Hello.
I have automated several parameters in Retrologue 2. Now, every time I select and move another parameter, Cubase writes another automation rail for the new selected parameter, but I want it to read and write an automation rail for the previous ones, only.
How can I disable this?
Thank you.
Hello!
I'm mixing a piece of classical music, and after mixing and mastering, I've achieved an average of -16.1 integrated LUFS across the entire piece (it only reaches -14.9 integrated LUFS for a brief moment during the loudest section).
I checked the potential penalty for this LUFS level on a well-known website, and all the levels showed 0.0 (only one platform added approximately +0.7).
I know it’s hard to answer without hearing it, but: Do you think this is a good level to achieve a decent volume without sacrificing the performers’ dynamics, or would it sound too quiet? From what I understand, this level is reasonable for this genre, but I’d like to hear your opinion. I listened to the piece, and it sounds good to me.
Thank you very much!
Hi!
I'm mixing a piece of classical music, and after mixing and mastering, I've achieved an average of -16.1 integrated LUFS across the entire piece (it only reaches -14.9 integrated LUFS for a brief moment during the loudest section).
I checked the potential penalty for this LUFS level on a well-known website, and all the levels showed 0.0 (only one platform added approximately +0.7).
I know it’s hard to answer without hearing it, but: Do you think this is a good level to achieve a decent volume without sacrificing the performers’ dynamics, or would it sound too quiet? From what I understand, this level is reasonable for this genre, but I’d like to hear your opinion. I listened to the piece, and it sounds good to me.
Thank you very much!
Hello!
I'm mixing a piece of classical music, and after mixing and mastering, I've achieved an average of -16.1 integrated LUFS across the entire piece (it only reaches -14.9 integrated LUFS for a brief moment during the loudest section).
I checked the potential penalty for this LUFS level on a well-known website, and all the levels showed 0.0 (only one platform added approximately +0.7).
I know it’s hard to answer without hearing it, but: Do you think this is a good level to achieve a decent volume without sacrificing the performers’ dynamics, or would it sound too quiet? From what I understand, this level is reasonable for this genre, but I’d like to hear your opinion. I listened to the piece, and it sounds good to me.
Thank you very much!
Hello!
I'm mixing a piece of classical music, and after mixing and mastering, I've achieved an average of -16.1 integrated LUFS across the entire piece (it only reaches -14.9 integrated LUFS for a brief moment during the loudest section).
I checked the potential penalty for this LUFS level on a well-known website, and all the levels showed 0.0 (only one platform added approximately +0.7).
I know it’s hard to answer without hearing it, but: Do you think this is a good level to achieve a decent volume without sacrificing the performers’ dynamics, or would it sound too quiet? From what I understand, this level is reasonable for this genre, but I’d like to hear your opinion. I listened to the piece, and it sounds good to me.
Thank you very much!
Hello!
I'm mixing a piece of classical music, and after mixing and mastering, I've achieved an average of -16.1 integrated LUFS across the entire piece (it only reaches -14.9 integrated LUFS for a brief moment during the loudest section).
I checked the potential penalty for this LUFS level on a well-known website, and all the levels showed 0.0 (only one platform added approximately +0.7).
I know it’s hard to answer without hearing it, but: Do you think this is a good level to achieve a decent volume without sacrificing the performers’ dynamics, or would it sound too quiet? From what I understand, this level is reasonable for this genre, but I’d like to hear your opinion. I listened to the piece, and it sounds good to me.
Thank you very much!
Hello!
I'm mixing a classical music piece, and after mixing and mastering, I've ended up with an average of -16.1 integrated LUFS across the entire piece (it is around -14.9 integrated LUFS only for a moment in the loudest excerpt).
I checked the potential penalty for this LUFS level on a well-known website, and all the levels showed 0.0 (only one platform would add about +0.7).
I know it's hard to answer if you don't listen to it, but: do you think this is a good level to aim for to achieve a good volume without sacrificing the performers’ dynamics, or would it end up sounding too quiet? As far as I understand, this level is reasonable for this genre, but I’d like to hear your opinion. I listened to the piece and it sounds good to me.
Thank you very much!
Hello!
How can I select the notes painted in black with the Logical Editor? I only want to select the second one of every two notes.
Thank you!
¡Hola!
Me preguntaba si hay alguna manera de mover mis instrumentos KORG del software KORG Software Pass a un disco duro externo. El software no da pistas sobre cómo hacerlo.
¡Gracias!
¡Hola!
