u/Opposite-Mountain255

Wasn't sure where to go to ask history minded folks for their opinion...

What do you all think?

Verfassungsblog is a peer forum for public law scholarship, open access and widely cited, and a standard venue for constitutional scholars in Europe and the United States.

Submission statement: this relates to law because it argues that Article III's good behavior standard reaches a federal judge's membership in the Federalist Society, and that the Senate defines that standard for itself.

Discusses Article II's take care clause, Article III good behavior, Article V, Article VI's oath requirement, Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, Trump v. Slaughter, Humphrey's Executor v. United States, Morrison v. Olson, Trump v. Anderson, Trump v. United States, Biden v. Nebraska, Loper Bright, Cooper v. Aaron, Nixon v. United States, Keyishian v. Board of Regents, and the 1805 Chase impeachment acquittal.

"So myself and the Existentialist Republic team drafted three citizen referral letters, the kind of letter any member of the public can send to a prosecutor asking the office to request they open an investigation. Each letter states the law the conduct violates, the publicly available facts that connect the conduct to that office, the office’s own record in similar cases, and the first documents to demand.

The District of Columbia letter is first because the entity is registered there. Most crimes in the District are prosecuted by a federal appointee the President selects, but charity fraud is an exception: the elected DC Attorney General prosecutes charitable solicitation violations himself. His office already recovered $750,000 from the Trump inaugural committee.

The New York letter goes with it, because Freedom 250’s fundraising reached New York and the office that obtained the Trump Foundation’s dissolution runs the state’s Charities Bureau. New York adds a reason to act first. The state has its own double jeopardy law: once a federal prosecution for the same acts finishes, New York loses the power to bring its own case, with narrow exceptions. The courts dismissed the Manafort prosecution under that law in 2019 because the Manhattan District Attorney waited for the federal case to finish, and a protective federal plea, a narrow case the Department of Justice could file and settle fast, would end a Freedom 250 case the same way.

Delaware chartered the LLC, and Delaware law lets its Attorney General ask the Court of Chancery, Delaware’s business court, to cancel the charter, the document that gives the company its legal existence, and to appoint a receiver, a neutral officer the court places in control of the company and its records. A receiver in control of the records can produce the donor lists that every other office needs and that Freedom 250 keeps secret."