
Why were the Chinese able to destroy the rule of conquerors and then rule over them, while many European peoples were assimilated by the conquerors?
I've been studying Chinese history recently and have discovered a very interesting phenomenon.
Historically, China was conquered twice, with the entire country occupied. The Mongols and Manchus established the Yuan and Qing dynasties.
In the mid-19th century, the Chinese carried out ethnic cleansing against the Manchus.
However, the Chinese were able to destroy the conquerors' rule each time. The Ming dynasty destroyed the Yuan dynasty, and the ROC destroyed the Qing dynasty.
Furthermore, the Chinese were never assimilated by the Manchus and Mongols; in fact, they even carried out ethnic cleansing as retaliation after destroying their rule.
To this day, the Chinese still rule Inner Mongolia and Manchuria.
But many European ethnic groups seem to have been completely assimilated by their conquerors.
The most classic examples are the French and British.
Many French and British are descendants of Celts, but they were conquered by Germanic and Latin peoples long ago, yet they never destroyed the rule of these invaders.
They were even assimilated by the conquerors.
Including the Romans, and even many Germans today claiming to be Roman, I find it as ridiculous as a Chinese person claiming to be Mongolian.
To be conquered, and then worship the conqueror?
The same is true for the Anatolians. While most are descendants of the original inhabitants, with very few true Turkic descendants, they now proudly identify as Turkic.
This situation is common in Europe: assimilation by conquerors, inability to destroy their rule.