​
Estoy mezclando en un proyecto que sólo tiene clips de audio ya renderizados y he observado lo siguiente:
​
Cuando hay una determinada cantidad de instancias de Frequency2 usadas como inserciones en varios canales con LIN activado en el Low cut y en el High cut el clic del metrónomo se adelanta un poco respecto de la acentuación correcta de la música. Sin embargo, cuando elimino esas instancias de Frequency (eliminar, no sólo bypass), el clic vuelve a estar perfectamente en su sitio.
​
Utilizo LIN porque según leí el no hacerlo puede provocar picos descontrolados en el Master Bus que reducen nuestro headroom, de cara al proceso de Mastering.
​
Supongo que esto ocurre por temas de rendimiento, o algo así, pero mi pregunta es: ¿esto afectará al tempo de la exportación final? ¿O todo sonará correctamente al exportarlo todo? Lo pregunto porque es difícil apreciarlo a simple vista, porque es muy sutil.
​
¡Gracias!
Mi último portátil fue un Lenovo Ideapad 700-15ISK - Laptop i5-6300HQ 12GB 1TB GTX950M 15". Busco un portátil con componentes más potentes pero con características muy similares: pantalla grande, altavoces potentes... Lo uso para producción musical y edición básica de vídeo.
Note: My last laptop was a Lenovo Ideapad 700-15ISK - Laptop i5-6300HQ 12GB 1TB GTX950M 15". I am looking for a laptop very close to it: big screen, powerful speakers... I use it for music production and basic video editing.
The Form
LAPTOP QUESTIONNAIRE
Country
Spain.
Budget
I'm just watching.
Are you open to refurbs/used options?
Maybe.
Screen size
15" or maybe even more.
Weight limit
Any.
Purpose
As I said before, I want to use it for music production and basic video editing.
Form factor
Standard/Clamshell (a regular laptop).
Intended usage
DAWs, video editing software and music notation software.
Desired battery life
As long as possible.
Please list, in order of most important to least important, the priority between Size, Weight, Performance, Battery life
Performance, size, battery life, weight.
Info/Requirements
Battery cable plugged on the left side. Powerful speakers.
Optional: Laptop mouse with keys, instead of being completely plain.
Hello!
I was working in a mix and every audio clip was selected. It seems like I accidentally pressed the "Q" key and now everything was quantized (and out of tempo).
How can I undo this? Pressing "undo" will not work, because the project was saved and was closed after having pressed that key.
Thank you!
¡Hola!
Estoy editando una voz con melodyne y ocurre lo siguiente: ya he afinado la totalidad del fragmento, pero he visto que una parte estaba fuera de tempo y he tenido que arreglarla con AudioWarp (Cubase).
Mi pregunta es: ¿hay alguna forma de conservar los fragmentos ya afinados o sólo es posible renderizarlo todo de nuevo, perdiendo los avances ya hechos?
Muchas gracias. ¡Os leo!
Hello!
I can't record some vocals that I have to sing because I can't make any loud noises right now, so I thought that maybe I could record my voice in a car.
Is this a good idea? Or is there any other better alternative?
(If it is a good idea, is there any way I can charge my laptop in the car?)
Thank you! I read you all!
Hello!
I'm mixing a song, and I used sidechain in the bass channel like this: Insert 1 - Frequency2 (Sidechain from the kick to duck lower frequencies in the bass), Insert 2 - Multiband Compressor (Sidechain from the kick to duck lower frequencies in the bass).
I want to do the same with a group channel from the synths to duck when the kick sounds. I used the first insert 1 correctly, but when I want to select my kick channel to sidechain Insert 2 - Multiband Compressor in this group channel, it just doesn't show up.
Why is this happening? Thank you.
Hello!
I am currently working in a project where I have an instrument called "Bass synth" ("Sintetizador bajo", in spanish). It sounded one way before updating to MuseScore Studio 4.7, but after updating, the sound bank has changed.
How can I preserve the older sound bank with the newer MuseScore Studio version? This sound is important, because changing it can result in having a sound that doesn't fit the composition correctly.
Thank you all!
Hello!
I am mixing an electronic music song and I was wondering how can I sidechain Kick and Snare to sound over the other instruments in the mix.
I thought that I could create a Channel bus for all the instruments of the mix (leaving Kick and Snare out of it) sidechain two Frequency (EQ) inserts (1: Kick, 2: Snare) with dynamic EQ, so always that Kick and Snare make a hit the desired frequency range comes down only when they sound.
Is this the correct way to do this or there is some better ways to achieve it?
I read you all!
