Blue is hands down best known for drawing cards so the choice is obvious. Divination is barely unplayable and very iconic so I think it represents blue's domain best. The other very strong contender is [[Cancel]] as the best unplayable counterspell but between the two cards that reference drawing outnumber cards that counter spells.
For black I picked [[Murder]]. Black is known for its generic ability to "kill" as in get rid of a creature. The choice is between self-sacrifice, recursion/reanimation, target creature removal, Demons, and life loss as a resource. [[Painful Lesson]] is a card that's outside of getting rid of a creature but it's not very iconic. All its siblings that are iconic are very efficient and as such they don't qualify. [[Reassembling Skeleton]] is iconic and embodies the reanimation side of black but ultimately I felt like Murder has to happen before reanimation.
For red I picked [[Lightning Strike]]. While not the most iconic card it does what red is best known for: direct damage. A more iconic contender would have been [[Lava Axe]] but Lightning Strike is mechanically very close to [[Lightning Bolt]], the pinnacle of red power.
For green I picked [[Colossal Dreadmaw]]. Meme. Hehe. But it's also a (slightly overcosted) Trample creature, which is what green does best. Having a chonker of an attacker is how green applies pressure. Pump spells such as [[Giant Growth]], or recursion such as [[Regrowth]] could have worked, too. (Obviously those two are "good" cards so they wouldn't qualify.) I just felt like it should be a creature.
What would you pick? Criteria: you wouldn't play it competitively because it has a better alternative but it embodies that colour's philosophy.
I know [[Teshar Apostle]] and [[Oswald Fiddle]] are valid. I was curious about combining the two and adding black tutors.
Teshar has a nice straight line with Lurrus and a sac outlet for infinite mana. Other than that [[Krark-Clan Ironworks]] and [[Ashnod's Altar]] go infinite with pretty much everything so the potential combos are way layered and having access to mediocre draw only (no Rhystic lol) doesn't massively hurt.
I fear I may end up with a B4 fringe deck as opposed to a recurring stax-y value train. How badly upsetting is playing an off-meta deck that may or may not be quite there? Mainly asking for "casual cEDH" for pickup games online. Tournaments are probably a futile attempt.
Hi,
Starting as of ~yesterday many Magic: The Gathering Discord servers were hit by bots that DM innocuous looking links on Discord. In reality those links don't lead to the place they're supposed to - this is called domain masking. More info: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_masking The scammer's link hijacks your accounts and they lock you out of them.
[put the link text here](https://url-goes-here.lol) and the end result is just an ordinary looking link. The confusion arises from "put the link text here" looking like another website.Please, please be really careful on the Internet.
A more technical and comprehensive explanation of session hijacking: https://www.pingidentity.com/en/resources/blog/post/session-hijacking.html
My profile via Android while logged in. Settings say my profile is "curated" to show 21 communities.
My profile via Desktop Web and Mobile Web while in incognito mode (not logged in). Blocked by "network security".
My profile via Desktop Web while logged in. Everything is hidden.
Logged into my other account via another Chrome browser profile. Everything is visible, including communities I've "curated" / hidden.
I am not suspended or restricted.
------------------------
What on Earth is going on?
I pre-emptively took a screenshot of my post before submitting it. I cannot see the post in the picture. It's not visible on the feed or in my profile while I'm logged in.
I'm not age verified and in EU. Imade a post to r/redditdev about the NSFW status of accounts being discoverable via PRAW but I cannot access my own post because it's mature content. I can only see notifications of people replying to it.
I did not make the post NSFW on purpose.
Do user accounts have a NSFW tag and if they do what's the property called?
I was unable to find it on:
https://praw.readthedocs.io/en/stable/code_overview/models/redditor.html#praw.models.Redditor
Do user accounts have a NSFW tag and if they do what's the property called?
I was unable to find it on:
https://praw.readthedocs.io/en/stable/code_overview/models/redditor.html#praw.models.Redditor
Do user accounts have a NSFW tag and if they do what's the property called?
I was unable to find it on:
https://praw.readthedocs.io/en/stable/code_overview/models/redditor.html#praw.models.Redditor
I was trying to investigate a hostile profile and got met with "Let's confirm your age" options being to send a picture of my ID or to send a selfie. I live in Finland - is this supposed to happen or is there a glitch? I haven't received any notification of this being instated in my country.
EDIT: Sorry, I got upset. Anyway, is there a way to perma ban all posters and commenters with NSFW profiles that I can't investigate?
EDIT 2: To be entirely clear about my intents; the pop-up is 100% getting in the way of me doing my work as a moderator, which is why I'm asking.
EDIT 3: I've now handed out my first NSFW-related ban. I was unable to access their profile so I banned them as a precaution. I explained the situation and why they're permanently banned due to us being unable to investigate. I gave them the option to remove all mature content from their profile and appeal to Reddit to change the classification.
There's a sqlite database operation where we don't care whether False is passed in lieu of 0 or conversely True is passed in lieu of 1, because sqlite natively supports booleans (and subsequently converts them to a 0 or a 1.)
I don't care whether someone passes a strict boolean, or an int with value 0 or 1 to this function. What's the cleanest and "most Pythonic" way of addressing this?
My current solution:
if is_active not in (0, 1):
raise ValueError("Must be a boolean, 0, or 1.")
else:
do_operation(is_active)
This seems to evaluate all four possible values correctly. However I'm wondering if this is the most readable solution. Any better suggestions?
Just asking for a friend. Haven't seen them lately.
Hi everyone,
As you can see in the title I wrote the word "reback" and the AutoModerator bot will trigger an automatic response. This happens on both posts and comments.
Thank you for your attention!
See for yourself: https://www.reddit.com/r/RealOrNotTCG/comments/1u3ojfh/comment/or6qpj7/
EDIT: Triggers on posts only.
Automatic emojis look really unprofessional and it's kinda getting in the way of mod work. How do I turn this off on desktop?
Context: "pre-errata" means the original rule for the way Companions worked before they received functional errata. Originally you were able to cast your Companion once per game for its mana cost, straight from outside of the game / your Sideboard (see rule: 702.139a). Lurrus is currently banned in Pioneer, Legacy and Modern. It's not restricted in Vintage, because it received functional errata where you now need to pay {3} to put the Companion from your Sideboard into your hand before casting it. Lurrus costs nowadays twice as much as it did in the beginning.
For Vintage this was a problem. It was essentially the 8th card in your hand and you had access to it every game. This also meant that you were able to cast Black Lotus twice on turn 1 and having access to it for as long as Lurrus remained on the field. Since in Vintage they only restrict cards to one copy (they don't ban) it meant that you still had access to the only Lurrus in your Sideboard. This is why the Companions received functional errata meaning they changed how it works after release.
Essentially what Lurrus does is it makes each mana value 2 or less permanent count as multiple copies of itself (once per turn). You were able to cast a Black Lotus off of it every turn, giving you access to three free mana every turn. Lurrus also gives access to your graveyard letting you self-mill whatever small thing you want and be able to use it immediately. Lurrus is still seeing occasional play, because it is just so much value.
What do you think? Is Lurrus one of the most powerful cards out there in whole of Magic - if not the most powerful?
Hi,
Just a small change. In order to combat low effort content we introduced a minimum character length for post titles. It's thirteen characters, which by my count should result in two words minimum. This encourages the idea that posts should have meaningful titles and not just random spam.
In general we've been removing low effort content with a heavier hand than before because there's been an uptick of two types of posts:
We're seriously considering adding a rule against apps and websites because there are just so damn many of them. Some are useful (and we let some through) but the vast majority of them are just repeats of existing and established services with a small gimmick. The tools, websites and apps are primarily coded with AI-assistance (which, by the way, is also against our rules) and result in low-quality content that doesn't pertain to MTG. Advertising your website is to conduct business, which is not the same as contributing towards discussion and sharing MTG-related content.
Instead, we've been telling those people that they're allowed to post about the problems, obstacles, journey and stories they've made along the way without advertising the product itself. We've then allowed the tools, apps and websites to be linked if and only if it's been requested by someone. It sounds a bit backwards (encouraging astroturfing) but the end result is something we've been rather happy with: high-effort content about Magic. We can't tell who is the author of a website and who is not so distinguishing "Where can I find this?" from "Where can I find this?" is impossible and enforcing a rule forbidding astroturfing would be guesswork.
You're awesome and feel free to leave feedback! Much love! <3